From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1161649AbcFBSGc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:06:32 -0400
Received: from anholt.net ([50.246.234.109]:37526 "EHLO anholt.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1161591AbcFBSGO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:06:14 -0400
From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
        "open list\:IRQCHIP DRIVERS" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list\:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/32] irqchip: bcm2835: Avoid arch/arm-specific handle_IRQ.
In-Reply-To: <20160602005044.GN24391@io.lakedaemon.net>
References: <1464817421-8519-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1464817421-8519-4-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <20160602005044.GN24391@io.lakedaemon.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 11:06:10 -0700
Message-ID: <871t4fbh4d.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> writes:

> Hey Gerd,
>
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:43:12PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
>>=20
>> This is equivalent and works for arm64 as well.
>>=20
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
>> ---
>
> I don't mind taking this, or Eric's V2 resend.  However, the commit
> message needs a rewrite.

Can you clarify what you don't like about it or suggest replacement
wording?  This is the first concern I've seen.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXUHWTAAoJELXWKTbR/J7oeIAQAILz10DlvlG+6oNPHOSFtuDT
dOA+dq47yftZFpGQWoc631Wtk7YotYCMhU2sjYISQub+OU/sDmyWRYh0hRzL61PN
YaFH4IeF7ixQqRVQYSAc7GEkD+ljaIq1E5Zet/BJu1TuJ3zG64rEg1Cw0ohkTgzS
I7K4QOdnyBuowS04SxAuKsDUwakdy0x5wYzHsBbiS7HLGzxiAo2WHWHos0h+6hlp
uYD5nYb+QVx4rl+J4q/3Kr1qdrisw43Jy4ay/7Uy2jG1lSWPP9T6IDW8KOJ0IWyc
EQdfIEbyr/LfKtgX2+H7Zla1hSUKW+I3owDo2uNOlcYZ13MhxB30N+TNG5Z5+XCt
fM0uEqT3z6SEI+ng+psSwZqLL92aigD5rCtvlN7IsmYv+lMd87ojw4EMMpDzcRAh
6WoY03F3fkaaXLnZ6hOKF4hx+8qNWkdOxoGp2FXWGXuAuofY1VubR1LttTeZGWpR
tZtSppBznSEaITXEr9+aCnQ0tszbb/uHhP8AfsOmHR4cqOCoYUVyna6C07B4m1Sn
go2Au2EnJKRL1lr9a3u3H/iB+p1qABOB8k7igmt4KkMjUJIED55ijYsXgvk75A2Z
aZRKNklebXn8SQ879700hYfsWMvlYAiylYHkBfBSEbQyxXmNUvmG59EYAfMC/vVT
pkZlgRIHqMiKKmxoG8Ki
=2VJ8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--