From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BFDC54FB9 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344994AbjKPKPb (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Nov 2023 05:15:31 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37406 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230287AbjKPKP3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Nov 2023 05:15:29 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED0ABD6F for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 02:15:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1700129727; x=1731665727; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=5BlnmANSnRsKUHJF/sb0ywtqgmtFH8pDdWcj5GLx5m4=; b=S5wdy5uTwnNC8a8ZzyCeAZT8+eM52EOMKFIhRbqYRESYElwgOce6eRXM FtCxIuVNxb+E2royrZoGn8CGLOqQpUWatXwMddXcaBqy9bXYvlGQbfu+k sS3X7/mbZ38veMMDPc+5esSghwNTNgCW1MZMJYK01ScAjg3bCsqTjJGuG nUhcli0qdGySJH+8WWoo7uhtL3FpFzMWfqGipZVTl3QosE2luEU4eLsZ+ Jc1sx4Kmu05Ttw5y6W5tdohnQJ33JkBBOT1tSrgzzuNmVmjcDgBATjf0L /+gdEJX4pb8NeA5/yNmL3TXe6u1eic+M9edAajogA8RtbcMxCEIIXndbW Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10895"; a="9701219" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,308,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="9701219" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2023 02:15:09 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10895"; a="1096746142" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,308,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="1096746142" Received: from oroos-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.41.17]) by fmsmga005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2023 02:15:05 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: Hans de Goede , Andy Shevchenko , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Tvrtko Ursulin , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 00/16] drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20231103201831.1037416-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:15:03 +0200 Message-ID: <871qcqqa1k.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Hans de Goede wrote: > Ok, this now has been testen on both a BYT and a CHT device which > actually use GPIO controls in their MIPI sequences so this > series is: > > Tested-by: Hans de Goede > > And the code of the entire series also looks good to me: > > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede > > for the series. Thanks Andy & Hans! I'll merge this once the test results are in. The BAT results have been a bit flaky recently, so needed to do a rerun. That said, I'm not sure if we have any hardware in CI that would actually exercise the modifications, so in that sense I trust Hans' testing much more. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel