From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263455AbVGATg5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:36:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263441AbVGATgl (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:36:41 -0400 Received: from smtp.andrew.cmu.edu ([128.2.10.83]:49551 "EHLO smtp.andrew.cmu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263440AbVGATfL (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:35:11 -0400 From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FUSE merging? References: <20050630222828.GA32357@janus> <20050701092444.GA4317@janus> <20050701120028.GB5218@janus> <20050701130510.GA5805@janus> <20050701152003.GA7073@janus> <20050701180415.GA7755@janus> X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:35:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050701180415.GA7755@janus> (Frank van Maarseveen's message of "Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:04:15 +0200") Message-ID: <871x6ijp5c.fsf@jbms.ath.cx> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Frank van Maarseveen writes: [snip] > But put otherwise: is there a compelling reason to permit FUSE mounts on > non-leaf nodes? In my own use of FUSE, I have found it handy to stick mount scripts in some of the directories that I use as FUSE mount points. -- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard