public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Chen Gong <gong.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joshua Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ACPI, APEI: Memory leaks
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:21:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871t8ed5f0.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454352468-14371-1-git-send-email-johunt@akamai.com> (Joshua Hunt's message of "Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:47:46 -0500")

Hi, Gong,

Joshua Hunt <johunt@akamai.com> writes:

> While investigating a possible memory leak using kmemleak I came across the
> following five leaks coming from APEI and ERST:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff880402b6ee80 (size 32):
>   comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294669373 (age 318.183s)
>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>     58 fe ab fa 03 88 ff ff 58 fe ab fa 03 88 ff ff  X.......X.......
>     18 50 ea dc 00 00 00 00 3f 50 ea dc 00 00 00 00  .P......?P......
>   backtrace:
>     [<ffffffff82195c33>] create_object+0x103/0x2c0
>     [<ffffffff826868b2>] kmemleak_alloc+0x82/0xc0
>     [<ffffffff8218248b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x17b/0x210
>     [<ffffffff8241a6fa>] apei_res_add+0x19a/0x200
>     [<ffffffff8241a7e2>] collect_res_callback+0x82/0xa0
>     [<ffffffff8241a225>] apei_exec_for_each_entry+0x85/0xb0
>     [<ffffffff8241a26a>] apei_exec_collect_resources+0x1a/0x20
>     [<ffffffff82afe532>] erst_init+0x3d6/0x3e5
>     [<ffffffff820004bd>] do_one_initcall+0x19d/0x1d0
>     [<ffffffff82ac1152>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13d/0x1d6
>     [<ffffffff82684a8e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0
>     [<ffffffff826909d2>] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70
>     [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> unreferenced object 0xffff880402b6ee40 (size 32):
>   comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294670231 (age 317.326s)
>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>     68 fe ab fa 03 88 ff ff 68 fe ab fa 03 88 ff ff  h.......h.......
>     b2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 b3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>   backtrace:
>     [<ffffffff82195c33>] create_object+0x103/0x2c0
>     [<ffffffff826868b2>] kmemleak_alloc+0x82/0xc0
>     [<ffffffff8218248b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x17b/0x210
>     [<ffffffff8241a6fa>] apei_res_add+0x19a/0x200
>     [<ffffffff8241a7fc>] collect_res_callback+0x9c/0xa0
>     [<ffffffff8241a225>] apei_exec_for_each_entry+0x85/0xb0
>     [<ffffffff8241a26a>] apei_exec_collect_resources+0x1a/0x20
>     [<ffffffff82afe532>] erst_init+0x3d6/0x3e5
>     [<ffffffff820004bd>] do_one_initcall+0x19d/0x1d0
>     [<ffffffff82ac1152>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13d/0x1d6
>     [<ffffffff82684a8e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0
>     [<ffffffff826909d2>] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70
>     [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> unreferenced object 0xffff880402b6ee20 (size 32):
>   comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294672240 (age 315.317s)
>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>     88 fd ab fa 03 88 ff ff 00 ee b6 02 04 88 ff ff  ................
>     00 d0 15 cd 00 00 00 00 00 40 16 cd 00 00 00 00  .........@......
>   backtrace:
>     [<ffffffff82195c33>] create_object+0x103/0x2c0
>     [<ffffffff826868b2>] kmemleak_alloc+0x82/0xc0
>     [<ffffffff8218248b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x17b/0x210
>     [<ffffffff8241a6fa>] apei_res_add+0x19a/0x200
>     [<ffffffff8241a81a>] apei_get_res_callback+0x1a/0x20
>     [<ffffffff823d0f8b>] acpi_nvs_for_each_region+0x2b/0x50
>     [<ffffffff8241ae95>] apei_resources_request+0x95/0x380
>     [<ffffffff82afe23e>] erst_init+0xe2/0x3e5
>     [<ffffffff820004bd>] do_one_initcall+0x19d/0x1d0
>     [<ffffffff82ac1152>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13d/0x1d6
>     [<ffffffff82684a8e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0
>     [<ffffffff826909d2>] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70
>     [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> unreferenced object 0xffff880402b6ee00 (size 32):
>   comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294672400 (age 315.157s)
>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>     20 ee b6 02 04 88 ff ff 88 fd ab fa 03 88 ff ff   ...............
>     00 80 f3 dc 00 00 00 00 00 60 a9 dd 00 00 00 00  .........`......
>   backtrace:
>     [<ffffffff82195c33>] create_object+0x103/0x2c0
>     [<ffffffff826868b2>] kmemleak_alloc+0x82/0xc0
>     [<ffffffff8218248b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x17b/0x210
>     [<ffffffff8241a6fa>] apei_res_add+0x19a/0x200
>     [<ffffffff8241a81a>] apei_get_res_callback+0x1a/0x20
>     [<ffffffff823d0f8b>] acpi_nvs_for_each_region+0x2b/0x50
>     [<ffffffff8241ae95>] apei_resources_request+0x95/0x380
>     [<ffffffff82afe23e>] erst_init+0xe2/0x3e5
>     [<ffffffff820004bd>] do_one_initcall+0x19d/0x1d0
>     [<ffffffff82ac1152>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13d/0x1d6
>     [<ffffffff82684a8e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0
>     [<ffffffff826909d2>] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70
>     [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> unreferenced object 0xffff880402b6ede0 (size 32):
>   comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294672863 (age 314.698s)
>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>     a8 fd ab fa 03 88 ff ff a8 fd ab fa 03 88 ff ff  ................
>     00 00 00 f8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc 00 00 00 00  ................
>   backtrace:
>     [<ffffffff82195c33>] create_object+0x103/0x2c0
>     [<ffffffff826868b2>] kmemleak_alloc+0x82/0xc0
>     [<ffffffff8218248b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x17b/0x210
>     [<ffffffff8241a6fa>] apei_res_add+0x19a/0x200
>     [<ffffffff8241a81a>] apei_get_res_callback+0x1a/0x20
>     [<ffffffff82582d61>] pci_mmcfg_for_each_region+0x51/0x60
>     [<ffffffff8241b14a>] apei_resources_request+0x34a/0x380
>     [<ffffffff82afe23e>] erst_init+0xe2/0x3e5
>     [<ffffffff820004bd>] do_one_initcall+0x19d/0x1d0
>     [<ffffffff82ac1152>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13d/0x1d6
>     [<ffffffff82684a8e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0
>     [<ffffffff826909d2>] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70
>     [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> The issue has been reported a handful of times upstream. Here is one of the previous
> reports: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/11/149
>
> This series resolves the reported leaks and kmemleak is clean with these patches applied.
>
> Joshua Hunt (2):
>   ACPI, APEI: Fix leaked resources
>   ACPI, APEI, ERST: Fixed leaked resources in erst_init
>
>  drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c |    5 +++++
>  drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c      |    2 ++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

Do you have time to take a look at this patchset?

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-15  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-01 18:47 [PATCH 0/2] ACPI, APEI: Memory leaks Joshua Hunt
2016-02-01 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI, APEI: Fix leaked resources Joshua Hunt
2016-02-01 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI, APEI, ERST: Fixed leaked resources in erst_init Joshua Hunt
2016-02-15  3:21 ` Huang, Ying [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871t8ed5f0.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=gong.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=johunt@akamai.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox