* [patch v6 01/20] posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistent
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 12:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 02/20] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible Thomas Gleixner
` (18 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signals of timers which are reprogammed, disarmed or deleted can deliver
signals related to the past. The POSIX spec is blury about this:
- "The effect of disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration
notifications is unspecified."
- "The disposition of pending signals for the deleted timer is
unspecified."
In both cases it is reasonable to expect that pending signals are
discarded. Especially in the reprogramming case it does not make sense to
account for previous overruns or to deliver a signal for a timer which has
been disarmed. This makes the behaviour consistent and understandable.
Remove the si_sys_private check from the signal delivery code and invoke
posix_timer_deliver_signal() unconditionally for posix timer related
signals.
Change posix_timer_deliver_signal() so it controls the actual signal
delivery via the return value. It now instructs the signal code to drop the
signal when:
1) The timer does not longer exist in the hash table
2) The timer signal_seq value is not the same as the si_sys_private value
which was set when the signal was queued.
This is also a preparatory change to embed the sigqueue into the k_itimer
structure, which in turn allows to remove the si_sys_private magic.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
V6: Remove the sequence increment from delivery and turn the requeue
pending check into a WARN_ON_ONCE() (Frederic)
Move the sequence increment into the delete hook so that the exit
cleanup path is covered too
---
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 2 --
kernel/signal.c | 6 ++----
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 2 +-
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
---
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -137,8 +137,6 @@ static inline void clear_posix_cputimers
static inline void posix_cputimers_init_work(void) { }
#endif
-#define REQUEUE_PENDING 1
-
/**
* struct k_itimer - POSIX.1b interval timer structure.
* @list: List head for binding the timer to signals->posix_timers
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -550,10 +550,8 @@ static void collect_signal(int sig, stru
list_del_init(&first->list);
copy_siginfo(info, &first->info);
- *resched_timer =
- (first->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) &&
- (info->si_code == SI_TIMER) &&
- (info->si_sys_private);
+ *resched_timer = (first->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) &&
+ (info->si_code == SI_TIMER);
__sigqueue_free(first);
} else {
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static void __posix_cpu_timer_get(struct
* - Timers which expired, but the signal has not yet been
* delivered
*/
- if (iv && ((timer->it_signal_seq & REQUEUE_PENDING) || sigev_none))
+ if (iv && timer->it_status != POSIX_TIMER_ARMED)
expires = bump_cpu_timer(timer, now);
else
expires = cpu_timer_getexpires(&timer->it.cpu);
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -269,7 +269,10 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct ke
if (!timr)
goto out;
- if (timr->it_interval && timr->it_signal_seq == info->si_sys_private) {
+ if (timr->it_signal_seq != info->si_sys_private)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ if (timr->it_interval && !WARN_ON_ONCE(timr->it_status != POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING)) {
timr->kclock->timer_rearm(timr);
timr->it_status = POSIX_TIMER_ARMED;
@@ -281,6 +284,7 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct ke
}
ret = true;
+out_unlock:
unlock_timer(timr, flags);
out:
spin_lock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
@@ -293,19 +297,18 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct ke
int posix_timer_queue_signal(struct k_itimer *timr)
{
enum posix_timer_state state = POSIX_TIMER_DISARMED;
- int ret, si_private = 0;
enum pid_type type;
+ int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&timr->it_lock);
- if (timr->it_interval) {
+ if (timr->it_interval)
state = POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING;
- si_private = ++timr->it_signal_seq;
- }
+
timr->it_status = state;
type = !(timr->it_sigev_notify & SIGEV_THREAD_ID) ? PIDTYPE_TGID : PIDTYPE_PID;
- ret = send_sigqueue(timr->sigq, timr->it_pid, type, si_private);
+ ret = send_sigqueue(timr->sigq, timr->it_pid, type, timr->it_signal_seq);
/* If we failed to send the signal the timer stops. */
return ret > 0;
}
@@ -663,7 +666,7 @@ void common_timer_get(struct k_itimer *t
* is a SIGEV_NONE timer move the expiry time forward by intervals,
* so expiry is > now.
*/
- if (iv && (timr->it_signal_seq & REQUEUE_PENDING || sig_none))
+ if (iv && timr->it_status != POSIX_TIMER_ARMED)
timr->it_overrun += kc->timer_forward(timr, now);
remaining = kc->timer_remaining(timr, now);
@@ -863,8 +866,6 @@ void posix_timer_set_common(struct k_iti
else
timer->it_interval = 0;
- /* Prevent reloading in case there is a signal pending */
- timer->it_signal_seq = (timer->it_signal_seq + 2) & ~REQUEUE_PENDING;
/* Reset overrun accounting */
timer->it_overrun_last = 0;
timer->it_overrun = -1LL;
@@ -882,8 +883,6 @@ int common_timer_set(struct k_itimer *ti
if (old_setting)
common_timer_get(timr, old_setting);
- /* Prevent rearming by clearing the interval */
- timr->it_interval = 0;
/*
* Careful here. On SMP systems the timer expiry function could be
* active and spinning on timr->it_lock.
@@ -933,6 +932,9 @@ static int do_timer_settime(timer_t time
if (old_spec64)
old_spec64->it_interval = ktime_to_timespec64(timr->it_interval);
+ /* Prevent signal delivery and rearming. */
+ timr->it_signal_seq++;
+
kc = timr->kclock;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kc || !kc->timer_set))
error = -EINVAL;
@@ -1001,7 +1003,6 @@ int common_timer_del(struct k_itimer *ti
{
const struct k_clock *kc = timer->kclock;
- timer->it_interval = 0;
if (kc->timer_try_to_cancel(timer) < 0)
return TIMER_RETRY;
timer->it_status = POSIX_TIMER_DISARMED;
@@ -1012,6 +1013,9 @@ static inline int timer_delete_hook(stru
{
const struct k_clock *kc = timer->kclock;
+ /* Prevent signal delivery and rearming. */
+ timer->it_signal_seq++;
+
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kc || !kc->timer_del))
return -EINVAL;
return kc->timer_del(timer);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 01/20] posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistent
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 01/20] posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistent Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-01 12:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2024-11-01 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:24PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> Signals of timers which are reprogammed, disarmed or deleted can deliver
> signals related to the past. The POSIX spec is blury about this:
>
> - "The effect of disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration
> notifications is unspecified."
>
> - "The disposition of pending signals for the deleted timer is
> unspecified."
>
> In both cases it is reasonable to expect that pending signals are
> discarded. Especially in the reprogramming case it does not make sense to
> account for previous overruns or to deliver a signal for a timer which has
> been disarmed. This makes the behaviour consistent and understandable.
>
> Remove the si_sys_private check from the signal delivery code and invoke
> posix_timer_deliver_signal() unconditionally for posix timer related
> signals.
>
> Change posix_timer_deliver_signal() so it controls the actual signal
> delivery via the return value. It now instructs the signal code to drop the
> signal when:
>
> 1) The timer does not longer exist in the hash table
>
> 2) The timer signal_seq value is not the same as the si_sys_private value
> which was set when the signal was queued.
>
> This is also a preparatory change to embed the sigqueue into the k_itimer
> structure, which in turn allows to remove the si_sys_private magic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* [patch v6 02/20] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 01/20] posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistent Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 12:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 03/20] posix-cpu-timers: Cleanup the firing logic Thomas Gleixner
` (17 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
The handling of the timer overrun in the signal code is inconsistent as it
takes previous overruns into account. This is just wrong as after the
reprogramming of a timer the overrun count starts over from a clean state,
i.e. 0.
Don't touch info::si_overrun in send_sigqueue() and only store the overrun
value at signal delivery time, which is computed from the timer itself
relative to the expiry time.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
V6: Fold the timer_overrun_to_int() cleanup from Frederic and remove all
overrun fiddling from the signal path.
---
kernel/signal.c | 6 ------
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 11 ++++++-----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
---
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1968,15 +1968,9 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, st
ret = 0;
if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
- /*
- * If an SI_TIMER entry is already queue just increment
- * the overrun count.
- */
- q->info.si_overrun++;
result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
goto out;
}
- q->info.si_overrun = 0;
signalfd_notify(t, sig);
pending = (type != PIDTYPE_PID) ? &t->signal->shared_pending : &t->pending;
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -233,11 +233,12 @@ static __init int init_posix_timers(void
* The siginfo si_overrun field and the return value of timer_getoverrun(2)
* are of type int. Clamp the overrun value to INT_MAX
*/
-static inline int timer_overrun_to_int(struct k_itimer *timr, int baseval)
+static inline int timer_overrun_to_int(struct k_itimer *timr)
{
- s64 sum = timr->it_overrun_last + (s64)baseval;
+ if (timr->it_overrun_last > (s64)INT_MAX)
+ return INT_MAX;
- return sum > (s64)INT_MAX ? INT_MAX : (int)sum;
+ return (int)timr->it_overrun_last;
}
static void common_hrtimer_rearm(struct k_itimer *timr)
@@ -280,7 +281,7 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct ke
timr->it_overrun = -1LL;
++timr->it_signal_seq;
- info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr, info->si_overrun);
+ info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr);
}
ret = true;
@@ -774,7 +775,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(timer_getoverrun, timer_
if (!timr)
return -EINVAL;
- overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr, 0);
+ overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr);
unlock_timer(timr, flags);
return overrun;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 02/20] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 02/20] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-01 12:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-01 20:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2024-11-01 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> The handling of the timer overrun in the signal code is inconsistent as it
> takes previous overruns into account. This is just wrong as after the
> reprogramming of a timer the overrun count starts over from a clean state,
> i.e. 0.
>
> Don't touch info::si_overrun in send_sigqueue() and only store the overrun
> value at signal delivery time, which is computed from the timer itself
> relative to the expiry time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> V6: Fold the timer_overrun_to_int() cleanup from Frederic and remove all
> overrun fiddling from the signal path.
> ---
> kernel/signal.c | 6 ------
> kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> ---
>
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1968,15 +1968,9 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, st
>
> ret = 0;
> if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
> - /*
> - * If an SI_TIMER entry is already queue just increment
> - * the overrun count.
> - */
> - q->info.si_overrun++;
> result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
> goto out;
> }
> - q->info.si_overrun = 0;
So it's not cleared anymore on signal queue?
Not sure if it's a big problem but if an interval timer gets a signal with
overruns and then the timer is reset later as non interval, the resulting
upcoming signals will still carry the previous non-zero overruns?
However it's better to keep the overrun update on a single place so
perhaps this?
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
index 66ed49efc02f..f06c52731d65 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -282,6 +282,8 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info)
++timr->it_signal_seq;
info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr);
+ } else {
+ info->si_overrun = 0;
}
ret = true;
Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 02/20] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible
2024-11-01 12:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2024-11-01 20:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 19:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-11-01 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 13:51, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
>> @@ -1968,15 +1968,9 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, st
>>
>> ret = 0;
>> if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
>> - /*
>> - * If an SI_TIMER entry is already queue just increment
>> - * the overrun count.
>> - */
>> - q->info.si_overrun++;
>> result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> - q->info.si_overrun = 0;
>
> So it's not cleared anymore on signal queue?
>
> Not sure if it's a big problem but if an interval timer gets a signal with
> overruns and then the timer is reset later as non interval, the resulting
> upcoming signals will still carry the previous non-zero overruns?
Duh. Yes.
> However it's better to keep the overrun update on a single place so
> perhaps this?
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> index 66ed49efc02f..f06c52731d65 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,8 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info)
> ++timr->it_signal_seq;
>
> info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr);
> + } else {
> + info->si_overrun = 0;
> }
> ret = true;
>
> Other than that:
Let me fold that.
> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 02/20] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible
2024-11-01 20:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-02 19:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 22:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-11-02 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 21:36, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 13:51, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
>>> @@ -1968,15 +1968,9 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, st
>>>
>>> ret = 0;
>>> if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
>>> - /*
>>> - * If an SI_TIMER entry is already queue just increment
>>> - * the overrun count.
>>> - */
>>> - q->info.si_overrun++;
>>> result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>> - q->info.si_overrun = 0;
>>
>> So it's not cleared anymore on signal queue?
>>
>> Not sure if it's a big problem but if an interval timer gets a signal with
>> overruns and then the timer is reset later as non interval, the resulting
>> upcoming signals will still carry the previous non-zero overruns?
>
> Duh. Yes.
>
>> However it's better to keep the overrun update on a single place so
>> perhaps this?
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
>> index 66ed49efc02f..f06c52731d65 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
>> @@ -282,6 +282,8 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info)
>> ++timr->it_signal_seq;
>>
>> info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr);
>> + } else {
>> + info->si_overrun = 0;
>> }
>> ret = true;
>>
>> Other than that:
>
> Let me fold that.
Actually no. info is the siginfo which was allocated by the signal
delivery code on stack.
collect_signal() copies timer->sigqueue.info into that siginfo
struct. As timer->sigqueue.info.si_overrun is zero and never written to,
this else path is pointless.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 02/20] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible
2024-11-02 19:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-02 22:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2024-11-02 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
Le Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 08:41:53PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 21:36, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 13:51, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >> Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> >>> @@ -1968,15 +1968,9 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, st
> >>>
> >>> ret = 0;
> >>> if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
> >>> - /*
> >>> - * If an SI_TIMER entry is already queue just increment
> >>> - * the overrun count.
> >>> - */
> >>> - q->info.si_overrun++;
> >>> result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
> >>> goto out;
> >>> }
> >>> - q->info.si_overrun = 0;
> >>
> >> So it's not cleared anymore on signal queue?
> >>
> >> Not sure if it's a big problem but if an interval timer gets a signal with
> >> overruns and then the timer is reset later as non interval, the resulting
> >> upcoming signals will still carry the previous non-zero overruns?
> >
> > Duh. Yes.
> >
> >> However it's better to keep the overrun update on a single place so
> >> perhaps this?
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> >> index 66ed49efc02f..f06c52731d65 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> >> @@ -282,6 +282,8 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info)
> >> ++timr->it_signal_seq;
> >>
> >> info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr);
> >> + } else {
> >> + info->si_overrun = 0;
> >> }
> >> ret = true;
> >>
> >> Other than that:
> >
> > Let me fold that.
>
> Actually no. info is the siginfo which was allocated by the signal
> delivery code on stack.
>
> collect_signal() copies timer->sigqueue.info into that siginfo
> struct. As timer->sigqueue.info.si_overrun is zero and never written to,
> this else path is pointless.
Good point, thanks for pointing out!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* [patch v6 03/20] posix-cpu-timers: Cleanup the firing logic
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 01/20] posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistent Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 02/20] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 13:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 04/20] posix-cpu-timers: Use dedicated flag for CPU timer nanosleep Thomas Gleixner
` (16 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
The firing flag of a posix CPU timer is tristate:
0: when the timer is not about to deliver a signal
1: when the timer has expired, but the signal has not been delivered yet
-1: when the timer was queued for signal delivery and a rearm operation
raced against it and supressed the signal delivery.
This is a pointless exercise as this can be simply expressed with a
boolean. Only if set, the signal is delivered. This makes delete and rearm
consistent with the rest of the posix timers.
Convert firing to bool and fixup the usage sites accordingly and add
comments why the timer cannot be dequeued right away.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
V6: New patch after detecting the tristate mismatch vs. bool from the
patch which introduced the nanosleep flag.
---
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 2 +-
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct cpu_timer {
struct timerqueue_head *head;
struct pid *pid;
struct list_head elist;
- int firing;
+ bool firing;
struct task_struct __rcu *handling;
};
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -494,6 +494,13 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_del(struct k_
WARN_ON_ONCE(ctmr->head || timerqueue_node_queued(&ctmr->node));
} else {
if (timer->it.cpu.firing) {
+ /*
+ * Prevent signal delivery. The timer cannot be dequeued
+ * because it is on the firing list which is not protected
+ * by sighand->lock. The delivery path is waiting for
+ * the timer lock. So go back, unlock and retry.
+ */
+ timer->it.cpu.firing = false;
ret = TIMER_RETRY;
} else {
disarm_timer(timer, p);
@@ -668,7 +675,13 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_
old_expires = cpu_timer_getexpires(ctmr);
if (unlikely(timer->it.cpu.firing)) {
- timer->it.cpu.firing = -1;
+ /*
+ * Prevent signal delivery. The timer cannot be dequeued
+ * because it is on the firing list which is not protected
+ * by sighand->lock. The delivery path is waiting for
+ * the timer lock. So go back, unlock and retry.
+ */
+ timer->it.cpu.firing = false;
ret = TIMER_RETRY;
} else {
cpu_timer_dequeue(ctmr);
@@ -809,7 +822,7 @@ static u64 collect_timerqueue(struct tim
if (++i == MAX_COLLECTED || now < expires)
return expires;
- ctmr->firing = 1;
+ ctmr->firing = true;
/* See posix_cpu_timer_wait_running() */
rcu_assign_pointer(ctmr->handling, current);
cpu_timer_dequeue(ctmr);
@@ -1364,7 +1377,7 @@ static void handle_posix_cpu_timers(stru
* timer call will interfere.
*/
list_for_each_entry_safe(timer, next, &firing, it.cpu.elist) {
- int cpu_firing;
+ bool cpu_firing;
/*
* spin_lock() is sufficient here even independent of the
@@ -1376,13 +1389,13 @@ static void handle_posix_cpu_timers(stru
spin_lock(&timer->it_lock);
list_del_init(&timer->it.cpu.elist);
cpu_firing = timer->it.cpu.firing;
- timer->it.cpu.firing = 0;
+ timer->it.cpu.firing = false;
/*
- * The firing flag is -1 if we collided with a reset
- * of the timer, which already reported this
- * almost-firing as an overrun. So don't generate an event.
+ * If the firing flag is cleared then this raced with a
+ * timer rearm/delete operation. So don't generate an
+ * event.
*/
- if (likely(cpu_firing >= 0))
+ if (likely(cpu_firing))
cpu_timer_fire(timer);
/* See posix_cpu_timer_wait_running() */
rcu_assign_pointer(timer->it.cpu.handling, NULL);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 03/20] posix-cpu-timers: Cleanup the firing logic
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 03/20] posix-cpu-timers: Cleanup the firing logic Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-01 13:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2024-11-01 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:26PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> The firing flag of a posix CPU timer is tristate:
>
> 0: when the timer is not about to deliver a signal
>
> 1: when the timer has expired, but the signal has not been delivered yet
>
> -1: when the timer was queued for signal delivery and a rearm operation
> raced against it and supressed the signal delivery.
>
> This is a pointless exercise as this can be simply expressed with a
> boolean. Only if set, the signal is delivered. This makes delete and rearm
> consistent with the rest of the posix timers.
>
> Convert firing to bool and fixup the usage sites accordingly and add
> comments why the timer cannot be dequeued right away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* [patch v6 04/20] posix-cpu-timers: Use dedicated flag for CPU timer nanosleep
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 03/20] posix-cpu-timers: Cleanup the firing logic Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 05/20] posix-timers: Add a refcount to struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
` (15 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
POSIX CPU timer nanosleep creates a k_itimer on stack and uses the sigq
pointer to detect the nanosleep case in the expiry function.
Prepare for embedding sigqueue into struct k_itimer by using a dedicated
flag for nanosleep.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 2 ++
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static inline int clockid_to_fd(const cl
* @pid: Pointer to target task PID
* @elist: List head for the expiry list
* @firing: Timer is currently firing
+ * @nanosleep: Timer is used for nanosleep and is not a regular posix-timer
* @handling: Pointer to the task which handles expiry
*/
struct cpu_timer {
@@ -50,6 +51,7 @@ struct cpu_timer {
struct pid *pid;
struct list_head elist;
bool firing;
+ bool nanosleep;
struct task_struct __rcu *handling;
};
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static void cpu_timer_fire(struct k_itim
timer->it_status = POSIX_TIMER_DISARMED;
- if (unlikely(timer->sigq == NULL)) {
+ if (unlikely(ctmr->nanosleep)) {
/*
* This a special case for clock_nanosleep,
* not a normal timer from sys_timer_create.
@@ -1492,6 +1492,7 @@ static int do_cpu_nanosleep(const clocki
timer.it_overrun = -1;
error = posix_cpu_timer_create(&timer);
timer.it_process = current;
+ timer.it.cpu.nanosleep = true;
if (!error) {
static struct itimerspec64 zero_it;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* [patch v6 05/20] posix-timers: Add a refcount to struct k_itimer
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 04/20] posix-cpu-timers: Use dedicated flag for CPU timer nanosleep Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 06/20] signal: Split up __sigqueue_alloc() Thomas Gleixner
` (14 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
To cure the SIG_IGN handling for posix interval timers, the preallocated
sigqueue needs to be embedded into struct k_itimer to prevent life time
races of all sorts.
To make that work correctly it needs reference counting so that timer
deletion does not free the timer prematuraly when there is a signal queued
or delivered concurrently.
Add a rcuref to the posix timer part.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 7 ++++---
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -6,11 +6,13 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/posix-timers_types.h>
+#include <linux/rcuref.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/timerqueue.h>
struct kernel_siginfo;
struct task_struct;
+struct k_itimer;
static inline clockid_t make_process_cpuclock(const unsigned int pid,
const clockid_t clock)
@@ -105,6 +107,7 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_rt_wa
void posixtimer_rearm_itimer(struct task_struct *p);
bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info);
+void posixtimer_free_timer(struct k_itimer *timer);
/* Init task static initializer */
#define INIT_CPU_TIMERBASE(b) { \
@@ -129,6 +132,7 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_group
u64 cpu_limit) { }
static inline void posixtimer_rearm_itimer(struct task_struct *p) { }
static inline bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info) { return false; }
+static inline void posixtimer_free_timer(struct k_itimer *timer) { }
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK
@@ -156,6 +160,7 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_init_
* @it_signal: Pointer to the creators signal struct
* @it_pid: The pid of the process/task targeted by the signal
* @it_process: The task to wakeup on clock_nanosleep (CPU timers)
+ * @rcuref: Reference count for life time management
* @sigq: Pointer to preallocated sigqueue
* @it: Union representing the various posix timer type
* internals.
@@ -180,6 +185,7 @@ struct k_itimer {
struct task_struct *it_process;
};
struct sigqueue *sigq;
+ rcuref_t rcuref;
union {
struct {
struct hrtimer timer;
@@ -200,4 +206,12 @@ void set_process_cpu_timer(struct task_s
int update_rlimit_cpu(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long rlim_new);
+#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS
+static inline void posixtimer_putref(struct k_itimer *tmr)
+{
+ if (rcuref_put(&tmr->rcuref))
+ posixtimer_free_timer(tmr);
+}
+#endif /* !CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS */
+
#endif
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -417,10 +417,11 @@ static struct k_itimer * alloc_posix_tim
return NULL;
}
clear_siginfo(&tmr->sigq->info);
+ rcuref_init(&tmr->rcuref, 1);
return tmr;
}
-static void posix_timer_free(struct k_itimer *tmr)
+void posixtimer_free_timer(struct k_itimer *tmr)
{
put_pid(tmr->it_pid);
sigqueue_free(tmr->sigq);
@@ -432,7 +433,7 @@ static void posix_timer_unhash_and_free(
spin_lock(&hash_lock);
hlist_del_rcu(&tmr->t_hash);
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
- posix_timer_free(tmr);
+ posixtimer_putref(tmr);
}
static int common_timer_create(struct k_itimer *new_timer)
@@ -467,7 +468,7 @@ static int do_timer_create(clockid_t whi
*/
new_timer_id = posix_timer_add(new_timer);
if (new_timer_id < 0) {
- posix_timer_free(new_timer);
+ posixtimer_free_timer(new_timer);
return new_timer_id;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* [patch v6 06/20] signal: Split up __sigqueue_alloc()
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 05/20] posix-timers: Add a refcount to struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 07/20] signal: Provide posixtimer_sigqueue_init() Thomas Gleixner
` (13 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
To cure the SIG_IGN handling for posix interval timers, the preallocated
sigqueue needs to be embedded into struct k_itimer to prevent life time
races of all sorts.
Reorganize __sigqueue_alloc() so the ucounts retrieval and the
initialization can be used independently.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/signal.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index a99274287902..87c349a2ddf7 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -396,16 +396,9 @@ void task_join_group_stop(struct task_struct *task)
task_set_jobctl_pending(task, mask | JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING);
}
-/*
- * allocate a new signal queue record
- * - this may be called without locks if and only if t == current, otherwise an
- * appropriate lock must be held to stop the target task from exiting
- */
-static struct sigqueue *
-__sigqueue_alloc(int sig, struct task_struct *t, gfp_t gfp_flags,
- int override_rlimit, const unsigned int sigqueue_flags)
+static struct ucounts *sig_get_ucounts(struct task_struct *t, int sig,
+ int override_rlimit)
{
- struct sigqueue *q = NULL;
struct ucounts *ucounts;
long sigpending;
@@ -424,19 +417,44 @@ __sigqueue_alloc(int sig, struct task_struct *t, gfp_t gfp_flags,
if (!sigpending)
return NULL;
- if (override_rlimit || likely(sigpending <= task_rlimit(t, RLIMIT_SIGPENDING))) {
- q = kmem_cache_alloc(sigqueue_cachep, gfp_flags);
- } else {
+ if (unlikely(!override_rlimit && sigpending > task_rlimit(t, RLIMIT_SIGPENDING))) {
+ dec_rlimit_put_ucounts(ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_SIGPENDING);
print_dropped_signal(sig);
+ return NULL;
}
- if (unlikely(q == NULL)) {
+ return ucounts;
+}
+
+static void __sigqueue_init(struct sigqueue *q, struct ucounts *ucounts,
+ const unsigned int sigqueue_flags)
+{
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->list);
+ q->flags = sigqueue_flags;
+ q->ucounts = ucounts;
+}
+
+/*
+ * allocate a new signal queue record
+ * - this may be called without locks if and only if t == current, otherwise an
+ * appropriate lock must be held to stop the target task from exiting
+ */
+static struct sigqueue *__sigqueue_alloc(int sig, struct task_struct *t, gfp_t gfp_flags,
+ int override_rlimit, const unsigned int sigqueue_flags)
+{
+ struct ucounts *ucounts = sig_get_ucounts(t, sig, override_rlimit);
+ struct sigqueue *q;
+
+ if (!ucounts)
+ return NULL;
+
+ q = kmem_cache_alloc(sigqueue_cachep, gfp_flags);
+ if (!q) {
dec_rlimit_put_ucounts(ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_SIGPENDING);
- } else {
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->list);
- q->flags = sigqueue_flags;
- q->ucounts = ucounts;
+ return NULL;
}
+
+ __sigqueue_init(q, ucounts, sigqueue_flags);
return q;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* [patch v6 07/20] signal: Provide posixtimer_sigqueue_init()
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 06/20] signal: Split up __sigqueue_alloc() Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 08/20] posix-timers: Store PID type in the timer Thomas Gleixner
` (12 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
To cure the SIG_IGN handling for posix interval timers, the preallocated
sigqueue needs to be embedded into struct k_itimer to prevent life time
races of all sorts.
Provide a new function to initialize the embedded sigqueue to prepare for
that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 2 ++
kernel/signal.c | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
---
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
struct kernel_siginfo;
struct task_struct;
+struct sigqueue;
struct k_itimer;
static inline clockid_t make_process_cpuclock(const unsigned int pid,
@@ -106,6 +107,7 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_rt_wa
}
void posixtimer_rearm_itimer(struct task_struct *p);
+bool posixtimer_init_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q);
bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info);
void posixtimer_free_timer(struct k_itimer *timer);
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1905,6 +1905,17 @@ void flush_itimer_signals(void)
__flush_itimer_signals(&tsk->signal->shared_pending);
}
+bool posixtimer_init_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q)
+{
+ struct ucounts *ucounts = sig_get_ucounts(current, -1, 0);
+
+ if (!ucounts)
+ return false;
+ clear_siginfo(&q->info);
+ __sigqueue_init(q, ucounts, SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC);
+ return true;
+}
+
struct sigqueue *sigqueue_alloc(void)
{
return __sigqueue_alloc(-1, current, GFP_KERNEL, 0, SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* [patch v6 08/20] posix-timers: Store PID type in the timer
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 07/20] signal: Provide posixtimer_sigqueue_init() Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 09/20] signal: Refactor send_sigqueue() Thomas Gleixner
` (11 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
instead of re-evaluating the signal delivery mode everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 2 ++
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 9 ++++++---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <linux/alarmtimer.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/pid.h>
#include <linux/posix-timers_types.h>
#include <linux/rcuref.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
@@ -180,6 +181,7 @@ struct k_itimer {
s64 it_overrun_last;
unsigned int it_signal_seq;
int it_sigev_notify;
+ enum pid_type it_pid_type;
ktime_t it_interval;
struct signal_struct *it_signal;
union {
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -298,7 +298,6 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct ke
int posix_timer_queue_signal(struct k_itimer *timr)
{
enum posix_timer_state state = POSIX_TIMER_DISARMED;
- enum pid_type type;
int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&timr->it_lock);
@@ -308,8 +307,7 @@ int posix_timer_queue_signal(struct k_it
timr->it_status = state;
- type = !(timr->it_sigev_notify & SIGEV_THREAD_ID) ? PIDTYPE_TGID : PIDTYPE_PID;
- ret = send_sigqueue(timr->sigq, timr->it_pid, type, timr->it_signal_seq);
+ ret = send_sigqueue(timr->sigq, timr->it_pid, timr->it_pid_type, timr->it_signal_seq);
/* If we failed to send the signal the timer stops. */
return ret > 0;
}
@@ -496,6 +494,11 @@ static int do_timer_create(clockid_t whi
new_timer->it_pid = get_pid(task_tgid(current));
}
+ if (new_timer->it_sigev_notify & SIGEV_THREAD_ID)
+ new_timer->it_pid_type = PIDTYPE_PID;
+ else
+ new_timer->it_pid_type = PIDTYPE_TGID;
+
new_timer->sigq->info.si_tid = new_timer->it_id;
new_timer->sigq->info.si_code = SI_TIMER;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* [patch v6 09/20] signal: Refactor send_sigqueue()
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 08/20] posix-timers: Store PID type in the timer Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 10/20] signal: Replace resched_timer logic Thomas Gleixner
` (10 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
To handle posix timers which have their signal ignored via SIG_IGN properly
it is required to requeue a ignored signal for delivery when SIG_IGN is
lifted so the timer gets rearmed.
Split the required code out of send_sigqueue() so it can be reused in
context of sigaction().
While at it rename send_sigqueue() to posixtimer_send_sigqueue() so its
clear what this is about.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 1
include/linux/sched/signal.h | 1
kernel/signal.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 2 -
4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
---
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_rt_wa
void posixtimer_rearm_itimer(struct task_struct *p);
bool posixtimer_init_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q);
+int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_itimer *tmr);
bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info);
void posixtimer_free_timer(struct k_itimer *timer);
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -340,7 +340,6 @@ extern int send_sig(int, struct task_str
extern int zap_other_threads(struct task_struct *p);
extern struct sigqueue *sigqueue_alloc(void);
extern void sigqueue_free(struct sigqueue *);
-extern int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *, struct pid *, enum pid_type, int si_private);
extern int do_sigaction(int, struct k_sigaction *, struct k_sigaction *);
static inline void clear_notify_signal(void)
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1947,40 +1947,54 @@ void sigqueue_free(struct sigqueue *q)
__sigqueue_free(q);
}
-int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct pid *pid, enum pid_type type, int si_private)
+static void posixtimer_queue_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *t, enum pid_type type)
{
- int sig = q->info.si_signo;
struct sigpending *pending;
+ int sig = q->info.si_signo;
+
+ signalfd_notify(t, sig);
+ pending = (type != PIDTYPE_PID) ? &t->signal->shared_pending : &t->pending;
+ list_add_tail(&q->list, &pending->list);
+ sigaddset(&pending->signal, sig);
+ complete_signal(sig, t, type);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function is used by POSIX timers to deliver a timer signal.
+ * Where type is PIDTYPE_PID (such as for timers with SIGEV_THREAD_ID
+ * set), the signal must be delivered to the specific thread (queues
+ * into t->pending).
+ *
+ * Where type is not PIDTYPE_PID, signals must be delivered to the
+ * process. In this case, prefer to deliver to current if it is in
+ * the same thread group as the target process, which avoids
+ * unnecessarily waking up a potentially idle task.
+ */
+static inline struct task_struct *posixtimer_get_target(struct k_itimer *tmr)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t = pid_task(tmr->it_pid, tmr->it_pid_type);
+
+ if (t && tmr->it_pid_type != PIDTYPE_PID && same_thread_group(t, current))
+ t = current;
+ return t;
+}
+
+int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_itimer *tmr)
+{
+ struct sigqueue *q = tmr->sigq;
+ int sig = q->info.si_signo;
struct task_struct *t;
unsigned long flags;
int ret, result;
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC)))
- return 0;
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(q->info.si_code != SI_TIMER))
- return 0;
+ guard(rcu)();
- ret = -1;
- rcu_read_lock();
-
- /*
- * This function is used by POSIX timers to deliver a timer signal.
- * Where type is PIDTYPE_PID (such as for timers with SIGEV_THREAD_ID
- * set), the signal must be delivered to the specific thread (queues
- * into t->pending).
- *
- * Where type is not PIDTYPE_PID, signals must be delivered to the
- * process. In this case, prefer to deliver to current if it is in
- * the same thread group as the target process, which avoids
- * unnecessarily waking up a potentially idle task.
- */
- t = pid_task(pid, type);
+ t = posixtimer_get_target(tmr);
if (!t)
- goto ret;
- if (type != PIDTYPE_PID && same_thread_group(t, current))
- t = current;
+ return -1;
+
if (!likely(lock_task_sighand(t, &flags)))
- goto ret;
+ return -1;
/*
* Update @q::info::si_sys_private for posix timer signals with
@@ -1988,30 +2002,24 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, st
* decides based on si_sys_private whether to invoke
* posixtimer_rearm() or not.
*/
- q->info.si_sys_private = si_private;
+ q->info.si_sys_private = tmr->it_signal_seq;
ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
- result = TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED;
- if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, false))
+ if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, false)) {
+ result = TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED;
goto out;
+ }
ret = 0;
if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
goto out;
}
-
- signalfd_notify(t, sig);
- pending = (type != PIDTYPE_PID) ? &t->signal->shared_pending : &t->pending;
- list_add_tail(&q->list, &pending->list);
- sigaddset(&pending->signal, sig);
- complete_signal(sig, t, type);
+ posixtimer_queue_sigqueue(q, t, tmr->it_pid_type);
result = TRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVERED;
out:
- trace_signal_generate(sig, &q->info, t, type != PIDTYPE_PID, result);
+ trace_signal_generate(sig, &q->info, t, tmr->it_pid_type != PIDTYPE_PID, result);
unlock_task_sighand(t, &flags);
-ret:
- rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS */
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ int posix_timer_queue_signal(struct k_it
timr->it_status = state;
- ret = send_sigqueue(timr->sigq, timr->it_pid, timr->it_pid_type, timr->it_signal_seq);
+ ret = posixtimer_send_sigqueue(timr);
/* If we failed to send the signal the timer stops. */
return ret > 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* [patch v6 10/20] signal: Replace resched_timer logic
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 09/20] signal: Refactor send_sigqueue() Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 13:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 11/20] posix-timers: Embed sigqueue in struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
` (9 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
In preparation for handling ignored posix timer signals correctly and
embedding the sigqueue struct into struct k_itimer, hand down a pointer to
the sigqueue struct into posix_timer_deliver_signal() instead of just
having a boolean flag.
No functional change.
Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
V6: NULLify timer_sigq after again: in dequeue_signal() - Frederic
V5: New patch
---
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 5 +++--
kernel/signal.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_rt_wa
void posixtimer_rearm_itimer(struct task_struct *p);
bool posixtimer_init_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q);
int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_itimer *tmr);
-bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info);
+bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info, struct sigqueue *timer_sigq);
void posixtimer_free_timer(struct k_itimer *timer);
/* Init task static initializer */
@@ -135,7 +135,8 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_init(
static inline void posix_cputimers_group_init(struct posix_cputimers *pct,
u64 cpu_limit) { }
static inline void posixtimer_rearm_itimer(struct task_struct *p) { }
-static inline bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info) { return false; }
+static inline bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info,
+ struct sigqueue *timer_sigq) { return false; }
static inline void posixtimer_free_timer(struct k_itimer *timer) { }
#endif
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ bool unhandled_signal(struct task_struct
}
static void collect_signal(int sig, struct sigpending *list, kernel_siginfo_t *info,
- bool *resched_timer)
+ struct sigqueue **timer_sigq)
{
struct sigqueue *q, *first = NULL;
@@ -568,10 +568,17 @@ static void collect_signal(int sig, stru
list_del_init(&first->list);
copy_siginfo(info, &first->info);
- *resched_timer = (first->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) &&
- (info->si_code == SI_TIMER);
-
- __sigqueue_free(first);
+ /*
+ * posix-timer signals are preallocated and freed when the
+ * timer goes away. Either directly or by clearing
+ * SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC so that the next delivery will free
+ * them. Spare the extra round through __sigqueue_free()
+ * which is ignoring preallocated signals.
+ */
+ if (unlikely((first->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) && (info->si_code == SI_TIMER)))
+ *timer_sigq = first;
+ else
+ __sigqueue_free(first);
} else {
/*
* Ok, it wasn't in the queue. This must be
@@ -588,12 +595,12 @@ static void collect_signal(int sig, stru
}
static int __dequeue_signal(struct sigpending *pending, sigset_t *mask,
- kernel_siginfo_t *info, bool *resched_timer)
+ kernel_siginfo_t *info, struct sigqueue **timer_sigq)
{
int sig = next_signal(pending, mask);
if (sig)
- collect_signal(sig, pending, info, resched_timer);
+ collect_signal(sig, pending, info, timer_sigq);
return sig;
}
@@ -605,18 +612,19 @@ static int __dequeue_signal(struct sigpe
int dequeue_signal(sigset_t *mask, kernel_siginfo_t *info, enum pid_type *type)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
- bool resched_timer = false;
+ struct sigqueue *timer_sigq;
int signr;
lockdep_assert_held(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
again:
*type = PIDTYPE_PID;
- signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->pending, mask, info, &resched_timer);
+ timer_sigq = NULL;
+ signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->pending, mask, info, &timer_sigq);
if (!signr) {
*type = PIDTYPE_TGID;
signr = __dequeue_signal(&tsk->signal->shared_pending,
- mask, info, &resched_timer);
+ mask, info, &timer_sigq);
if (unlikely(signr == SIGALRM))
posixtimer_rearm_itimer(tsk);
@@ -642,8 +650,8 @@ int dequeue_signal(sigset_t *mask, kerne
current->jobctl |= JOBCTL_STOP_DEQUEUED;
}
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS) && unlikely(resched_timer)) {
- if (!posixtimer_deliver_signal(info))
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS) && unlikely(timer_sigq)) {
+ if (!posixtimer_deliver_signal(info, timer_sigq))
goto again;
}
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static void common_hrtimer_rearm(struct
* This function is called from the signal delivery code. It decides
* whether the signal should be dropped and rearms interval timers.
*/
-bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info)
+bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info, struct sigqueue *timer_sigq)
{
struct k_itimer *timr;
unsigned long flags;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 10/20] signal: Replace resched_timer logic
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 10/20] signal: Replace resched_timer logic Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-01 13:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2024-11-01 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:35PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> In preparation for handling ignored posix timer signals correctly and
> embedding the sigqueue struct into struct k_itimer, hand down a pointer to
> the sigqueue struct into posix_timer_deliver_signal() instead of just
> having a boolean flag.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* [patch v6 11/20] posix-timers: Embed sigqueue in struct k_itimer
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 10/20] signal: Replace resched_timer logic Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 12/20] signal: Cleanup unused posix-timer leftovers Thomas Gleixner
` (8 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To cure the SIG_IGN handling for posix interval timers, the preallocated
sigqueue needs to be embedded into struct k_itimer to prevent life time
races of all sorts.
Now that the prerequisites are in place, embed the sigqueue into struct
k_itimer and fixup the relevant usage sites.
Aside of preparing for proper SIG_IGN handling, this spares an extra
allocation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
V6: Split out the timer related part from the delivery function to
use guard() and avoid gotos
---
fs/proc/base.c | 4 -
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 23 ++++++++++-
kernel/signal.c | 19 +++++----
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
4 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
---
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -2553,8 +2553,8 @@ static int show_timer(struct seq_file *m
seq_printf(m, "ID: %d\n", timer->it_id);
seq_printf(m, "signal: %d/%px\n",
- timer->sigq->info.si_signo,
- timer->sigq->info.si_value.sival_ptr);
+ timer->sigq.info.si_signo,
+ timer->sigq.info.si_value.sival_ptr);
seq_printf(m, "notify: %s/%s.%d\n",
nstr[notify & ~SIGEV_THREAD_ID],
(notify & SIGEV_THREAD_ID) ? "tid" : "pid",
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ static inline int clockid_to_fd(const cl
#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS
+#include <linux/signal_types.h>
+
/**
* cpu_timer - Posix CPU timer representation for k_itimer
* @node: timerqueue node to queue in the task/sig
@@ -166,7 +168,7 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_init_
* @it_pid: The pid of the process/task targeted by the signal
* @it_process: The task to wakeup on clock_nanosleep (CPU timers)
* @rcuref: Reference count for life time management
- * @sigq: Pointer to preallocated sigqueue
+ * @sigq: Embedded sigqueue
* @it: Union representing the various posix timer type
* internals.
* @rcu: RCU head for freeing the timer.
@@ -190,7 +192,7 @@ struct k_itimer {
struct pid *it_pid;
struct task_struct *it_process;
};
- struct sigqueue *sigq;
+ struct sigqueue sigq;
rcuref_t rcuref;
union {
struct {
@@ -218,6 +220,23 @@ static inline void posixtimer_putref(str
if (rcuref_put(&tmr->rcuref))
posixtimer_free_timer(tmr);
}
+
+static inline void posixtimer_sigqueue_getref(struct sigqueue *q)
+{
+ struct k_itimer *tmr = container_of(q, struct k_itimer, sigq);
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcuref_get(&tmr->rcuref));
+}
+
+static inline void posixtimer_sigqueue_putref(struct sigqueue *q)
+{
+ struct k_itimer *tmr = container_of(q, struct k_itimer, sigq);
+
+ posixtimer_putref(tmr);
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS */
+static inline void posixtimer_sigqueue_getref(struct sigqueue *q) { }
+static inline void posixtimer_sigqueue_putref(struct sigqueue *q) { }
#endif /* !CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS */
#endif
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -460,8 +460,10 @@ static struct sigqueue *__sigqueue_alloc
static void __sigqueue_free(struct sigqueue *q)
{
- if (q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC)
+ if (q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) {
+ posixtimer_sigqueue_putref(q);
return;
+ }
if (q->ucounts) {
dec_rlimit_put_ucounts(q->ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_SIGPENDING);
q->ucounts = NULL;
@@ -569,11 +571,11 @@ static void collect_signal(int sig, stru
copy_siginfo(info, &first->info);
/*
- * posix-timer signals are preallocated and freed when the
- * timer goes away. Either directly or by clearing
- * SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC so that the next delivery will free
- * them. Spare the extra round through __sigqueue_free()
- * which is ignoring preallocated signals.
+ * posix-timer signals are preallocated and freed when the last
+ * reference count is dropped in posixtimer_deliver_signal() or
+ * immediately on timer deletion when the signal is not pending.
+ * Spare the extra round through __sigqueue_free() which is
+ * ignoring preallocated signals.
*/
if (unlikely((first->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) && (info->si_code == SI_TIMER)))
*timer_sigq = first;
@@ -1989,7 +1991,7 @@ static inline struct task_struct *posixt
int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_itimer *tmr)
{
- struct sigqueue *q = tmr->sigq;
+ struct sigqueue *q = &tmr->sigq;
int sig = q->info.si_signo;
struct task_struct *t;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -2020,9 +2022,12 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
ret = 0;
if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
+ /* This holds a reference count already */
result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
goto out;
}
+
+ posixtimer_sigqueue_getref(q);
posixtimer_queue_sigqueue(q, t, tmr->it_pid_type);
result = TRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVERED;
out:
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -250,15 +250,40 @@ static void common_hrtimer_rearm(struct
hrtimer_restart(timer);
}
+static bool __posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info, struct k_itimer *timr)
+{
+ guard(spinlock)(&timr->it_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * Check if the timer is still alive or whether it got modified
+ * since the signal was queued. In either case, don't rearm and
+ * drop the signal.
+ */
+ if (timr->it_signal_seq != info->si_sys_private || WARN_ON_ONCE(!timr->it_signal))
+ return false;
+
+ if (!timr->it_interval || WARN_ON_ONCE(timr->it_status != POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING))
+ return true;
+
+ timr->kclock->timer_rearm(timr);
+ timr->it_status = POSIX_TIMER_ARMED;
+ timr->it_overrun_last = timr->it_overrun;
+ timr->it_overrun = -1LL;
+ ++timr->it_signal_seq;
+ info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr);
+ return true;
+}
+
/*
* This function is called from the signal delivery code. It decides
- * whether the signal should be dropped and rearms interval timers.
+ * whether the signal should be dropped and rearms interval timers. The
+ * timer can be unconditionally accessed as there is a reference held on
+ * it.
*/
bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info, struct sigqueue *timer_sigq)
{
- struct k_itimer *timr;
- unsigned long flags;
- bool ret = false;
+ struct k_itimer *timr = container_of(timer_sigq, struct k_itimer, sigq);
+ bool ret;
/*
* Release siglock to ensure proper locking order versus
@@ -266,28 +291,11 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct ke
*/
spin_unlock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
- timr = lock_timer(info->si_tid, &flags);
- if (!timr)
- goto out;
-
- if (timr->it_signal_seq != info->si_sys_private)
- goto out_unlock;
-
- if (timr->it_interval && !WARN_ON_ONCE(timr->it_status != POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING)) {
- timr->kclock->timer_rearm(timr);
+ ret = __posixtimer_deliver_signal(info, timr);
- timr->it_status = POSIX_TIMER_ARMED;
- timr->it_overrun_last = timr->it_overrun;
- timr->it_overrun = -1LL;
- ++timr->it_signal_seq;
-
- info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr);
- }
- ret = true;
+ /* Drop the reference which was acquired when the signal was queued */
+ posixtimer_putref(timr);
-out_unlock:
- unlock_timer(timr, flags);
-out:
spin_lock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
/* Don't expose the si_sys_private value to userspace */
@@ -404,17 +412,17 @@ static struct pid *good_sigevent(sigeven
}
}
-static struct k_itimer * alloc_posix_timer(void)
+static struct k_itimer *alloc_posix_timer(void)
{
struct k_itimer *tmr = kmem_cache_zalloc(posix_timers_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tmr)
return tmr;
- if (unlikely(!(tmr->sigq = sigqueue_alloc()))) {
+
+ if (unlikely(!posixtimer_init_sigqueue(&tmr->sigq))) {
kmem_cache_free(posix_timers_cache, tmr);
return NULL;
}
- clear_siginfo(&tmr->sigq->info);
rcuref_init(&tmr->rcuref, 1);
return tmr;
}
@@ -422,7 +430,8 @@ static struct k_itimer * alloc_posix_tim
void posixtimer_free_timer(struct k_itimer *tmr)
{
put_pid(tmr->it_pid);
- sigqueue_free(tmr->sigq);
+ if (tmr->sigq.ucounts)
+ dec_rlimit_put_ucounts(tmr->sigq.ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_SIGPENDING);
kfree_rcu(tmr, rcu);
}
@@ -484,13 +493,13 @@ static int do_timer_create(clockid_t whi
goto out;
}
new_timer->it_sigev_notify = event->sigev_notify;
- new_timer->sigq->info.si_signo = event->sigev_signo;
- new_timer->sigq->info.si_value = event->sigev_value;
+ new_timer->sigq.info.si_signo = event->sigev_signo;
+ new_timer->sigq.info.si_value = event->sigev_value;
} else {
new_timer->it_sigev_notify = SIGEV_SIGNAL;
- new_timer->sigq->info.si_signo = SIGALRM;
- memset(&new_timer->sigq->info.si_value, 0, sizeof(sigval_t));
- new_timer->sigq->info.si_value.sival_int = new_timer->it_id;
+ new_timer->sigq.info.si_signo = SIGALRM;
+ memset(&new_timer->sigq.info.si_value, 0, sizeof(sigval_t));
+ new_timer->sigq.info.si_value.sival_int = new_timer->it_id;
new_timer->it_pid = get_pid(task_tgid(current));
}
@@ -499,8 +508,8 @@ static int do_timer_create(clockid_t whi
else
new_timer->it_pid_type = PIDTYPE_TGID;
- new_timer->sigq->info.si_tid = new_timer->it_id;
- new_timer->sigq->info.si_code = SI_TIMER;
+ new_timer->sigq.info.si_tid = new_timer->it_id;
+ new_timer->sigq.info.si_code = SI_TIMER;
if (copy_to_user(created_timer_id, &new_timer_id, sizeof (new_timer_id))) {
error = -EFAULT;
@@ -584,7 +593,14 @@ static struct k_itimer *__lock_timer(tim
* 1) Set timr::it_signal to NULL with timr::it_lock held
* 2) Release timr::it_lock
* 3) Remove from the hash under hash_lock
- * 4) Call RCU for removal after the grace period
+ * 4) Put the reference count.
+ *
+ * The reference count might not drop to zero if timr::sigq is
+ * queued. In that case the signal delivery or flush will put the
+ * last reference count.
+ *
+ * When the reference count reaches zero, the timer is scheduled
+ * for RCU removal after the grace period.
*
* Holding rcu_read_lock() accross the lookup ensures that
* the timer cannot be freed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* [patch v6 12/20] signal: Cleanup unused posix-timer leftovers
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 11/20] posix-timers: Embed sigqueue in struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 13/20] posix-timers: Move sequence logic into struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
` (7 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Remove the leftovers of sigqueue preallocation as it's not longer used.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/sched/signal.h | 2 --
kernel/signal.c | 39 ++++-----------------------------------
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
---
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -338,8 +338,6 @@ extern void force_fatal_sig(int);
extern void force_exit_sig(int);
extern int send_sig(int, struct task_struct *, int);
extern int zap_other_threads(struct task_struct *p);
-extern struct sigqueue *sigqueue_alloc(void);
-extern void sigqueue_free(struct sigqueue *);
extern int do_sigaction(int, struct k_sigaction *, struct k_sigaction *);
static inline void clear_notify_signal(void)
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -439,8 +439,8 @@ static void __sigqueue_init(struct sigqu
* - this may be called without locks if and only if t == current, otherwise an
* appropriate lock must be held to stop the target task from exiting
*/
-static struct sigqueue *__sigqueue_alloc(int sig, struct task_struct *t, gfp_t gfp_flags,
- int override_rlimit, const unsigned int sigqueue_flags)
+static struct sigqueue *sigqueue_alloc(int sig, struct task_struct *t, gfp_t gfp_flags,
+ int override_rlimit)
{
struct ucounts *ucounts = sig_get_ucounts(t, sig, override_rlimit);
struct sigqueue *q;
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static struct sigqueue *__sigqueue_alloc
return NULL;
}
- __sigqueue_init(q, ucounts, sigqueue_flags);
+ __sigqueue_init(q, ucounts, 0);
return q;
}
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ static int __send_signal_locked(int sig,
else
override_rlimit = 0;
- q = __sigqueue_alloc(sig, t, GFP_ATOMIC, override_rlimit, 0);
+ q = sigqueue_alloc(sig, t, GFP_ATOMIC, override_rlimit);
if (q) {
list_add_tail(&q->list, &pending->list);
@@ -1926,37 +1926,6 @@ bool posixtimer_init_sigqueue(struct sig
return true;
}
-struct sigqueue *sigqueue_alloc(void)
-{
- return __sigqueue_alloc(-1, current, GFP_KERNEL, 0, SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC);
-}
-
-void sigqueue_free(struct sigqueue *q)
-{
- spinlock_t *lock = ¤t->sighand->siglock;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC)))
- return;
- /*
- * We must hold ->siglock while testing q->list
- * to serialize with collect_signal() or with
- * __exit_signal()->flush_sigqueue().
- */
- spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
- q->flags &= ~SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC;
- /*
- * If it is queued it will be freed when dequeued,
- * like the "regular" sigqueue.
- */
- if (!list_empty(&q->list))
- q = NULL;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
-
- if (q)
- __sigqueue_free(q);
-}
-
static void posixtimer_queue_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *t, enum pid_type type)
{
struct sigpending *pending;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* [patch v6 13/20] posix-timers: Move sequence logic into struct k_itimer
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 12/20] signal: Cleanup unused posix-timer leftovers Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 14/20] signal: Provide ignored_posix_timers list Thomas Gleixner
` (6 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The posix timer signal handling uses siginfo::si_sys_private for handling
the sequence counter check. That indirection is not longer required and the
sequence count value at signal queueing time can be stored in struct
k_itimer itself.
This removes the requirement of treating siginfo::si_sys_private special as
it's now always zero as the kernel does not touch it anymore.
Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
V6: Update the comment in siginfo.h
V5: New patch
---
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 2 ++
include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h | 2 +-
kernel/signal.c | 8 +++-----
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 5 +----
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_init_
* @it_overrun: The overrun counter for pending signals
* @it_overrun_last: The overrun at the time of the last delivered signal
* @it_signal_seq: Sequence count to control signal delivery
+ * @it_sigqueue_seq: The sequence count at the point where the signal was queued
* @it_sigev_notify: The notify word of sigevent struct for signal delivery
* @it_interval: The interval for periodic timers
* @it_signal: Pointer to the creators signal struct
@@ -184,6 +185,7 @@ struct k_itimer {
s64 it_overrun;
s64 it_overrun_last;
unsigned int it_signal_seq;
+ unsigned int it_sigqueue_seq;
int it_sigev_notify;
enum pid_type it_pid_type;
ktime_t it_interval;
--- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
+++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ union __sifields {
__kernel_timer_t _tid; /* timer id */
int _overrun; /* overrun count */
sigval_t _sigval; /* same as below */
- int _sys_private; /* not to be passed to user */
+ int _sys_private; /* Not used by the kernel. Historic leftover. Always 0. */
} _timer;
/* POSIX.1b signals */
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1976,12 +1976,10 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
return -1;
/*
- * Update @q::info::si_sys_private for posix timer signals with
- * sighand locked to prevent a race against dequeue_signal() which
- * decides based on si_sys_private whether to invoke
- * posixtimer_rearm() or not.
+ * Update @tmr::sigqueue_seq for posix timer signals with sighand
+ * locked to prevent a race against dequeue_signal().
*/
- q->info.si_sys_private = tmr->it_signal_seq;
+ tmr->it_sigqueue_seq = tmr->it_signal_seq;
ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, false)) {
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static bool __posixtimer_deliver_signal(
* since the signal was queued. In either case, don't rearm and
* drop the signal.
*/
- if (timr->it_signal_seq != info->si_sys_private || WARN_ON_ONCE(!timr->it_signal))
+ if (timr->it_signal_seq != timr->it_sigqueue_seq || WARN_ON_ONCE(!timr->it_signal))
return false;
if (!timr->it_interval || WARN_ON_ONCE(timr->it_status != POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING))
@@ -297,9 +297,6 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct ke
posixtimer_putref(timr);
spin_lock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
-
- /* Don't expose the si_sys_private value to userspace */
- info->si_sys_private = 0;
return ret;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* [patch v6 14/20] signal: Provide ignored_posix_timers list
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 13/20] posix-timers: Move sequence logic into struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 15/20] posix-timers: Handle ignored list on delete and exit Thomas Gleixner
` (5 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To prepare for handling posix timer signals on sigaction(SIG_IGN) properly,
add a list to task::signal.
This list will be used to queue posix timers so their signal can be
requeued when SIG_IGN is lifted later.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/sched/signal.h | 1 +
init/init_task.c | 5 +++--
kernel/fork.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ struct signal_struct {
/* POSIX.1b Interval Timers */
unsigned int next_posix_timer_id;
struct hlist_head posix_timers;
+ struct hlist_head ignored_posix_timers;
/* ITIMER_REAL timer for the process */
struct hrtimer real_timer;
--- a/init/init_task.c
+++ b/init/init_task.c
@@ -30,8 +30,9 @@ static struct signal_struct init_signals
.cred_guard_mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(init_signals.cred_guard_mutex),
.exec_update_lock = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(init_signals.exec_update_lock),
#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS
- .posix_timers = HLIST_HEAD_INIT,
- .cputimer = {
+ .posix_timers = HLIST_HEAD_INIT,
+ .ignored_posix_timers = HLIST_HEAD_INIT,
+ .cputimer = {
.cputime_atomic = INIT_CPUTIME_ATOMIC,
},
#endif
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1864,6 +1864,7 @@ static int copy_signal(unsigned long clo
#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sig->posix_timers);
+ INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sig->ignored_posix_timers);
hrtimer_init(&sig->real_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
sig->real_timer.function = it_real_fn;
#endif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* [patch v6 15/20] posix-timers: Handle ignored list on delete and exit
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 14/20] signal: Provide ignored_posix_timers list Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 13:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 16/20] signal: Handle ignored signals in do_sigaction(action != SIG_IGN) Thomas Gleixner
` (4 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To handle posix timer signals on sigaction(SIG_IGN) properly, the timers
will be queued on a separate ignored list.
Add the necessary cleanup code for timer_delete() and exit_itimers().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
V6: Warn when the ignored list is not empty after deleting all timers in
exit_itimers()
---
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 4 +++-
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -152,7 +152,8 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_init_
/**
* struct k_itimer - POSIX.1b interval timer structure.
- * @list: List head for binding the timer to signals->posix_timers
+ * @list: List node for binding the timer to tsk::signal::posix_timers
+ * @ignored_list: List node for tracking ignored timers in tsk::signal::ignored_posix_timers
* @t_hash: Entry in the posix timer hash table
* @it_lock: Lock protecting the timer
* @kclock: Pointer to the k_clock struct handling this timer
@@ -176,6 +177,7 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_init_
*/
struct k_itimer {
struct hlist_node list;
+ struct hlist_node ignored_list;
struct hlist_node t_hash;
spinlock_t it_lock;
const struct k_clock *kclock;
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -1027,6 +1027,18 @@ int common_timer_del(struct k_itimer *ti
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * If the deleted timer is on the ignored list, remove it and
+ * drop the associated reference.
+ */
+static inline void posix_timer_cleanup_ignored(struct k_itimer *tmr)
+{
+ if (!hlist_unhashed(&tmr->ignored_list)) {
+ hlist_del_init(&tmr->ignored_list);
+ posixtimer_putref(tmr);
+ }
+}
+
static inline int timer_delete_hook(struct k_itimer *timer)
{
const struct k_clock *kc = timer->kclock;
@@ -1059,6 +1071,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(timer_delete, timer_t, t
spin_lock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
hlist_del(&timer->list);
+ posix_timer_cleanup_ignored(timer);
spin_unlock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
/*
* A concurrent lookup could check timer::it_signal lockless. It
@@ -1110,6 +1123,8 @@ static void itimer_delete(struct k_itime
}
hlist_del(&timer->list);
+ posix_timer_cleanup_ignored(timer);
+
/*
* Setting timer::it_signal to NULL is technically not required
* here as nothing can access the timer anymore legitimately via
@@ -1142,6 +1157,17 @@ void exit_itimers(struct task_struct *ts
/* The timers are not longer accessible via tsk::signal */
while (!hlist_empty(&timers))
itimer_delete(hlist_entry(timers.first, struct k_itimer, list));
+
+ /*
+ * There should be no timers on the ignored list. itimer_delete() has
+ * mopped them up.
+ */
+ if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!hlist_empty(&tsk->signal->ignored_posix_timers)))
+ return;
+
+ hlist_move_list(&tsk->signal->ignored_posix_timers, &timers);
+ while (!hlist_empty(&timers))
+ posix_timer_cleanup_ignored(hlist_entry(timers.first, struct k_itimer, list));
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(clock_settime, const clockid_t, which_clock,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 15/20] posix-timers: Handle ignored list on delete and exit
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 15/20] posix-timers: Handle ignored list on delete and exit Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-01 13:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-01 20:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2024-11-01 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> To handle posix timer signals on sigaction(SIG_IGN) properly, the timers
> will be queued on a separate ignored list.
>
> Add the necessary cleanup code for timer_delete() and exit_itimers().
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> V6: Warn when the ignored list is not empty after deleting all timers in
> exit_itimers()
> ---
> include/linux/posix-timers.h | 4 +++-
> kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> ---
>
> --- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> +++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> @@ -152,7 +152,8 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_init_
>
> /**
> * struct k_itimer - POSIX.1b interval timer structure.
> - * @list: List head for binding the timer to signals->posix_timers
> + * @list: List node for binding the timer to tsk::signal::posix_timers
> + * @ignored_list: List node for tracking ignored timers in tsk::signal::ignored_posix_timers
> * @t_hash: Entry in the posix timer hash table
> * @it_lock: Lock protecting the timer
> * @kclock: Pointer to the k_clock struct handling this timer
> @@ -176,6 +177,7 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_init_
> */
> struct k_itimer {
> struct hlist_node list;
> + struct hlist_node ignored_list;
> struct hlist_node t_hash;
> spinlock_t it_lock;
> const struct k_clock *kclock;
> --- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> @@ -1027,6 +1027,18 @@ int common_timer_del(struct k_itimer *ti
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * If the deleted timer is on the ignored list, remove it and
> + * drop the associated reference.
> + */
> +static inline void posix_timer_cleanup_ignored(struct k_itimer *tmr)
> +{
> + if (!hlist_unhashed(&tmr->ignored_list)) {
> + hlist_del_init(&tmr->ignored_list);
> + posixtimer_putref(tmr);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static inline int timer_delete_hook(struct k_itimer *timer)
> {
> const struct k_clock *kc = timer->kclock;
> @@ -1059,6 +1071,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(timer_delete, timer_t, t
>
> spin_lock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> hlist_del(&timer->list);
> + posix_timer_cleanup_ignored(timer);
> spin_unlock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> /*
> * A concurrent lookup could check timer::it_signal lockless. It
> @@ -1110,6 +1123,8 @@ static void itimer_delete(struct k_itime
> }
> hlist_del(&timer->list);
>
> + posix_timer_cleanup_ignored(timer);
> +
> /*
> * Setting timer::it_signal to NULL is technically not required
> * here as nothing can access the timer anymore legitimately via
> @@ -1142,6 +1157,17 @@ void exit_itimers(struct task_struct *ts
> /* The timers are not longer accessible via tsk::signal */
> while (!hlist_empty(&timers))
> itimer_delete(hlist_entry(timers.first, struct k_itimer, list));
> +
> + /*
> + * There should be no timers on the ignored list. itimer_delete() has
> + * mopped them up.
> + */
> + if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!hlist_empty(&tsk->signal->ignored_posix_timers)))
> + return;
> +
> + hlist_move_list(&tsk->signal->ignored_posix_timers, &timers);
> + while (!hlist_empty(&timers))
> + posix_timer_cleanup_ignored(hlist_entry(timers.first, struct k_itimer, list));
s/list/ignored_list ?
Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> }
>
> SYSCALL_DEFINE2(clock_settime, const clockid_t, which_clock,
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 15/20] posix-timers: Handle ignored list on delete and exit
2024-11-01 13:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2024-11-01 20:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-11-01 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 14:47, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
>> + hlist_move_list(&tsk->signal->ignored_posix_timers, &timers);
>> + while (!hlist_empty(&timers))
>> + posix_timer_cleanup_ignored(hlist_entry(timers.first, struct k_itimer, list));
>
> s/list/ignored_list ?
Ooops. This code path was obviously never reached so that went
unnoticed. Thanks for spotting it!
> Other than that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
>
>
>> }
>>
>> SYSCALL_DEFINE2(clock_settime, const clockid_t, which_clock,
>>
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* [patch v6 16/20] signal: Handle ignored signals in do_sigaction(action != SIG_IGN)
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 15/20] posix-timers: Handle ignored list on delete and exit Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list Thomas Gleixner
` (3 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
When a real handler (including SIG_DFL) is installed for a signal, which
had previously SIG_IGN set, then the list of ignored posix timers has to be
checked for timers which are affected by this change.
Add a list walk function which checks for the matching signal number and if
found requeues the timers signal, so the timer is rearmed on signal
delivery.
Rearming the timer right away is not possible because that requires to drop
sighand lock.
No functional change as the counter part which queues the timers on the
ignored list is still missing.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/signal.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -2030,7 +2030,54 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
unlock_task_sighand(t, &flags);
return ret;
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS */
+
+static void posixtimer_sig_unignore(struct task_struct *tsk, int sig)
+{
+ struct hlist_head *head = &tsk->signal->ignored_posix_timers;
+ struct hlist_node *tmp;
+ struct k_itimer *tmr;
+
+ if (likely(hlist_empty(head)))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Rearming a timer with sighand lock held is not possible due to
+ * lock ordering vs. tmr::it_lock. Just stick the sigqueue back and
+ * let the signal delivery path deal with it whether it needs to be
+ * rearmed or not. This cannot be decided here w/o dropping sighand
+ * lock and creating a loop retry horror show.
+ */
+ hlist_for_each_entry_safe(tmr, tmp , head, ignored_list) {
+ struct task_struct *target;
+
+ /*
+ * tmr::sigq.info.si_signo is immutable, so accessing it
+ * without holding tmr::it_lock is safe.
+ */
+ if (tmr->sigq.info.si_signo != sig)
+ continue;
+
+ hlist_del_init(&tmr->ignored_list);
+
+ /* This should never happen and leaks a reference count */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&tmr->sigq.list)))
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * Get the target for the signal. If target is a thread and
+ * has exited by now, drop the reference count.
+ */
+ guard(rcu)();
+ target = posixtimer_get_target(tmr);
+ if (target)
+ posixtimer_queue_sigqueue(&tmr->sigq, target, tmr->it_pid_type);
+ else
+ posixtimer_putref(tmr);
+ }
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS */
+static inline void posixtimer_sig_unignore(struct task_struct *tsk, int sig) { }
+#endif /* !CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS */
void do_notify_pidfd(struct task_struct *task)
{
@@ -4208,6 +4255,8 @@ int do_sigaction(int sig, struct k_sigac
sigaction_compat_abi(act, oact);
if (act) {
+ bool was_ignored = k->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN;
+
sigdelsetmask(&act->sa.sa_mask,
sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGSTOP));
*k = *act;
@@ -4228,6 +4277,8 @@ int do_sigaction(int sig, struct k_sigac
flush_sigqueue_mask(p, &mask, &p->signal->shared_pending);
for_each_thread(p, t)
flush_sigqueue_mask(p, &mask, &t->pending);
+ } else if (was_ignored) {
+ posixtimer_sig_unignore(p, sig);
}
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 16/20] signal: Handle ignored signals in do_sigaction(action != SIG_IGN)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 16/20] signal: Handle ignored signals in do_sigaction(action != SIG_IGN) Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-01 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2024-11-01 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:42PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> When a real handler (including SIG_DFL) is installed for a signal, which
> had previously SIG_IGN set, then the list of ignored posix timers has to be
> checked for timers which are affected by this change.
>
> Add a list walk function which checks for the matching signal number and if
> found requeues the timers signal, so the timer is rearmed on signal
> delivery.
>
> Rearming the timer right away is not possible because that requires to drop
> sighand lock.
>
> No functional change as the counter part which queues the timers on the
> ignored list is still missing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 16/20] signal: Handle ignored signals in do_sigaction(action != SIG_IGN) Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 14:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-02 21:05 ` [patch v6.1 " Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 18/20] posix-timers: Cleanup SIG_IGN workaround leftovers Thomas Gleixner
` (2 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 2 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Queue posixtimers which have their signal ignored on the ignored list:
1) When the timer fires and the signal has SIG_IGN set
2) When SIG_IGN is installed via sigaction() and a timer signal
is already queued
This completes the SIG_IGN handling and such timers are not longer self
rearmed which avoids pointless wakeups.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/signal.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -731,6 +731,16 @@ void signal_wake_up_state(struct task_st
kick_process(t);
}
+static inline void posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q);
+
+static void sigqueue_free_ignored(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
+{
+ if (likely(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) || q->info.si_code != SI_TIMER))
+ __sigqueue_free(q);
+ else
+ posixtimer_sig_ignore(tsk, q);
+}
+
/* Remove signals in mask from the pending set and queue. */
static void flush_sigqueue_mask(struct task_struct *p, sigset_t *mask, struct sigpending *s)
{
@@ -747,7 +757,7 @@ static void flush_sigqueue_mask(struct t
list_for_each_entry_safe(q, n, &s->list, list) {
if (sigismember(mask, q->info.si_signo)) {
list_del_init(&q->list);
- __sigqueue_free(q);
+ sigqueue_free_ignored(p, q);
}
}
}
@@ -1964,7 +1974,7 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
int sig = q->info.si_signo;
struct task_struct *t;
unsigned long flags;
- int ret, result;
+ int result;
guard(rcu)();
@@ -1981,13 +1991,24 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
*/
tmr->it_sigqueue_seq = tmr->it_signal_seq;
- ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, false)) {
result = TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED;
+
+ /* Paranoia check. Try to survive. */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&q->list)))
+ goto out;
+
+ if (hlist_unhashed(&tmr->ignored_list)) {
+ hlist_add_head(&tmr->ignored_list, &t->signal->ignored_posix_timers);
+ posixtimer_sigqueue_getref(q);
+ }
goto out;
}
- ret = 0;
+ /* This should never happen and leaks a reference count */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!hlist_unhashed(&tmr->ignored_list)))
+ hlist_del_init(&tmr->ignored_list);
+
if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
/* This holds a reference count already */
result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
@@ -2000,7 +2021,14 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
out:
trace_signal_generate(sig, &q->info, t, tmr->it_pid_type != PIDTYPE_PID, result);
unlock_task_sighand(t, &flags);
- return ret;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
+{
+ struct k_itimer *tmr = container_of(q, struct k_itimer, sigq);
+
+ hlist_add_head(&tmr->ignored_list, &tsk->signal->ignored_posix_timers);
}
static void posixtimer_sig_unignore(struct task_struct *tsk, int sig)
@@ -2048,6 +2076,7 @@ static void posixtimer_sig_unignore(stru
}
}
#else /* CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS */
+static inline void posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q) { }
static inline void posixtimer_sig_unignore(struct task_struct *tsk, int sig) { }
#endif /* !CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-01 14:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-01 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 21:05 ` [patch v6.1 " Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2024-11-01 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> Queue posixtimers which have their signal ignored on the ignored list:
>
> 1) When the timer fires and the signal has SIG_IGN set
>
> 2) When SIG_IGN is installed via sigaction() and a timer signal
> is already queued
>
> This completes the SIG_IGN handling and such timers are not longer self
> rearmed which avoids pointless wakeups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> kernel/signal.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> ---
>
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -731,6 +731,16 @@ void signal_wake_up_state(struct task_st
> kick_process(t);
> }
>
> +static inline void posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q);
> +
> +static void sigqueue_free_ignored(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
> +{
> + if (likely(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) || q->info.si_code != SI_TIMER))
> + __sigqueue_free(q);
> + else
> + posixtimer_sig_ignore(tsk, q);
So this happens when the signal is ignored and delays it to when it will be
unignored. But the comment on do_sigaction() says:
/*
* POSIX 3.3.1.3:
* "Setting a signal action to SIG_IGN for a signal that is
* pending shall cause the pending signal to be discarded,
* whether or not it is blocked."
*
*/
Are posix timers an exception to that rule?
Also I see flush_sigqueue_mask() called on other occasions, for example
when a STOP signal happens to remove pending CONT, not sure if posix
timers can set SIGCONT...
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-11-01 14:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2024-11-01 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 14:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 23:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 2 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-11-01 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 15:21, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
>> +static void sigqueue_free_ignored(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
>> +{
>> + if (likely(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) || q->info.si_code != SI_TIMER))
>> + __sigqueue_free(q);
>> + else
>> + posixtimer_sig_ignore(tsk, q);
>
> So this happens when the signal is ignored and delays it to when it will be
> unignored. But the comment on do_sigaction() says:
>
> /*
> * POSIX 3.3.1.3:
> * "Setting a signal action to SIG_IGN for a signal that is
> * pending shall cause the pending signal to be discarded,
> * whether or not it is blocked."
> *
> */
>
> Are posix timers an exception to that rule?
>
> Also I see flush_sigqueue_mask() called on other occasions, for example
> when a STOP signal happens to remove pending CONT, not sure if posix
> timers can set SIGCONT...
No. The problem with posix timers is that they are magically different
from regular signals in the case of periodic timers.
When the signal is ignored at expiry, then the signal is not delivered
and is 'dropped'. But when SIG_IGN is removed then the following period
expiry has to deliver the signal.
Right now the kernel ensures that by keeping the timer self rearming and
rate limiting it for obvious reasons. That's a completely pointless
exercise up to the point where SIG_IGN is removed.
The only way to avoid the self rearming is to actually stop the timer
when the signal is ignored and rearm it when SIG_IGN for the specific
signal is removed.
That's what this magic does...
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-11-01 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-02 14:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 20:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 23:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
1 sibling, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-11-02 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 21:47, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 15:21, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
>>> +static void sigqueue_free_ignored(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
>>> +{
>>> + if (likely(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) || q->info.si_code != SI_TIMER))
>>> + __sigqueue_free(q);
>>> + else
>>> + posixtimer_sig_ignore(tsk, q);
>>
>> So this happens when the signal is ignored and delays it to when it will be
>> unignored. But the comment on do_sigaction() says:
>>
>> /*
>> * POSIX 3.3.1.3:
>> * "Setting a signal action to SIG_IGN for a signal that is
>> * pending shall cause the pending signal to be discarded,
>> * whether or not it is blocked."
>> *
>> */
>>
>> Are posix timers an exception to that rule?
>>
>> Also I see flush_sigqueue_mask() called on other occasions, for example
>> when a STOP signal happens to remove pending CONT, not sure if posix
>> timers can set SIGCONT...
>
> No. The problem with posix timers is that they are magically different
> from regular signals in the case of periodic timers.
>
> When the signal is ignored at expiry, then the signal is not delivered
> and is 'dropped'. But when SIG_IGN is removed then the following period
> expiry has to deliver the signal.
>
> Right now the kernel ensures that by keeping the timer self rearming and
> rate limiting it for obvious reasons. That's a completely pointless
> exercise up to the point where SIG_IGN is removed.
>
> The only way to avoid the self rearming is to actually stop the timer
> when the signal is ignored and rearm it when SIG_IGN for the specific
> signal is removed.
>
> That's what this magic does...
But it does not exclude oneshot timers from this. Their signal has to be
dropped for real.
Delta patch below.
Thanks,
tglx
---
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ void signal_wake_up_state(struct task_st
kick_process(t);
}
-static inline void posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q);
+static inline bool posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q);
static void sigqueue_free_ignored(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
{
@@ -1999,8 +1999,8 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
goto out;
if (hlist_unhashed(&tmr->ignored_list)) {
- hlist_add_head(&tmr->ignored_list, &t->signal->ignored_posix_timers);
- posixtimer_sigqueue_getref(q);
+ if (posixtimer_sig_ignore(t, tmr))
+ posixtimer_sigqueue_getref(q);
}
goto out;
}
@@ -2024,11 +2024,15 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
return 0;
}
-static inline void posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
+static inline bool posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
{
struct k_itimer *tmr = container_of(q, struct k_itimer, sigq);
+ /* Only queue periodic timer signals */
+ if (tmr->status != POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING)
+ return false;
hlist_add_head(&tmr->ignored_list, &tsk->signal->ignored_posix_timers);
+ return true;
}
static void posixtimer_sig_unignore(struct task_struct *tsk, int sig)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-11-02 14:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-02 20:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-11-02 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
On Sat, Nov 02 2024 at 15:49, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> That's what this magic does...
>
> But it does not exclude oneshot timers from this. Their signal has to be
> dropped for real.
>
> Delta patch below.
Which is incomplete. I send a full replacement in a subsequent mail.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-11-01 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 14:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-02 23:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-03 9:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2024-11-02 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
Le Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 09:47:15PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 15:21, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> >> +static void sigqueue_free_ignored(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
> >> +{
> >> + if (likely(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) || q->info.si_code != SI_TIMER))
> >> + __sigqueue_free(q);
> >> + else
> >> + posixtimer_sig_ignore(tsk, q);
> >
> > So this happens when the signal is ignored and delays it to when it will be
> > unignored. But the comment on do_sigaction() says:
> >
> > /*
> > * POSIX 3.3.1.3:
> > * "Setting a signal action to SIG_IGN for a signal that is
> > * pending shall cause the pending signal to be discarded,
> > * whether or not it is blocked."
> > *
> > */
> >
> > Are posix timers an exception to that rule?
> >
> > Also I see flush_sigqueue_mask() called on other occasions, for example
> > when a STOP signal happens to remove pending CONT, not sure if posix
> > timers can set SIGCONT...
>
> No. The problem with posix timers is that they are magically different
> from regular signals in the case of periodic timers.
>
> When the signal is ignored at expiry, then the signal is not delivered
> and is 'dropped'. But when SIG_IGN is removed then the following period
> expiry has to deliver the signal.
>
> Right now the kernel ensures that by keeping the timer self rearming and
> rate limiting it for obvious reasons. That's a completely pointless
> exercise up to the point where SIG_IGN is removed.
>
> The only way to avoid the self rearming is to actually stop the timer
> when the signal is ignored and rearm it when SIG_IGN for the specific
> signal is removed.
>
> That's what this magic does...
Agreed and that covers the case when the signal is queued while the handler
is SIG_IGN. But I didn't know about the case where the signal is queued and
then the handler is set to SIG_IGN before it get a chance to be delivered.
Which of course is not fundamentally different now that I think about it
twice.
And what about the other callers of flush_sigqueue_mask()? Such as SIGCONT
removed when SIGSTOP arrives? And the reverse as well? This moves the pending
timers signals to the ignore list until the signal is unignored, but in that
case SIGCONT is not ignored? Or perhaps SIGCONT and SIGSTOP can't be set for
posix timers?
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-11-02 23:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2024-11-03 9:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-03 19:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-11-03 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
On Sun, Nov 03 2024 at 00:46, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> And what about the other callers of flush_sigqueue_mask()? Such as SIGCONT
> removed when SIGSTOP arrives? And the reverse as well? This moves the pending
> timers signals to the ignore list until the signal is unignored, but in that
> case SIGCONT is not ignored? Or perhaps SIGCONT and SIGSTOP can't be set for
> posix timers?
You can set SIGSTOP/CONT on a posix timer. Whether that makes sense or
not is a different question :)
Even on current mainline the behaviour is pretty much unspecified. Some
combinations "work", some not. I just tried out of morbid curiousity. :)
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-11-03 9:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-03 19:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2024-11-03 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
Le Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 10:44:35AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 03 2024 at 00:46, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > And what about the other callers of flush_sigqueue_mask()? Such as SIGCONT
> > removed when SIGSTOP arrives? And the reverse as well? This moves the pending
> > timers signals to the ignore list until the signal is unignored, but in that
> > case SIGCONT is not ignored? Or perhaps SIGCONT and SIGSTOP can't be set for
> > posix timers?
>
> You can set SIGSTOP/CONT on a posix timer. Whether that makes sense or
> not is a different question :)
>
> Even on current mainline the behaviour is pretty much unspecified. Some
> combinations "work", some not. I just tried out of morbid curiousity. :)
I see.
So probably we shouldn't care too much, right?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* [patch v6.1 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 14:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2024-11-02 21:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-04 11:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
1 sibling, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-11-02 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
Queue posixtimers which have their signal ignored on the ignored list:
1) When the timer fires and the signal has SIG_IGN set
2) When SIG_IGN is installed via sigaction() and a timer signal
is already queued
This completes the SIG_IGN handling and such timers are not longer self
rearmed which avoids pointless wakeups.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
V6.1: Handle oneshot timer expiry or transitioning from periodic to
oneshot after a rearming correctly. - Frederic
---
kernel/signal.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -731,6 +731,16 @@ void signal_wake_up_state(struct task_st
kick_process(t);
}
+static inline void posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q);
+
+static void sigqueue_free_ignored(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
+{
+ if (likely(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) || q->info.si_code != SI_TIMER))
+ __sigqueue_free(q);
+ else
+ posixtimer_sig_ignore(tsk, q);
+}
+
/* Remove signals in mask from the pending set and queue. */
static void flush_sigqueue_mask(struct task_struct *p, sigset_t *mask, struct sigpending *s)
{
@@ -747,7 +757,7 @@ static void flush_sigqueue_mask(struct t
list_for_each_entry_safe(q, n, &s->list, list) {
if (sigismember(mask, q->info.si_signo)) {
list_del_init(&q->list);
- __sigqueue_free(q);
+ sigqueue_free_ignored(p, q);
}
}
}
@@ -1964,7 +1974,7 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
int sig = q->info.si_signo;
struct task_struct *t;
unsigned long flags;
- int ret, result;
+ int result;
guard(rcu)();
@@ -1981,13 +1991,48 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
*/
tmr->it_sigqueue_seq = tmr->it_signal_seq;
- ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, false)) {
result = TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED;
+
+ /* Paranoia check. Try to survive. */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&q->list)))
+ goto out;
+
+ /* Periodic timers with SIG_IGN are queued on the ignored list */
+ if (tmr->it_status == POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING) {
+ /*
+ * Already queued means the timer was rearmed after
+ * the previous expiry got it on the ignore list.
+ * Nothing to do for that case.
+ */
+ if (hlist_unhashed(&tmr->ignored_list)) {
+ /*
+ * Take a signal reference and queue it on
+ * the ignored list.
+ */
+ posixtimer_sigqueue_getref(q);
+ posixtimer_sig_ignore(t, tmr);
+ }
+ } else if (!hlist_unhashed(&tmr->ignored_list)) {
+ /*
+ * Covers the case where a timer was periodic and
+ * then signal was ignored. Then it was rearmed as
+ * oneshot timer. The previous signal is invalid
+ * now, and the oneshot signal has to be dropped.
+ * Remove it from the ignored list and drop the
+ * reference count as the signal is not longer
+ * queued.
+ */
+ hlist_del_init(&tmr->ignored_list);
+ posixtimer_putref(tmr);
+ }
goto out;
}
- ret = 0;
+ /* This should never happen and leaks a reference count */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!hlist_unhashed(&tmr->ignored_list)))
+ hlist_del_init(&tmr->ignored_list);
+
if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
/* This holds a reference count already */
result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
@@ -2000,7 +2045,21 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
out:
trace_signal_generate(sig, &q->info, t, tmr->it_pid_type != PIDTYPE_PID, result);
unlock_task_sighand(t, &flags);
- return ret;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
+{
+ struct k_itimer *tmr = container_of(q, struct k_itimer, sigq);
+
+ /*
+ * Only enqueue periodic timer signals to the ignored list. For
+ * oneshot timers, drop the reference count.
+ */
+ if (tmr->it_status == POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING)
+ hlist_add_head(&tmr->ignored_list, &tsk->signal->ignored_posix_timers);
+ else
+ posixtimer_putref(tmr);
}
static void posixtimer_sig_unignore(struct task_struct *tsk, int sig)
@@ -2048,6 +2107,7 @@ static void posixtimer_sig_unignore(stru
}
}
#else /* CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS */
+static inline void posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q) { }
static inline void posixtimer_sig_unignore(struct task_struct *tsk, int sig) { }
#endif /* !CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6.1 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-11-02 21:05 ` [patch v6.1 " Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-04 11:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-04 15:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2024-11-04 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
Le Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 10:05:08PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> Queue posixtimers which have their signal ignored on the ignored list:
>
> 1) When the timer fires and the signal has SIG_IGN set
>
> 2) When SIG_IGN is installed via sigaction() and a timer signal
> is already queued
>
> This completes the SIG_IGN handling and such timers are not longer self
> rearmed which avoids pointless wakeups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> V6.1: Handle oneshot timer expiry or transitioning from periodic to
> oneshot after a rearming correctly. - Frederic
> ---
> kernel/signal.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> ---
>
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -731,6 +731,16 @@ void signal_wake_up_state(struct task_st
> kick_process(t);
> }
>
> +static inline void posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q);
> +
> +static void sigqueue_free_ignored(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
> +{
> + if (likely(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) || q->info.si_code != SI_TIMER))
> + __sigqueue_free(q);
> + else
> + posixtimer_sig_ignore(tsk, q);
> +}
> +
> /* Remove signals in mask from the pending set and queue. */
> static void flush_sigqueue_mask(struct task_struct *p, sigset_t *mask, struct sigpending *s)
> {
> @@ -747,7 +757,7 @@ static void flush_sigqueue_mask(struct t
> list_for_each_entry_safe(q, n, &s->list, list) {
> if (sigismember(mask, q->info.si_signo)) {
> list_del_init(&q->list);
> - __sigqueue_free(q);
> + sigqueue_free_ignored(p, q);
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -1964,7 +1974,7 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
> int sig = q->info.si_signo;
> struct task_struct *t;
> unsigned long flags;
> - int ret, result;
> + int result;
>
> guard(rcu)();
>
> @@ -1981,13 +1991,48 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
> */
> tmr->it_sigqueue_seq = tmr->it_signal_seq;
>
> - ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
> if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, false)) {
> result = TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED;
> +
> + /* Paranoia check. Try to survive. */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&q->list)))
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* Periodic timers with SIG_IGN are queued on the ignored list */
> + if (tmr->it_status == POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING) {
> + /*
> + * Already queued means the timer was rearmed after
> + * the previous expiry got it on the ignore list.
> + * Nothing to do for that case.
> + */
> + if (hlist_unhashed(&tmr->ignored_list)) {
> + /*
> + * Take a signal reference and queue it on
> + * the ignored list.
> + */
> + posixtimer_sigqueue_getref(q);
> + posixtimer_sig_ignore(t, tmr);
> + }
> + } else if (!hlist_unhashed(&tmr->ignored_list)) {
> + /*
> + * Covers the case where a timer was periodic and
> + * then signal was ignored. Then it was rearmed as
> + * oneshot timer. The previous signal is invalid
> + * now, and the oneshot signal has to be dropped.
> + * Remove it from the ignored list and drop the
> + * reference count as the signal is not longer
> + * queued.
> + */
> + hlist_del_init(&tmr->ignored_list);
> + posixtimer_putref(tmr);
> + }
> goto out;
> }
>
> - ret = 0;
> + /* This should never happen and leaks a reference count */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!hlist_unhashed(&tmr->ignored_list)))
> + hlist_del_init(&tmr->ignored_list);
> +
> if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
> /* This holds a reference count already */
> result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
> @@ -2000,7 +2045,21 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
> out:
> trace_signal_generate(sig, &q->info, t, tmr->it_pid_type != PIDTYPE_PID, result);
> unlock_task_sighand(t, &flags);
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
> +{
> + struct k_itimer *tmr = container_of(q, struct k_itimer, sigq);
> +
> + /*
> + * Only enqueue periodic timer signals to the ignored list. For
> + * oneshot timers, drop the reference count.
> + */
> + if (tmr->it_status == POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING)
This is read locklessly against timer lock. So it only makes sure that
the last write to POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING will be visible due to the
sighand locking. However it may or may not see the other states written after.
Which looks ok because if the timer is concurrently armed / disarmed / or even
requeue pending again, then either the signal is dropped and it's fine or the
signal is moved to the ignored list and the seq will take care of the validity
upon delivery.
Still this may need a WRITE_ONCE() / READ_ONCE().
But there is something more problematic against the delete() path:
Thread within Signal target Timer target
signal target group
-------------------- ------------- -------------
timr->it_status = POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING
posixtimer_send_sigqueue();
do_exit();
timer_delete()
posix_cpu_timer_del()
// return NULL
cpu_timer_task_rcu()
// timer->it_status NOT set
// to POSIX_TIMER_DISARMED
hlist_del(&timer->list);
posix_timer_cleanup_ignored()
do_sigaction(SIG_IGN...)
flush_sigqueue_mask()
sigqueue_free_ignored()
posixtimer_sig_ignore()
// Observe POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING
hlist_add_head(...ignored_posix_timers)
do_exit()
exit_itimers()
if (hlist_empty(&tsk->signal->posix_timers))
return;
// leaked timer queued to migrate list
> + hlist_add_head(&tmr->ignored_list, &tsk->signal->ignored_posix_timers);
> + else
> + posixtimer_putref(tmr);
> }
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6.1 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-11-04 11:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2024-11-04 15:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-04 21:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-11-04 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
On Mon, Nov 04 2024 at 12:42, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> But there is something more problematic against the delete() path:
>
> Thread within Signal target Timer target
> signal target group
> -------------------- ------------- -------------
> timr->it_status = POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING
> posixtimer_send_sigqueue();
> do_exit();
> timer_delete()
> posix_cpu_timer_del()
> // return NULL
> cpu_timer_task_rcu()
> // timer->it_status NOT set
> // to POSIX_TIMER_DISARMED
> hlist_del(&timer->list);
> posix_timer_cleanup_ignored()
>
>
> do_sigaction(SIG_IGN...)
> flush_sigqueue_mask()
> sigqueue_free_ignored()
> posixtimer_sig_ignore()
> // Observe POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING
> hlist_add_head(...ignored_posix_timers)
> do_exit()
> exit_itimers()
> if (hlist_empty(&tsk->signal->posix_timers))
> return;
> // leaked timer queued to migrate list
>
Duh. Let me stare at that some more.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch v6.1 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-11-04 15:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-04 21:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-04 23:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-11-04 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
On Mon, Nov 04 2024 at 16:21, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04 2024 at 12:42, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> But there is something more problematic against the delete() path:
>>
>> Thread within Signal target Timer target
>> signal target group
>> -------------------- ------------- -------------
>> timr->it_status = POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING
>> posixtimer_send_sigqueue();
>> do_exit();
>> timer_delete()
>> posix_cpu_timer_del()
>> // return NULL
>> cpu_timer_task_rcu()
>> // timer->it_status NOT set
>> // to POSIX_TIMER_DISARMED
>> hlist_del(&timer->list);
>> posix_timer_cleanup_ignored()
>>
>>
>> do_sigaction(SIG_IGN...)
>> flush_sigqueue_mask()
>> sigqueue_free_ignored()
>> posixtimer_sig_ignore()
>> // Observe POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING
>> hlist_add_head(...ignored_posix_timers)
>> do_exit()
>> exit_itimers()
>> if (hlist_empty(&tsk->signal->posix_timers))
>> return;
>> // leaked timer queued to migrate list
>>
>
> Duh. Let me stare at that some more.
The delete() issue is actually easy to address:
posixtimer_sig_ignore() must check timer->it_signal, which is set to
NULL in timer_delete(). This write must move into the sighand lock
held section, where posix_timer_cleanup_ignored() is invoked.
If NULL, posixtimer_sig_ignore() drops the reference.
If do_sigaction() locked sighand first and moved it to the ignored
list, then posix_timer_cleanup_ignored() will remove it again.
The status part is hard to get right without sighand lock being held,
but it is required to ensure that a pending one-shot timer signal is
dropped in do_sigaction(SIG_IGN).
There is an easy fix for that too:
posixtimer_send_siqqueue() does the following under sighand lock:
timer->it_sig_periodic = timer->it_status == POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING;
posixtimer_sig_ignore() checks that flag. If not set it can drop the
reference independent of the actual status of the timer. If the timer
was rearmed as periodic, then it did not expire yet because the expiry
would have set the flag. If it expires concurrently the expiry
function is stuck on sighand::siglock.
If the flag is set then the signal will go onto the ignored list and
un-ignore will move it back to the pending list. That's not a problem
in the case that the timer was re/dis-armed before or after moving, as
this is all covered by the sequence check.
All of that works because in both cases the protection scheme on the
timer side is that both timer::lock and sighand::siglock have to be held
for modifying
timer::it_sigqueue_seq
timer::it_signal
timer::it_sig_periodic
which means that on the signal side holding sighand::siglock is enough.
In posixtimer_deliver_signal() holding the timer lock is sufficient to
do the sequence validation against timer::it_sig_periodic.
I'll fixup the inconsistent state thing in posix-cpu-timers too and send
out a v7 soon.
Thanks a lot for studying this in detail!
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: [patch v6.1 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
2024-11-04 21:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-11-04 23:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2024-11-04 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Anna-Maria Behnsen, John Stultz, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman, Oleg Nesterov
Le Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:31:57PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 04 2024 at 16:21, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 04 2024 at 12:42, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >> But there is something more problematic against the delete() path:
> >>
> >> Thread within Signal target Timer target
> >> signal target group
> >> -------------------- ------------- -------------
> >> timr->it_status = POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING
> >> posixtimer_send_sigqueue();
> >> do_exit();
> >> timer_delete()
> >> posix_cpu_timer_del()
> >> // return NULL
> >> cpu_timer_task_rcu()
> >> // timer->it_status NOT set
> >> // to POSIX_TIMER_DISARMED
> >> hlist_del(&timer->list);
> >> posix_timer_cleanup_ignored()
> >>
> >>
> >> do_sigaction(SIG_IGN...)
> >> flush_sigqueue_mask()
> >> sigqueue_free_ignored()
> >> posixtimer_sig_ignore()
> >> // Observe POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING
> >> hlist_add_head(...ignored_posix_timers)
> >> do_exit()
> >> exit_itimers()
> >> if (hlist_empty(&tsk->signal->posix_timers))
> >> return;
> >> // leaked timer queued to migrate list
> >>
> >
> > Duh. Let me stare at that some more.
>
> The delete() issue is actually easy to address:
>
> posixtimer_sig_ignore() must check timer->it_signal, which is set to
> NULL in timer_delete(). This write must move into the sighand lock
> held section, where posix_timer_cleanup_ignored() is invoked.
>
> If NULL, posixtimer_sig_ignore() drops the reference.
>
> If do_sigaction() locked sighand first and moved it to the ignored
> list, then posix_timer_cleanup_ignored() will remove it again.
Indeed. Unconditionally writing ->it_status to DISARMED in posix_cpu_timer_del()
would also do the trick as that write would be released by the sighand unlock after
posix_timer_cleanup_ignored(). But testing ->it_signal after guaranteeing it is
written inside sighand looks like a more straightforward way to go.
(Still it makes sense to unconditionally set ->it_status to DISARMED after delete()).
>
>
> The status part is hard to get right without sighand lock being held,
> but it is required to ensure that a pending one-shot timer signal is
> dropped in do_sigaction(SIG_IGN).
>
> There is an easy fix for that too:
>
> posixtimer_send_siqqueue() does the following under sighand lock:
>
> timer->it_sig_periodic = timer->it_status == POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING;
>
> posixtimer_sig_ignore() checks that flag. If not set it can drop the
> reference independent of the actual status of the timer. If the timer
> was rearmed as periodic, then it did not expire yet because the expiry
> would have set the flag. If it expires concurrently the expiry
> function is stuck on sighand::siglock.
>
> If the flag is set then the signal will go onto the ignored list and
> un-ignore will move it back to the pending list. That's not a problem
> in the case that the timer was re/dis-armed before or after moving, as
> this is all covered by the sequence check.
>
> All of that works because in both cases the protection scheme on the
> timer side is that both timer::lock and sighand::siglock have to be held
> for modifying
>
> timer::it_sigqueue_seq
> timer::it_signal
> timer::it_sig_periodic
>
> which means that on the signal side holding sighand::siglock is enough.
>
> In posixtimer_deliver_signal() holding the timer lock is sufficient to
> do the sequence validation against timer::it_sig_periodic.
Exactly.
>
> I'll fixup the inconsistent state thing in posix-cpu-timers too and send
> out a v7 soon.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* [patch v6 18/20] posix-timers: Cleanup SIG_IGN workaround leftovers
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 19/20] alarmtimers: Remove the throttle mechanism from alarm_forward_now() Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 20/20] alarmtimers: Remove return value from alarm functions Thomas Gleixner
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Now that ignored posix timer signals are requeued and the timers are
rearmed on signal delivery the workaround to keep such timers alive and
self rearm them is not longer required.
Remove the relevant hacks and the not longer required return values from
the related functions. The alarm timer workarounds will be cleaned up in a
separate step.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/posix-timers.h | 2 -
kernel/signal.c | 7 +--
kernel/time/alarmtimer.c | 47 +++++---------------------
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 18 ++--------
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 73 +++--------------------------------------
kernel/time/posix-timers.h | 2 -
6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
---
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_rt_wa
void posixtimer_rearm_itimer(struct task_struct *p);
bool posixtimer_init_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q);
-int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_itimer *tmr);
+void posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_itimer *tmr);
bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info, struct sigqueue *timer_sigq);
void posixtimer_free_timer(struct k_itimer *timer);
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1968,7 +1968,7 @@ static inline struct task_struct *posixt
return t;
}
-int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_itimer *tmr)
+void posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_itimer *tmr)
{
struct sigqueue *q = &tmr->sigq;
int sig = q->info.si_signo;
@@ -1980,10 +1980,10 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
t = posixtimer_get_target(tmr);
if (!t)
- return -1;
+ return;
if (!likely(lock_task_sighand(t, &flags)))
- return -1;
+ return;
/*
* Update @tmr::sigqueue_seq for posix timer signals with sighand
@@ -2021,7 +2021,6 @@ int posixtimer_send_sigqueue(struct k_it
out:
trace_signal_generate(sig, &q->info, t, tmr->it_pid_type != PIDTYPE_PID, result);
unlock_task_sighand(t, &flags);
- return 0;
}
static inline void posixtimer_sig_ignore(struct task_struct *tsk, struct sigqueue *q)
--- a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
@@ -197,28 +197,15 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart alarmtimer_f
{
struct alarm *alarm = container_of(timer, struct alarm, timer);
struct alarm_base *base = &alarm_bases[alarm->type];
- unsigned long flags;
- int ret = HRTIMER_NORESTART;
- int restart = ALARMTIMER_NORESTART;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock, flags);
- alarmtimer_dequeue(base, alarm);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock, flags);
+ scoped_guard (spinlock_irqsave, &base->lock)
+ alarmtimer_dequeue(base, alarm);
if (alarm->function)
- restart = alarm->function(alarm, base->get_ktime());
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock, flags);
- if (restart != ALARMTIMER_NORESTART) {
- hrtimer_set_expires(&alarm->timer, alarm->node.expires);
- alarmtimer_enqueue(base, alarm);
- ret = HRTIMER_RESTART;
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock, flags);
+ alarm->function(alarm, base->get_ktime());
trace_alarmtimer_fired(alarm, base->get_ktime());
- return ret;
-
+ return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
}
ktime_t alarm_expires_remaining(const struct alarm *alarm)
@@ -567,30 +554,14 @@ static enum alarmtimer_type clock2alarm(
*
* Return: whether the timer is to be restarted
*/
-static enum alarmtimer_restart alarm_handle_timer(struct alarm *alarm,
- ktime_t now)
+static enum alarmtimer_restart alarm_handle_timer(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t now)
{
- struct k_itimer *ptr = container_of(alarm, struct k_itimer,
- it.alarm.alarmtimer);
- enum alarmtimer_restart result = ALARMTIMER_NORESTART;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ptr->it_lock, flags);
+ struct k_itimer *ptr = container_of(alarm, struct k_itimer, it.alarm.alarmtimer);
- if (posix_timer_queue_signal(ptr) && ptr->it_interval) {
- /*
- * Handle ignored signals and rearm the timer. This will go
- * away once we handle ignored signals proper. Ensure that
- * small intervals cannot starve the system.
- */
- ptr->it_overrun += __alarm_forward_now(alarm, ptr->it_interval, true);
- ++ptr->it_signal_seq;
- ptr->it_status = POSIX_TIMER_ARMED;
- result = ALARMTIMER_RESTART;
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ptr->it_lock, flags);
+ guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&ptr->it_lock);
+ posix_timer_queue_signal(ptr);
- return result;
+ return ALARMTIMER_NORESTART;
}
/**
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -602,21 +602,11 @@ static void cpu_timer_fire(struct k_itim
*/
wake_up_process(timer->it_process);
cpu_timer_setexpires(ctmr, 0);
- } else if (!timer->it_interval) {
- /*
- * One-shot timer. Clear it as soon as it's fired.
- */
+ } else {
posix_timer_queue_signal(timer);
- cpu_timer_setexpires(ctmr, 0);
- } else if (posix_timer_queue_signal(timer)) {
- /*
- * The signal did not get queued because the signal
- * was ignored, so we won't get any callback to
- * reload the timer. But we need to keep it
- * ticking in case the signal is deliverable next time.
- */
- posix_cpu_timer_rearm(timer);
- ++timer->it_signal_seq;
+ /* Disable oneshot timers */
+ if (!timer->it_interval)
+ cpu_timer_setexpires(ctmr, 0);
}
}
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -300,21 +300,12 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct ke
return ret;
}
-int posix_timer_queue_signal(struct k_itimer *timr)
+void posix_timer_queue_signal(struct k_itimer *timr)
{
- enum posix_timer_state state = POSIX_TIMER_DISARMED;
- int ret;
-
lockdep_assert_held(&timr->it_lock);
- if (timr->it_interval)
- state = POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING;
-
- timr->it_status = state;
-
- ret = posixtimer_send_sigqueue(timr);
- /* If we failed to send the signal the timer stops. */
- return ret > 0;
+ timr->it_status = timr->it_interval ? POSIX_TIMER_REQUEUE_PENDING : POSIX_TIMER_DISARMED;
+ posixtimer_send_sigqueue(timr);
}
/*
@@ -327,62 +318,10 @@ int posix_timer_queue_signal(struct k_it
static enum hrtimer_restart posix_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *timer)
{
struct k_itimer *timr = container_of(timer, struct k_itimer, it.real.timer);
- enum hrtimer_restart ret = HRTIMER_NORESTART;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&timr->it_lock, flags);
-
- if (posix_timer_queue_signal(timr)) {
- /*
- * The signal was not queued due to SIG_IGN. As a
- * consequence the timer is not going to be rearmed from
- * the signal delivery path. But as a real signal handler
- * can be installed later the timer must be rearmed here.
- */
- if (timr->it_interval != 0) {
- ktime_t now = hrtimer_cb_get_time(timer);
- /*
- * FIXME: What we really want, is to stop this
- * timer completely and restart it in case the
- * SIG_IGN is removed. This is a non trivial
- * change to the signal handling code.
- *
- * For now let timers with an interval less than a
- * jiffy expire every jiffy and recheck for a
- * valid signal handler.
- *
- * This avoids interrupt starvation in case of a
- * very small interval, which would expire the
- * timer immediately again.
- *
- * Moving now ahead of time by one jiffy tricks
- * hrtimer_forward() to expire the timer later,
- * while it still maintains the overrun accuracy
- * for the price of a slight inconsistency in the
- * timer_gettime() case. This is at least better
- * than a timer storm.
- *
- * Only required when high resolution timers are
- * enabled as the periodic tick based timers are
- * automatically aligned to the next tick.
- */
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS)) {
- ktime_t kj = TICK_NSEC;
-
- if (timr->it_interval < kj)
- now = ktime_add(now, kj);
- }
-
- timr->it_overrun += hrtimer_forward(timer, now, timr->it_interval);
- ret = HRTIMER_RESTART;
- ++timr->it_signal_seq;
- timr->it_status = POSIX_TIMER_ARMED;
- }
- }
-
- unlock_timer(timr, flags);
- return ret;
+ guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&timr->it_lock);
+ posix_timer_queue_signal(timr);
+ return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
}
static struct pid *good_sigevent(sigevent_t * event)
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.h
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.h
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ extern const struct k_clock clock_proces
extern const struct k_clock clock_thread;
extern const struct k_clock alarm_clock;
-int posix_timer_queue_signal(struct k_itimer *timr);
+void posix_timer_queue_signal(struct k_itimer *timr);
void common_timer_get(struct k_itimer *timr, struct itimerspec64 *cur_setting);
int common_timer_set(struct k_itimer *timr, int flags,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* [patch v6 19/20] alarmtimers: Remove the throttle mechanism from alarm_forward_now()
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 18/20] posix-timers: Cleanup SIG_IGN workaround leftovers Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 20/20] alarmtimers: Remove return value from alarm functions Thomas Gleixner
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Now that ignored posix timer signals are requeued and the timers are
rearmed on signal delivery the workaround to keep such timers alive and
self rearm them is not longer required.
Remove the unused alarm timer parts.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/time/alarmtimer.c | 28 ++--------------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
---
--- a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
@@ -467,35 +467,11 @@ u64 alarm_forward(struct alarm *alarm, k
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(alarm_forward);
-static u64 __alarm_forward_now(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t interval, bool throttle)
+u64 alarm_forward_now(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t interval)
{
struct alarm_base *base = &alarm_bases[alarm->type];
- ktime_t now = base->get_ktime();
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS) && throttle) {
- /*
- * Same issue as with posix_timer_fn(). Timers which are
- * periodic but the signal is ignored can starve the system
- * with a very small interval. The real fix which was
- * promised in the context of posix_timer_fn() never
- * materialized, but someone should really work on it.
- *
- * To prevent DOS fake @now to be 1 jiffy out which keeps
- * the overrun accounting correct but creates an
- * inconsistency vs. timer_gettime(2).
- */
- ktime_t kj = NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ;
- if (interval < kj)
- now = ktime_add(now, kj);
- }
-
- return alarm_forward(alarm, now, interval);
-}
-
-u64 alarm_forward_now(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t interval)
-{
- return __alarm_forward_now(alarm, interval, false);
+ return alarm_forward(alarm, base->get_ktime(), interval);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(alarm_forward_now);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* [patch v6 20/20] alarmtimers: Remove return value from alarm functions
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 19/20] alarmtimers: Remove the throttle mechanism from alarm_forward_now() Thomas Gleixner
@ 2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
19 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-10-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, John Stultz,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Stephen Boyd, Eric Biederman,
Oleg Nesterov
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Now that the SIG_IGN problem is solved in the core code, the alarmtimer
callbacks do not require a return value anymore.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c | 3 +--
fs/timerfd.c | 4 +---
include/linux/alarmtimer.h | 10 ++--------
kernel/time/alarmtimer.c | 16 +++++-----------
net/netfilter/xt_IDLETIMER.c | 4 +---
5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
---
--- a/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
@@ -1412,10 +1412,9 @@ static inline struct charger_desc *cm_ge
return dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
}
-static enum alarmtimer_restart cm_timer_func(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t now)
+static void cm_timer_func(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t now)
{
cm_timer_set = false;
- return ALARMTIMER_NORESTART;
}
static int charger_manager_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
--- a/fs/timerfd.c
+++ b/fs/timerfd.c
@@ -79,13 +79,11 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart timerfd_tmrp
return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
}
-static enum alarmtimer_restart timerfd_alarmproc(struct alarm *alarm,
- ktime_t now)
+static void timerfd_alarmproc(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t now)
{
struct timerfd_ctx *ctx = container_of(alarm, struct timerfd_ctx,
t.alarm);
timerfd_triggered(ctx);
- return ALARMTIMER_NORESTART;
}
/*
--- a/include/linux/alarmtimer.h
+++ b/include/linux/alarmtimer.h
@@ -20,12 +20,6 @@ enum alarmtimer_type {
ALARM_BOOTTIME_FREEZER,
};
-enum alarmtimer_restart {
- ALARMTIMER_NORESTART,
- ALARMTIMER_RESTART,
-};
-
-
#define ALARMTIMER_STATE_INACTIVE 0x00
#define ALARMTIMER_STATE_ENQUEUED 0x01
@@ -42,14 +36,14 @@ enum alarmtimer_restart {
struct alarm {
struct timerqueue_node node;
struct hrtimer timer;
- enum alarmtimer_restart (*function)(struct alarm *, ktime_t now);
+ void (*function)(struct alarm *, ktime_t now);
enum alarmtimer_type type;
int state;
void *data;
};
void alarm_init(struct alarm *alarm, enum alarmtimer_type type,
- enum alarmtimer_restart (*function)(struct alarm *, ktime_t));
+ void (*function)(struct alarm *, ktime_t));
void alarm_start(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t start);
void alarm_start_relative(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t start);
void alarm_restart(struct alarm *alarm);
--- a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static int alarmtimer_resume(struct devi
static void
__alarm_init(struct alarm *alarm, enum alarmtimer_type type,
- enum alarmtimer_restart (*function)(struct alarm *, ktime_t))
+ void (*function)(struct alarm *, ktime_t))
{
timerqueue_init(&alarm->node);
alarm->timer.function = alarmtimer_fired;
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static void
* @function: callback that is run when the alarm fires
*/
void alarm_init(struct alarm *alarm, enum alarmtimer_type type,
- enum alarmtimer_restart (*function)(struct alarm *, ktime_t))
+ void (*function)(struct alarm *, ktime_t))
{
hrtimer_init(&alarm->timer, alarm_bases[type].base_clockid,
HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
@@ -530,14 +530,12 @@ static enum alarmtimer_type clock2alarm(
*
* Return: whether the timer is to be restarted
*/
-static enum alarmtimer_restart alarm_handle_timer(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t now)
+static void alarm_handle_timer(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t now)
{
struct k_itimer *ptr = container_of(alarm, struct k_itimer, it.alarm.alarmtimer);
guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&ptr->it_lock);
posix_timer_queue_signal(ptr);
-
- return ALARMTIMER_NORESTART;
}
/**
@@ -698,18 +696,14 @@ static int alarm_timer_create(struct k_i
* @now: time at the timer expiration
*
* Wakes up the task that set the alarmtimer
- *
- * Return: ALARMTIMER_NORESTART
*/
-static enum alarmtimer_restart alarmtimer_nsleep_wakeup(struct alarm *alarm,
- ktime_t now)
+static void alarmtimer_nsleep_wakeup(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t now)
{
struct task_struct *task = alarm->data;
alarm->data = NULL;
if (task)
wake_up_process(task);
- return ALARMTIMER_NORESTART;
}
/**
@@ -761,7 +755,7 @@ static int alarmtimer_do_nsleep(struct a
static void
alarm_init_on_stack(struct alarm *alarm, enum alarmtimer_type type,
- enum alarmtimer_restart (*function)(struct alarm *, ktime_t))
+ void (*function)(struct alarm *, ktime_t))
{
hrtimer_init_on_stack(&alarm->timer, alarm_bases[type].base_clockid,
HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_IDLETIMER.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_IDLETIMER.c
@@ -107,14 +107,12 @@ static void idletimer_tg_expired(struct
schedule_work(&timer->work);
}
-static enum alarmtimer_restart idletimer_tg_alarmproc(struct alarm *alarm,
- ktime_t now)
+static void idletimer_tg_alarmproc(struct alarm *alarm, ktime_t now)
{
struct idletimer_tg *timer = alarm->data;
pr_debug("alarm %s expired\n", timer->attr.attr.name);
schedule_work(&timer->work);
- return ALARMTIMER_NORESTART;
}
static int idletimer_check_sysfs_name(const char *name, unsigned int size)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread