From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 116B815CB for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723745429; cv=none; b=aYQR62vCqdWd8cphzIYMx2Lco0by5VGdFM1zOkyJBiGzOJkiZ3HSmWoKhXFpginOvmR8OXMkL4mxe5hraFrHRHnpVvzhB68IKNK93EDThLe824PIwa+Hx/PbTR1TzXyk+zi2LOeFCHGhmWbbPwk4sMR2R8Yodffe3H7v3uwaDh4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723745429; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ln08iy0xj4KLwN0u16OE6nU1+VzGo+CUqWdXxb2EaOg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=liWedHGXUH2at6k00ShqpBKrt5xsyFy/T/55WsIOa2J/1olz71p2BpDOY/oOkZ8DvlwH/UZ7XuVRGm/PUhcMBaM9H8n9U6ZPfw97/ZZp2qAEcZiIlWsUvngKPF+zqWvUJgJ9sRRUm0pNtn3m7LoNs7ppBDRlSblVf4vLw8EQzis= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=YJGog9Na; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Pz9qjuQU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="YJGog9Na"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Pz9qjuQU" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1723745426; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aIcN+dIpsXv32UGdjkrhLz6191NfIjPhsUje1gE84Ek=; b=YJGog9NahT5FBJYT42XzusFUmigYmnDfd+JLK0/zYmUsEGcqIJW+41DEd4KzKkCmff4+rO 5vVQ1dELVh4U/zx3KO2t8XEuUI67pTEg9DCfaEODuKkSo/vpjrX3nbpfFeFS1sVR+gVC46 3M/wd89TS2e9kVk4j/qZOUi9Mf8RdhSYbdre6evbVFfj2+69PBAk0w3Y6PmiszOgQI1r6r yisI8NXFi1v9PSSpgOfG0rYUgbC0sg6jDlnjcYeyO26cUUaIfC9pqAr180iHr46d+GCogZ PVspcb4B5A2GWMaHHgC92UBBi1fYOtkGt8HPXXXJ25FaFWntURDc9MP7KLd4wA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1723745426; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aIcN+dIpsXv32UGdjkrhLz6191NfIjPhsUje1gE84Ek=; b=Pz9qjuQUyR8OhF/TBmmZiUXsC7RCoLOjJO846L4GaTFJPylLrqwjnO/HyVujGQl/laZYwe L6dRlDcMQbQ8sUBg== To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Renner Berthing , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, apatel@ventanamicro.com, Paul Walmsley , samuel.holland@sifive.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] Fix Allwinner D1 boot regression In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 20:10:25 +0200 Message-ID: <8734n5mzce.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, Aug 15 2024 at 10:51, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:30:48 PDT (-0700), tglx@linutronix.de wrote: >> I'm very much inclined to take the reverts right now, send them to Linus >> for -rc5 tagged with cc: stable and ignore/nak any irqchip related riscv >> patches until the next merge window is over. > > Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt > > if you want to take the revert. I'm happy to wait a week and see whether someone gets that CLINT hack working or as I suggested the D1 PLIC early probe quirk. > IIUC the patch above doesn't actually fix it, that's what led to just > sending the reverts -- at least reverts are better than breaking users. > I'll post over there too... Right. We figured that out by now :) > And it's no big deal if we're in the doghouse for a bit. Regressions > should get fixed faster than this, so we deserve it. For a week I consider you probationers :) > Probably also another sign we're way too focused on getting new features > merged, as that's coming at the expense of making existing platforms > work. IMO we've been way too focused on getting support for specs that > don't even have implementations, and not enough on building real working > systems. RISCV is not alone with that. This whole industry is nuts about features and forgets the stuff what matters. Thanks, tglx