From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: acme@ghostprotocols.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf sched: Introduce timehist command - v2
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:58:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871u1vptty.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385943795-11761-2-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> (David Ahern's message of "Sun, 1 Dec 2013 17:23:14 -0700")
On Sun, 1 Dec 2013 17:23:14 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> 'perf sched timehist' provides an analysis of scheduling events.
>
> Example usage:
> perf sched record -- sleep 1
> perf sched timehist
>
> By default it shows the individual schedule events, including the time between
> sched-in events for the task, the task scheduling delay (time between wakeup
> and actually running) and run time for the task:
>
> time cpu task name[tid/pid] b/n time sch delay run time
> ------------- ---- -------------------- --------- --------- ---------
> 79371.874569 [11] gcc[31949] 0.014 0.000 1.148
> 79371.874591 [10] gcc[31951] 0.000 0.000 0.024
> 79371.874603 [10] migration/10[59] 3.350 0.004 0.011
> 79371.874604 [11] <idle> 1.148 0.000 0.035
> 79371.874723 [05] <idle> 0.016 0.000 1.383
> 79371.874746 [05] gcc[31949] 0.153 0.078 0.022
> ...
>
> Times are in msec.usec.
Hmm.. I'm not sure this is right. It probably confuse users since
timehist_time_str() still uses "sec.usec" format and it looks not
natural for me to use "msec".
Yeah, I see perf stat uses "msec.usec" for result of clock events but
AFAICT it also shows the unit explicitly. And perf stat -I uses
"sec.nsec" format and perf script also uses "sec.usec" format so there's
a little consistency here.
I think this "msec.usec" format fits well for the scheduling events but
in general "sec.usec" format looks better IMHO.
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-02 0:23 [PATCH 0/2] perf: sched timehist command - v2 David Ahern
2013-12-02 0:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf sched: Introduce " David Ahern
2013-12-02 7:58 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2013-12-02 14:28 ` David Ahern
2013-12-02 9:33 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-12-02 14:33 ` David Ahern
2013-12-02 16:19 ` David Ahern
2013-12-02 0:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf sched: Add documentation for timehist options David Ahern
2013-12-02 6:07 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-12-02 12:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-02 7:41 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 14:37 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871u1vptty.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox