From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE62517BB21 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750439062; cv=none; b=gmiblXUPSgxKerqaNtF+2H5c+03UqiaFb7Kiq5FqE5K4R6qwzLdCkPwki2NXHNVePWpcqhSB/bGABxGqMR7cBJJbdOjgd7IgojtYstjA4xub4WSKD5RoVquFuv0kRnuV49RL3/xqdjDxUyJNy/Em7385SR4bnxf/wYs+FVN69hA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750439062; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5Bl2JfufO0kilZvR2+InuLVK8V/BBwppLn4v4RgxlZQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=L7nxAxf7TaYHZx3pfALspOxyl5yy4HWfz4YICN1l9fVwtgZT1tJ6KeeGvHZHlx9jtB4s+zun4Qx34oWzgE8Gm2yO/3wbWC3lT3hAs4dy0M143c6JBSQPy9f0tf0FpXZWMJUV2CnFxn+IszJYJnfQUwiIh4u7C7LFgiQfPJBt6ec= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=vy7LxSEJ; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=eZfOGm9T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="vy7LxSEJ"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="eZfOGm9T" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1750439057; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pZXazKZ81Fm88VrT+aVvxTAZu5b40oSlFcSyhlUiRbA=; b=vy7LxSEJVopfKvvQMVUGPPMsYKCz6ei3gQg3nSnu3NQB2iVTa+CmG0HPT5XQ7k5B5ZAKo8 t3dsKX7pub3oVPTr6vdbH8VfqT69IvqwcflitsZKX5pHsL2Usg0gQFxGcqyt41LhtL6qjc rcmBW6D6h4bip47TpyhAtZDmOuaHcDAGTG4mVsZhkScE5X+fAHiUzz5iHbad8HKT3AVPuz BBK7Jgt2r2uzY2kE8jn+/ltAuqU/6FuwltyoH2PMc8wRtIcKEEUYRKHWT8npxEFCb2BS5I xGvob6YKj1pKT/WhgdZmYoWTO5Tv8MyTBPRDNwpRx61s/Hi5jwW1CSEbiwAQGg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1750439057; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pZXazKZ81Fm88VrT+aVvxTAZu5b40oSlFcSyhlUiRbA=; b=eZfOGm9TUs+KViOzIKW6MMD+b9lBu93S6bh7rJGQyplVg2WwP/C8MymYJiXW1+liviMjM8 4woUS5KYYMxbv2Aw== To: Gabriele Monaco , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anna-Maria Behnsen , Frederic Weisbecker , Waiman Long Cc: Gabriele Monaco Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] timers: Rename tmigr 'online' bit to 'available' In-Reply-To: <20250530142031.215594-2-gmonaco@redhat.com> References: <20250530142031.215594-1-gmonaco@redhat.com> <20250530142031.215594-2-gmonaco@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 19:04:16 +0200 Message-ID: <8734buqr8v.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, May 30 2025 at 16:20, Gabriele Monaco wrote: > > -static int tmigr_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu) > +static int tmigr_cpu_unavailable(unsigned int cpu) tmigr_clear_cpu_available() and tmigr_set_cpu_available() are way more clear function names because they explicitly state the action. cpu_offline/online are not entirely clear either but at least offline/online can be used as verbs, while [un]available definitely cannot. Thanks, tglx