From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756726Ab3APMwI (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 07:52:08 -0500 Received: from LGEMRELSE6Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.121]:58004 "EHLO LGEMRELSE6Q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753602Ab3APMwG (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 07:52:06 -0500 X-AuditID: 9c930179-b7b54ae000000e44-47-50f6a274089d From: Namhyung Kim To: Alex Shi Cc: Morten Rasmussen , "mingo\@redhat.com" , "peterz\@infradead.org" , "tglx\@linutronix.de" , "akpm\@linux-foundation.org" , "arjan\@linux.intel.com" , "bp\@alien8.de" , "pjt\@google.com" , "efault\@gmx.de" , "vincent.guittot\@linaro.org" , "gregkh\@linuxfoundation.org" , "preeti\@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/22] sched: packing small tasks in wake/exec balancing References: <1357375071-11793-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <1357375071-11793-18-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <20130110171728.GG2046@e103034-lin> <50EF8B37.7050404@intel.com> <87pq18nsnk.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <50F644A9.3080509@intel.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:52:04 +0900 In-Reply-To: <50F644A9.3080509@intel.com> (Alex Shi's message of "Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:11:53 +0800") Message-ID: <871udlmgsr.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:11:53 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > On 01/14/2013 03:13 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:47:03 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: >>> Um, change to leader_cpu? >> >> vacantest? ;-) > > hard to the ward in google. are you sure it is better than leader_cpu? :) Nop. My English is just bad. :) But I'm not sure the "leader" is the right one. Why is it called "leader" in the first place? Thanks, Namhyung