From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753306Ab1AFSjH (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:39:07 -0500 Received: from na3sys009aog109.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.201]:60044 "EHLO na3sys009aog109.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753105Ab1AFSjF (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:39:05 -0500 From: Kevin Hilman To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Koen Kooi , Brad Parker , Anand Gadiyar , Ming Lei , Benoit Cousson , Stephen Rothwell , Paul Walmsley , Greg KH , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree Organization: Texas Instruments, Inc. References: <20101223171859.f6842045.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4D139517.3010608@ti.com> <4ce0f816f951f24ca3de9c84d9f70842@mail.gmail.com> <4D25E313.4060202@heeltoe.com> <8B3471BB-CB3F-4CE6-B523-D9C5E87B9CEC@dominion.thruhere.net> <87pqs9vqya.fsf@ti.com> <4D260812.3010605@ti.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:38:59 -0800 In-Reply-To: <4D260812.3010605@ti.com> (Nishanth Menon's message of "Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:21:06 -0600") Message-ID: <871v4pvpvg.fsf@ti.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nishanth Menon writes: > Kevin Hilman had written, on 01/06/2011 12:15 PM, the following: >> Koen Kooi writes: >> >>> Op 6 jan 2011, om 16:43 heeft Brad Parker het volgende geschreven: >>> >>>> It's probably expected, but I can't get the EHCI USB port to work >>>> on a beagle board XM (36xx) using the current omap tree. >>>> >>>> It this most likely due to these clock issues? >>> You need this patch: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/47807/ >>> >>> I'm currently too lazy to split it up like Nishant wants as I don't >>> see the point splitting for the sake of splitting.-- >> >> IMO, it doesn't need to be split up. >> >> But it does have to fix the other comments I made on the same thread[1] >> >> 1) add a descriptive changelog, and >> 2) Cc linux-arm-kernel > > Kevin, > there are four things being done in the patch: > a) fix GPIO number for EHCI power on > b) fix GPIO number for DVI reset line > c) switch on DVI > d) switch on Camera > > I have split the first 2 up. I just splitting the (c) up when I > noticed the code is confusing - I will reply in thread to the original > patch. > > I apologize, but I disagree - as far as I see it, these are separate > changes being done. Sure, but there are all tiny and isolated. For me, what's missing is just a changlog describing all the changes. Feel free to break it up if you prefer, but IMO it would be mergable as a single patch if there was a descriptive changelog actually mentioning all the changes made (as you just did above.) Kevin