From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B89A433CA; Thu, 30 May 2024 19:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717099069; cv=none; b=DCWTa2gAlvU0P1BlNDqX7A4KmX6mv2sBwPIMDJXMJsBW52MNa2s1T0h50XeBFkIex/5qmN/ix84GULAbSrklrvp5xDtVpYI/jEw4P52wDKq7n1XgLTIvkEUQXIDMQ56HSXObbQ9ZPbkp1VrYmBTUr17+zd7GsyWDAYVVigzVfA8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717099069; c=relaxed/simple; bh=70Z6Hwch5cDX1Yag0UqBCh6oP6TsMaD/hqajVrV9aAI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HXPuk2s8iCsVkuW4uQjz1MgJQULnOQeXxZ6IQZJ938Hzj9vFZkx7Hssaf+npUlbWgWwL1pBEHsmvrY4o1LkKiKoxk3eywpsx0w/yiWxESnakZENS7AOruGBvJC9anepoyI/8u7P7ZX1RKfIgXViUBGda4XInzTRrVsILSOPtIII= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=NINj71SQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="NINj71SQ" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 8FA1A47C39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1717099065; bh=70Z6Hwch5cDX1Yag0UqBCh6oP6TsMaD/hqajVrV9aAI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=NINj71SQ5RKm42gjS56ALOFe5BwtgBRPzAFWF7Sp8OLpdSxFbuhOPHp6rezJ6qIYx 7zIQTrLkA/SAVPpfCTsdkkANt/rTREKwRWdSfc8Ep2GnShsFVOMn6lwnogaEtbfoos Hwm9Kx3qYgZaNpPyFQzYpVVp1agJF0A5MaNVaJIQSNmkdKuzkLcJrrpXwX8ZxVyI57 1iYXELLAdUzpEFYbIZUI93Jsps27HR8PQ6bj9FYkW4nCe6h+XyBxZwqdCs7HujaqYa S3yZw9ZlFThOfJDyYxXBC0birY9a4cGgvfUTjXjuUVgq2GTQJt8ozj4/jgSiTDRJv4 UJwu82eIUJ2hA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FA1A47C39; Thu, 30 May 2024 19:57:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Karel Balej , Thorsten Leemhuis , regressions@lists.linux.dev, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: balejk@matfyz.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH docs-next v3] docs: handling-regressions.rst: recommend using "Closes:" tags In-Reply-To: <20240513084145.2460-1-balejk@matfyz.cz> References: <20240513084145.2460-1-balejk@matfyz.cz> Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 13:57:44 -0600 Message-ID: <871q5jcbt3.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Karel Balej writes: > Update the handling-regressions guide to recommend using "Closes:" tags > rather than "Link:" when referencing fixed reports. The latter was used > originally but now is only recommended when the given patch only fixes > part of the issue, as described in submitting-patches. Briefly mention > that and also note that regzbot currently doesn't make a distinction. > > Also fix a typo. > > Acked-by: Thorsten Leemhuis > Signed-off-by: Karel Balej > --- Applied, thanks. jon