From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965726AbbDWMzH (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:55:07 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com ([209.85.217.179]:33255 "EHLO mail-lb0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965642AbbDWMzF (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:55:05 -0400 From: Rasmus Villemoes To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H.J. Lu" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: use -mskip-rax-setup when available Organization: D03 References: <1429532896-10265-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20150420150735.GA10191@pd.tnic> <87k2x64kfn.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20150420204140.GB10149@pd.tnic> <87618nm7n9.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20150423122959.GG28327@pd.tnic> X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org::n8kue29KZJL1iVdz:00000000000000000000000000000000009Xi X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:hjl.tools@gmail.com::9YwAKhII81kpjw6R:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000rOR X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:bp@alien8.de::WHohJvgjPldtQvwW:000003xhD X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:mingo@redhat.com::/I1h0Kry1q4lxQYz:04fOG X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:hpa@zytor.com::bVPWXHEciQ253Qzl:000075AV X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:x86@kernel.org::Y8FyLBCoAA6Mg+7C:0006FAH X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:tglx@linutronix.de::9/giG5jwEPgHBynN:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000009RZM Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:55:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150423122959.GG28327@pd.tnic> (Borislav Petkov's message of "Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:29:59 +0200") Message-ID: <871tjbm2c9.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 23 2015, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> > or you want attribution or ...? >> >> That would be nice. > > I fail to see for what - I see H.J. Lu's patch from Dec. 2014 and you > repeating the same patch months later. I think we're talking past each other. What I'd like credit for is coming up with the idea of omitting the xor %eax,%eax in the first place (the original mail was sent to x86@kernel.org [cc'ed to a few x86 maintainers], but that doesn't seem to be publicly archived). So it is very much not about (attribution for) the Makefile patch itself. > [...] it is his patch which should go because it was the first. It is > only fair this way IMO. Agreed - all I ask for is being mentioned somewhere in the commit log. Again, I only sent the April 20 patch because I hadn't seen anything happen since December. Rasmus