Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/book3e: Fix set_memory_x() and set_memory_nx()

[Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>]

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 27/10/2021 à 06:44, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of October 26, 2021 3:39 pm:
>>> set_memory_x() calls pte_mkexec() which sets _PAGE_EXEC.
>>> set_memory_nx() calls pte_exprotec() which clears _PAGE_EXEC.
>>>
>>> Book3e has 2 bits, UX and SX, which defines the exec rights
>>> resp. for user (PR=1) and for kernel (PR=0).
>>>
>>> _PAGE_EXEC is defined as UX only.
>>>
>>> An executable kernel page is set with either _PAGE_KERNEL_RWX
>>> or _PAGE_KERNEL_ROX, which both have SX set and UX cleared.
>>>
>>> So set_memory_nx() call for an executable kernel page does
>>> nothing because UX is already cleared.
>>>
>>> And set_memory_x() on a non-executable kernel page makes it
>>> executable for the user and keeps it non-executable for kernel.
>>>
>>> Also, pte_exec() always returns 'false' on kernel pages, because
>>> it checks _PAGE_EXEC which doesn't include SX, so for instance
>>> the W+X check doesn't work.
>>>
>>> To fix this:
>>> - change tlb_low_64e.S to use _PAGE_BAP_UX instead of _PAGE_USER
>>> - sets both UX and SX in _PAGE_EXEC so that pte_user() returns
>>> true whenever one of the two bits is set
>> 
>> I don't understand this change. Which pte_user() returns true after
>> this change? Or do you mean pte_exec()?
>
> Oops, yes, I mean pte_exec()
>
> Unless I have to re-spin, can Michael eventually fix that typo while 
> applying ?

I did.

cheers