From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, agraf@suse.de, drjones@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, zhichao.huang@linaro.org,
jan.kiszka@siemens.com, dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
r65777@freescale.com, bp@suse.de,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"maintainer\:X86 ARCHITECTURE..." <x86@kernel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
Bharat Bhushan <Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>,
"open list\:LINUX FOR POWERPC..." <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list\:ABI\/API" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] KVM: define common __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW/HW_BP values
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:51:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871tjokrnu.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150413115535.GM6186@cbox>
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:08:00PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Currently x86, powerpc and soon arm64 use the same two architecture
>> specific bits for guest debug support for software and hardware
>> breakpoints. This makes the shared values explicit while leaving the
>> gate open for another architecture to use some other value if they
>> really really want to.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index ab4d473..1731569 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -310,8 +310,8 @@ struct kvm_guest_debug_arch {
>> * and upper 16 bits are architecture specific. Architecture specific defines
>> * that ioctl is for setting hardware breakpoint or software breakpoint.
>> */
>> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP 0x00010000
>> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP 0x00020000
>> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP
>> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP
>>
>> /* definition of registers in kvm_run */
>> struct kvm_sync_regs {
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index d7dcef5..1438202 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -250,8 +250,8 @@ struct kvm_debug_exit_arch {
>> __u64 dr7;
>> };
>>
>> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP 0x00010000
>> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP 0x00020000
>> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP
>> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP
>> #define KVM_GUESTDBG_INJECT_DB 0x00040000
>> #define KVM_GUESTDBG_INJECT_BP 0x00080000
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> index 5eedf84..ce2db14 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> @@ -525,8 +525,16 @@ struct kvm_s390_irq {
>>
>> /* for KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG */
>>
>> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE 0x00000001
>> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP 0x00000002
>> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE (1 << 0)
>> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP (1 << 1)
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Architecture specific stuff uses the top 16 bits of the field,
>
> can you be more specific than 'stuff' here? features?
>
>> + * however there is some shared commonality for the common cases
>
> I don't like this sentence; shared commonality is a pleonasm and the use
> of however makes it sounds like there's some caveat here.
OK I can see that - after I looked it up ;-)
> If the top 16 bits are indeed arhictecture specific, then I think they
> should just be defined in their architecture specific headers. Unless
> the idea here is that there's a fixed set of of flags that architectures
> can choose to support, in which case it should simply be defined in the
> common header.
Well an architecture might not support some features and want to use
those bits for something else? I didn't want to force the bottom two
of the architecture specific bits to wasted if the features don't exist.
>
>
>> + */
>> +#define __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP (1 << 16)
>> +#define __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP (1 << 17)
>> +
>>
>> struct kvm_guest_debug {
>> __u32 control;
>> --
>> 2.3.4
>>
--
Alex Bennée
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-13 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1427814488-28467-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
2015-03-31 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] KVM: add commentary for kvm_debug_exit_arch struct Alex Bennée
2015-04-01 15:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-04-10 12:58 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-13 10:57 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-03-31 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] KVM: define common __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW/HW_BP values Alex Bennée
2015-04-10 12:59 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-13 11:55 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-13 14:51 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2015-04-13 15:07 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-14 8:24 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-03-31 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] KVM: arm: guest debug, define API headers Alex Bennée
2015-04-01 15:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-04-01 16:01 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-01 16:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-04-01 16:09 ` Peter Maydell
2015-04-10 13:05 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-13 12:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-23 9:54 ` Alex Bennée
2015-03-31 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] KVM: arm: guest debug, add stub KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG ioctl Alex Bennée
2015-04-01 15:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-04-09 12:28 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-09 14:19 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-13 12:12 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-14 6:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-04-14 8:03 ` Alex Bennée
2015-03-31 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: arm: introduce kvm_arch_setup/clear_debug() Alex Bennée
2015-04-01 16:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-04-09 12:56 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-09 14:18 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-09 12:55 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-13 14:36 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-13 14:48 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-13 15:29 ` Alex Bennée
2015-03-31 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] KVM: arm64: guest debug, add SW break point support Alex Bennée
2015-04-02 12:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-04-02 14:06 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-10 13:09 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-14 8:25 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-23 14:26 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-27 20:04 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-27 21:57 ` Peter Maydell
2015-04-28 8:42 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-28 9:34 ` Peter Maydell
2015-04-28 12:56 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-28 14:37 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-29 8:10 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-29 9:18 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-29 10:38 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-29 15:08 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-29 19:20 ` Christoffer Dall
[not found] ` <CADt_bzh=zhSmoQnKxp5cUski3S=riYG5AnmCsm=qeTSjm=cprA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-04-22 9:46 ` Alex Bennée
2015-03-31 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: arm64: guest debug, add support for single-step Alex Bennée
2015-04-09 13:24 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-09 14:16 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-14 8:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-03-31 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] KVM: arm64: guest debug, HW assisted debug support Alex Bennée
2015-04-10 12:25 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-13 8:00 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-14 10:23 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-14 10:17 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-03-31 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: arm64: trap nested debug register access Alex Bennée
2015-04-10 12:38 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-13 7:59 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-14 10:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-14 10:30 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-03-31 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: arm64: add trace points for guest_debug debug Alex Bennée
2015-04-10 12:54 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-13 7:57 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-14 10:32 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871tjokrnu.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mihai.caraman@freescale.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=r65777@freescale.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhichao.huang@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox