From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v3 5/6] printk: introduce console_get_next_message() and console_message
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:32:30 +0106 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qoafve1.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7RP5zuALa552AHY@alley>
On 2023-01-03, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
>> The current atomic console proposal allocates 1x cbuf per-cpu and 4x
>> meta-data per-cpu. Different contexts of a cpu will have different
>> meta-data, but all the contexts of a cpu will share the same cbuf.
>>
>> If cbufs become embedded in cmsg, then we would allocate 1x cmsg
>> per-cpu. But the atomic consoles would still need their own 4x per-cpu
>> meta-data.
>
> Do we really need 4x the meta data?
Having per-context meta-data helps minimize data clobbering. For
example, the message-formatting functions would not need to worry about
@cmsg->len changing underneath them. This can be solved with a
READ_ONCE() to a local variable and the function only using the local
copy, but it will mean more copying of variables.
> The metadata describe the state of the buffer. Using the buffer in one
> context invalidates the metadata in the other context.
Yes, but the message-formatting functions are the ones preparing that
meta-data. They must then be able to handle an interrupting context
changing that meta-data.
>> For v4 I will drop the console_buffers struct. I will use your
>> suggestion.
>
> Please, do not do it just to make me happy. My intention
> is to keep things simple. And keeping the two structures
> synced needs an extra code.
>
> If you are sure that the separation will really be needed
> in the future then feel free to keep the two structures.
Currently the message-formatting functions do not care about clobbering
of the text buffers. They blindly just move things around using the
meta-data as safety boundaries. This can lead to a formatted-buffer that
contains garbage, but an interrupted context will not print that buffer
in the end. The important thing is that the garbage was created safely.
Avoiding a separate console_buffers structure may simplify the
structures, but it requires robustifying the message-formatting
functions to be tolerant for meta-data clobbering.
I am currently implementing such changes to see if it is feasible.
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-21 20:26 [PATCH printk v3 0/6] printk: cleanup buffer handling John Ogness
2022-12-21 20:26 ` [PATCH printk v3 1/6] printk: move size limit macros into internal.h John Ogness
2023-01-02 14:06 ` Petr Mladek
2022-12-21 20:27 ` [PATCH printk v3 2/6] console: Use BIT() macros for @flags values John Ogness
2022-12-21 20:27 ` [PATCH printk v3 3/6] console: Document struct console John Ogness
2022-12-21 20:27 ` [PATCH printk v3 4/6] printk: introduce struct console_buffers John Ogness
2023-01-02 15:15 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-03 10:04 ` John Ogness
2022-12-21 20:27 ` [PATCH printk v3 5/6] printk: introduce console_get_next_message() and console_message John Ogness
2022-12-22 15:41 ` John Ogness
2023-01-03 14:04 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-03 14:57 ` John Ogness
2023-01-03 15:55 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-04 10:26 ` John Ogness [this message]
2023-01-04 10:42 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-02 15:52 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-03 15:41 ` John Ogness
2023-01-03 10:02 ` John Ogness
2023-01-03 14:05 ` Petr Mladek
2022-12-21 20:27 ` [PATCH printk v3 6/6] printk: introduce console_prepend_dropped() for dropped messages John Ogness
2023-01-02 16:19 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-03 10:20 ` John Ogness
2023-01-03 13:29 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-03 13:44 ` John Ogness
2023-01-03 14:16 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-03 15:00 ` John Ogness
2023-01-03 16:13 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-04 9:06 ` John Ogness
2023-01-04 10:33 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-05 13:14 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-05 13:55 ` John Ogness
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871qoafve1.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox