From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel: don't store initrd's start
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:44:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871t2hd34l.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160725164602.GC11976@nazgul.tnic> (Borislav Petkov's message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:46:02 +0200")
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> writes:
> Yeah, we should tie this to CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY. IOW, here's another
> version, I'll do some more hammering on it tomorrow.
Boots fine and updates microcode (as always, on top of next-20160722).
> It should take care of the builtin case too as there we have the
> microcode in the kernel text mapping which is already relocated when we
> go search for microcode blobs so no need for adjusting start then.
Now that you've got basically the same #ifdefery and if(->valid)'s in
your final result as I did, may I ask whether you would still consider
it as being simpler? In particular, what's the point of having that
->start if it's redundant and has to be corrected in a more or less
hackish way anyway?
Thanks,
Nicolai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-25 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-24 15:05 [PATCH] arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel: don't store initrd's start Nicolai Stange
2016-07-25 7:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-07-25 9:24 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-07-25 12:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-07-25 12:59 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-07-25 13:06 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-07-25 13:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-07-25 14:16 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-07-25 14:27 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-07-25 16:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-07-25 15:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-07-25 16:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-07-25 17:44 ` Nicolai Stange [this message]
2016-07-25 18:18 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871t2hd34l.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=nicstange@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox