From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6413227FB21; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762367389; cv=none; b=IIhabTJ7Hkc3XeMT9oLihoT+k579QsBpW4QkwxH7TJjIKVaFL/Mi/vwuxot9VMmzgYxP3nXiRRtPB+j7GpYu3Mn7cpopZzJzKXf2QpioAHbraOI6m6fXY+NkQMpVyZItQMmnvHOLx7g/DHUQx1FSqEWTOfeUO5J8lo7PWbc5n+s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762367389; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OpM8Xif6DGVMY6CLUVbXdGI8wP3YtVjrHoBLxN1UFLI=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=F3mmJk/J67C4MYWfbheILFKPoYCfCYLL3VGfCmhhiJZ1+ZMJZ4kj/dGcI7TnHzW7nkODBhqORr2tjccKS9oAkigHYPSLfy05+wYOiE/Ne7nstcEYADNhTPmxRDLuyifNNXe4FWVhV8QeaD7AwYjNjd04Mg/85Xm8vZd05oPfrY4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=GceYcRrU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="GceYcRrU" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 92BE840C2F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1762367387; bh=S/TeqikExD8uWgrzEF36syodhjADFZ8CnsLO5vNjOM4=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=GceYcRrUTa49a0sjT9AyycZ6b5aAkOpizHyJRkJ6AlbymBs/zQT/p2dkc9+16yDAR mvsVMcYo5HnqHU5IGjuslddj+IxMAKaFUR6rXqKWMXUCuePuz09nMyu0FuA8tBvVBw dcxZvgRtnNbr3SPjyPGZh0/LeJsZUNepmsUCINqNxz1de1pBqx8jJ7TmDJIAp1NmK1 GyygWQhILFNhw0rlYKXWDsJpX8m9Cx5wSi9okJlF34o/GScshusnVA7azPRvFDbko/ 8rl+cqPw4K1RrUixPUzSsptkaPc4Hrj7lUDvtnKUZL3JECu9sGcmtn1fwj2qdgnSMb 5zROpPS87TGhA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92BE840C2F; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 18:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Jacob Keller , Randy Dunlap , Bagas Sanjaya , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Documentation Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: pldmfw: Demote library overview section In-Reply-To: <39096776-9b98-4e09-a008-d8d9620433dd@intel.com> References: <20251103030228.23851-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> <33ce66c4-d128-41d5-9e26-aabb7e80aa67@infradead.org> <39096776-9b98-4e09-a008-d8d9620433dd@intel.com> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 11:29:46 -0700 Message-ID: <87346s72p1.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jacob Keller writes: > On 11/2/2025 9:09 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> >> On 11/2/25 7:02 PM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >>> pldmfw library overview section is formatted as title heading (the >>> second title of index.rst), making it listed in driver-api toctree. >>> >>> Demote the section. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya >> >> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap >> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap >> >> Thanks. > > Acked-by: Jacob Keller > > libpldm doesn't have its own tree at present, and most updates typically > have gone through netdev. However, I think this makes the most sense to > be taken through docs tree, since it doesn't impact any code. OK I have applied it, thanks. jon