From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6646451001 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706189446; cv=none; b=RSu6nkZrSIWweFsA50LbkKW3Zc+Zco1mIqVwffPckdJfxGJvreGtYDRVaX24ACXD+Q/pQMPyp+Zf2gTewwbKQPcP/OULNi/N7B0H04t7GGAOz/1Sypp+KYb/bqMJBJzmaYMRzvBKIbCxAJAVYxFkbMZq41OZSooAV7x2xXOByPc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706189446; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h/uU8eQoI7TkoVtv+orv7Gfc3jLYH0IXZ5VfTnexG5M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mQwY0jtcnvB2YiV4wvvjKWb1ir3Y/LUOYGBzlfk9wvrSjfBac5cLH6/bXo0bpINxMHUtevofm34p+6dJG1aZtGjnfmE2lpQen0XPVsADzE2yH0NuJkTQD7BfFJhVtfh94n/W4l0+8EEuZFgN6cAWntf0/V3gCTuaaQbSMucowEU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=k1OLbGSp; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=19zO674G; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="k1OLbGSp"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="19zO674G" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1706189442; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5kdSSfYvADGdKw5gjzcDDROwT0/gGqPhOncxQDSRibs=; b=k1OLbGSpKX+/4+ZtQfB9dula0aX82Ze9+njKeLbZ8g0cldKYs16BrCLcaBUfxiUZoWCW5p RsvG1OZI9S8uejqqU+0lOG60ymdkPE92R3SorJLDaa9Mc1oTDUqY1NrMmgHd8Zlvon6R91 /wOCrkS9AHRc5005Xe3W05/arK6o2+0K0l4be3OkT/1rxwsn39Q1RP8bRU+cibWrxRd6bJ WdZFrb8yPEvNUd1wDROEDBaevUuUPC1QRy6oFOG/SicbXt9qKNlkyNCbUTCZX7Qgw4VdhU vXsZyfh3XAS1P9rfvjroQ25yvW3M8ECa9tZUj2TdvyVgqCAxmDuQmm1DpfHgYQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1706189442; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5kdSSfYvADGdKw5gjzcDDROwT0/gGqPhOncxQDSRibs=; b=19zO674GUTmD1nE1l1xdSNd8U7B/A5i6PnKuiH9aCOGIGaCXV7uzhbpDQlVHJHTfW48KTa yQh/8GUnNcrOGKCg== To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: LKML , Peng Liu , Ingo Molnar , Anna-Maria Behnsen , Joel Fernandes Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] tick/nohz: Remove duplicate between lowres and highres handlers In-Reply-To: References: <20240124170459.24850-1-frederic@kernel.org> <20240124170459.24850-3-frederic@kernel.org> <87ede5kbc6.ffs@tglx> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:30:41 +0100 Message-ID: <8734ulilq6.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, Jan 25 2024 at 12:58, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:32:09AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 24 2024 at 18:04, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >> > +/* >> > + * We rearm the timer until we get disabled by the idle code. >> > + * Called with interrupts disabled. >> > + */ >> > +static enum hrtimer_restart tick_nohz_highres_handler(struct hrtimer *timer) >> >> Isn't that a misnomer now? > > Would tick_nohz_hrtimer_handler() make more sense then? Because it's clearly > an hrtimer handler, just emulated in low-res mode. Kinda. tick_nohz_handler() would be sufficient too.