From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932065AbbCZVj0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:39:26 -0400 Received: from smtp01.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.123]:49687 "EHLO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753244AbbCZVjY (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:39:24 -0400 X-ME-Helo: beldin X-ME-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:39:07 +0100 X-ME-IP: 109.222.244.195 From: Robert Jarzmik To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Lee Jones , Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Pitre , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Samuel Ortiz , Grant Likely , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: lubbock_cplds: add lubbock IO board References: <20150216130549.GF14545@x1> <1170550770.470129293.1424093248596.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net> <20150216162712.GR14545@x1> <87fva5a4i2.fsf@free.fr> <20150217074310.GT14545@x1> <20150218080719.GB5781@x1> <87a9088tam.fsf@free.fr> <20150325140725.GA11499@kroah.com> X-URL: http://belgarath.falguerolles.org/ Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:38:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20150325140725.GA11499@kroah.com> (Greg Kroah-Hartman's message of "Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:07:25 +0100") Message-ID: <871tkbxwup.fsf@free.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very nice, >> but it has to land somewhere, I don't want lubbock to remain broken. > > drivers/platform/arm ? Most certainly. I'll submit that to drivers/platform/arm/pxa, and maintain that pxa tree. As for drivers/platform/arm, do you want also maintainers to step up, or will you take the review/merge burden ? Cheers. -- Robert