* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-13 17:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-02-13 19:03 ` SeongJae Park
2024-02-13 19:34 ` Pavel Machek
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-02-13 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, damon,
SeongJae Park
Hello,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 18:20:46 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:18:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] b29c5b14893f ("Linux 6.1.78-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-13 17:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-13 19:03 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-02-13 19:34 ` Pavel Machek
2024-02-13 21:04 ` Kelsey Steele
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-02-13 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 658 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-13 17:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-13 19:03 ` SeongJae Park
2024-02-13 19:34 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-02-13 21:04 ` Kelsey Steele
2024-02-13 21:15 ` Florian Fainelli
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Steele @ 2024-02-13 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 06:20:46PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:18:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
No regressions found on WSL (x86 and arm64).
Built, booted, and reviewed dmesg.
Thank you.
Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-13 17:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-13 21:04 ` Kelsey Steele
@ 2024-02-13 21:15 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-13 22:46 ` Allen
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-02-13 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml
On 2/13/24 09:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:18:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-13 17:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-13 21:15 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-02-13 22:46 ` Allen
2024-02-14 0:17 ` Shuah Khan
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Allen @ 2024-02-13 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:18:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-13 17:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-13 22:46 ` Allen
@ 2024-02-14 0:17 ` Shuah Khan
2024-02-14 9:03 ` Jon Hunter
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-02-14 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, Shuah Khan
On 2/13/24 10:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:18:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-13 17:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-14 0:17 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-02-14 9:03 ` Jon Hunter
2024-02-14 13:08 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-14 11:07 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-02-14 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Hi Greg,
On 13/02/2024 17:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:18:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Builds are failing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 3 pass, 7 fail
6 boots: 6 pass, 0 fail
18 tests: 18 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.78-rc1-gb29c5b14893f
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Builds failed: aarch64+defconfig+jetson, arm+multi_v7
> Furong Xu <0x1207@gmail.com>
> net: stmmac: xgmac: fix handling of DPP safety error for DMA channels
The above commit is causing a build regression for older toolchains and
I have reported this [0]. This is also seen on the mainline and -next and
there is a fix in the works [1].
Note this is breaking the build for linux-6.6.y and linux-6.7.y too.
Jon
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/c25eb595-8d91-40ea-9f52-efa15ebafdbc@nvidia.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240208-xgmac-const-v1-1-e69a1eeabfc8@kernel.org/
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-14 9:03 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-02-14 13:08 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-14 13:15 ` Jon Hunter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-02-14 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Hunter
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 09:03:59AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 13/02/2024 17:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:18:29 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> Builds are failing for Tegra ...
>
> Test results for stable-v6.1:
> 10 builds: 3 pass, 7 fail
> 6 boots: 6 pass, 0 fail
> 18 tests: 18 pass, 0 fail
>
> Linux version: 6.1.78-rc1-gb29c5b14893f
> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana,
> tegra30-cardhu-a04
>
> Builds failed: aarch64+defconfig+jetson, arm+multi_v7
>
>
> > Furong Xu <0x1207@gmail.com>
> > net: stmmac: xgmac: fix handling of DPP safety error for DMA channels
>
> The above commit is causing a build regression for older toolchains and
> I have reported this [0]. This is also seen on the mainline and -next and
> there is a fix in the works [1].
>
> Note this is breaking the build for linux-6.6.y and linux-6.7.y too.
Thanks, I've now queued up the fix. Do you need me to push out a -rc2
for this issue for your testing?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-14 13:08 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-02-14 13:15 ` Jon Hunter
2024-02-14 14:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-02-14 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
On 14/02/2024 13:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 09:03:59AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On 13/02/2024 17:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
>>> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:18:29 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>>
>> Builds are failing for Tegra ...
>>
>> Test results for stable-v6.1:
>> 10 builds: 3 pass, 7 fail
>> 6 boots: 6 pass, 0 fail
>> 18 tests: 18 pass, 0 fail
>>
>> Linux version: 6.1.78-rc1-gb29c5b14893f
>> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana,
>> tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>
>> Builds failed: aarch64+defconfig+jetson, arm+multi_v7
>>
>>
>>> Furong Xu <0x1207@gmail.com>
>>> net: stmmac: xgmac: fix handling of DPP safety error for DMA channels
>>
>> The above commit is causing a build regression for older toolchains and
>> I have reported this [0]. This is also seen on the mainline and -next and
>> there is a fix in the works [1].
>>
>> Note this is breaking the build for linux-6.6.y and linux-6.7.y too.
>
> Thanks, I've now queued up the fix. Do you need me to push out a -rc2
> for this issue for your testing?
Ideally yes. That would be great.
Thanks
Jon
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-14 13:15 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-02-14 14:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-02-14 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Hunter
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 01:15:47PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 14/02/2024 13:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 09:03:59AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > On 13/02/2024 17:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> > > > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:18:29 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > >
> > >
> > > Builds are failing for Tegra ...
> > >
> > > Test results for stable-v6.1:
> > > 10 builds: 3 pass, 7 fail
> > > 6 boots: 6 pass, 0 fail
> > > 18 tests: 18 pass, 0 fail
> > >
> > > Linux version: 6.1.78-rc1-gb29c5b14893f
> > > Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana,
> > > tegra30-cardhu-a04
> > >
> > > Builds failed: aarch64+defconfig+jetson, arm+multi_v7
> > >
> > >
> > > > Furong Xu <0x1207@gmail.com>
> > > > net: stmmac: xgmac: fix handling of DPP safety error for DMA channels
> > >
> > > The above commit is causing a build regression for older toolchains and
> > > I have reported this [0]. This is also seen on the mainline and -next and
> > > there is a fix in the works [1].
> > >
> > > Note this is breaking the build for linux-6.6.y and linux-6.7.y too.
> >
> > Thanks, I've now queued up the fix. Do you need me to push out a -rc2
> > for this issue for your testing?
>
>
> Ideally yes. That would be great.
Ok, will do in a few minutes, thanks for testing!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-13 17:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-14 9:03 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-02-14 11:07 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-02-14 11:22 ` Yann Sionneau
2024-02-14 16:44 ` Sven Joachim
9 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-02-14 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 22:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:18:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.78-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: b29c5b14893f8c7e4ce99e7ee1c69848798a686f
* git describe: v6.1.77-65-gb29c5b14893f
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.77-65-gb29c5b14893f
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.77)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.77)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.77)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.77)
## Test result summary
total: 134243, pass: 114089, fail: 2705, skip: 17286, xfail: 163
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 135 passed, 16 failed
* arm64: 52 total, 47 passed, 5 failed
* i386: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 33 passed, 3 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 16 total, 15 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 46 total, 45 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-13 17:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-14 11:07 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-02-14 11:22 ` Yann Sionneau
2024-02-14 16:44 ` Sven Joachim
9 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yann Sionneau @ 2024-02-14 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
Hi Greg,
On 13/02/2024 18:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:18:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
I tested 6.1.78-rc1 (b29c5b14893f) on Kalray kvx arch (not upstream yet), just to let you know everything works in our CI.
It ran on real hw (k200, k200lp and k300 boards), on qemu as well as on our internal instruction set simulator (ISS).
Tests were run on several interfaces/drivers (usb, qsfp ethernet, eMMC, PCIe endpoint+RC, SPI, remoteproc, uart, iommu). LTP and uClibc-ng testsuites are also run without any regression.
Everything looks fine to us.
Tested-by: Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@kalrayinc.com>
Thanks a lot!
--
Yann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review
2024-02-13 17:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/64] 6.1.78-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-14 11:22 ` Yann Sionneau
@ 2024-02-14 16:44 ` Sven Joachim
9 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sven Joachim @ 2024-02-14 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On 2024-02-13 18:20 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:18:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Works fine for me on x86_64.
Tested-by: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
Cheers,
Sven
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread