From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E9ED1635DD for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714152195; cv=none; b=D+XIhMIzC21VEcVBma5/auQGRj/SRONRJSHjOYKEB9LjbQfzHKxaXCmN/4XgtVSueAhMGj0ZxDQ/RV34kexusVOzI/dW/Z5/9lmMz0DOymdM0h8YwWCQcbXCp3XhoavZvB6gE0lKNDbCg4txpJWDcc36mgsg/+gNz8h3+Zfho70= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714152195; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8c14yDAPeO5YUURLeNl2uwUPQd2O+PB2Dd7K4zo3CIk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mZQIxrTCV8zrv4KeABHngP6gAJEP8iA29IYINXafBxFiu81JYH0jBMdLm8QjEjUO8a1Lu7mwala8pD4liIyqajX6I44DiswImB6SgZg7whMYKcUOIaOI9ysHA6KaMblKlMe9rAIkgpnbVmP3y9GsskQeFHD2e3Ut3uDEetA3Nko= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=fqf2dZBV; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=gMdtoM3w; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="fqf2dZBV"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="gMdtoM3w" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1714152185; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Phh2SQgb1fDjrQMMKRxrCqZZm1HdbdAFSSyGdV9+ugA=; b=fqf2dZBVlGkKUbdpZcudTUm0uT1c1sMhmWzvD/QNDKLEDyIwgBtrTpKV1lwZI/YY2nR3CY c/x3uaE4VnMCTLR7+Xe6ujJN86J9gaSFaAP0T2kQfKnODpGOZwu50T2fWfT6G/YyDdLWLI 5M689pfHpDsC7o0ZMj7WHfeXALLR7NBXytpN4uE4tT/Jmp81Rntq1baUJkpPDrU1MtBbME Ud7MrNHSBEBVQemvwbwTXuwzNOM60PWEZnj+yNd6OGaux+PUZVNIpZiF1ZDnfReqHcFeOm APuYvUeBTiEVmxNJGn91j/HPf2geAduKl9OJYLrjIF6DdE5F2jzzi9PB4+OB+w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1714152185; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Phh2SQgb1fDjrQMMKRxrCqZZm1HdbdAFSSyGdV9+ugA=; b=gMdtoM3wBIlQpsXyJoq2ixOBd+w1J5liSuqrNWF1n+43jaL3sfpG6Xia2mYierh5gkafjH 1rxMnsBoofjEodCw== To: Z qiang , paulmck@kernel.org Cc: syzbot , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [syzbot] [kernel?] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in __do_softirq In-Reply-To: References: <8f281a10-b85a-4586-9586-5bbc12dc784f@paulmck-laptop> <4c09abb6-4f6e-42d7-9944-c5da995649cb@paulmck-laptop> <87o7a1umj3.ffs@tglx> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:23:04 +0200 Message-ID: <8734r8t4w7.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, Apr 26 2024 at 10:09, Z qiang wrote: >> This looks quite nice to me, especially given that it avoids changing >> all the other calls to __do_softirq(). Some architectures might want >> to directly call handle_softirqs(), but if so, they can send the patches. > > > Can you send an official patch? or I will send and add you to > Co-developed-by tags. Just send it along with a nice changelog and add: Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner That's good enough.