From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.stultz@linaro.org,
sboyd@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, Mark.Rutland@arm.com,
maz@kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, neeraju@codeaurora.org,
ak@linux.intel.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 22:45:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rbauffb.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414043602.2812981-2-paulmck@kernel.org>
On Tue, Apr 13 2021 at 21:35, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> #define WATCHDOG_INTERVAL (HZ >> 1)
> #define WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD (NSEC_PER_SEC >> 4)
Didn't we discuss that the threshold is too big ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 4:34 [PATCH v8 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays for v5.13 Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-14 4:35 ` [PATCH v8 clocksource 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-16 20:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-16 22:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-14 4:35 ` [PATCH v8 clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-16 20:45 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-04-17 0:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-17 12:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-17 22:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-17 23:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-17 23:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-14 4:36 ` [PATCH v8 clocksource 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-17 12:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-17 23:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-17 12:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-17 23:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-18 16:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-14 4:36 ` [PATCH v8 clocksource 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-14 4:36 ` [PATCH v8 clocksource 5/5] clocksource: Limit number of CPUs checked for clock synchronization Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871rbauffb.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox