From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46F1C1C686 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706175229; cv=none; b=fQvsIWUZqlTMjtsPuT85NnCJbR+2NhGg3kjlE5xpk//mSDImm2Tkn0Kg7F4O3KdWoWx3ANf8ZhCnJTjNKf04pozjIkY/JPJM28vl1Rz1aoPNufowNkz9Ry9WcTihAgZ5NzZ5HeWf874U0vBLs90vJGRw7UbAIAiXd1O8eXlj24I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706175229; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yo0rhXWM9QETEM2P5yv6ibPUP/SlSUa5WyJ9O8BKEGo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SzKjmgtD+/lEpjZKyUsWJnKyCT2tnZHF6HjgbEWtdv7QIEdAZpL81YAoX3FH/PJz08KicGqBilKJkfHi9I2A0KSstQaQyB3C2OytcMSxtDla9nGPY+h5YNV4aMpM5AVzygSymmnTjdNbeK56Jhhgrkb92zNMV/80p6ywvxzyw+8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=xmSUjE9T; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Yb6fLBhx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="xmSUjE9T"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Yb6fLBhx" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1706175226; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yo0rhXWM9QETEM2P5yv6ibPUP/SlSUa5WyJ9O8BKEGo=; b=xmSUjE9THglvVIBgewP8zvNHcCFT1gK4C45oaE61+9tTUtyAOxBjO3+Wc/dBe0FUpzoXZJ 5BcCKHGwp0UzMWM7Ua9PdGueJGuXiMbHqKoJ4L0n/WUW+vdZXSp9HQ0S4SFPOEWdWxt4sA lVhJ328bzvDzliCR6QyDPNE0Fy7R8TIzIUnKPq+ZY8rQrpjs+kWfzD8qh9KkP47beBVHSm 2XVv08aNYdPPunOLEefGD4Q3i6Zv7JZEuFtwcZ+jmgaq41SdtawqKRc9BrtUQ9stIr6iS7 51ehE3xhKMcw/N1fD1bq3/K0Vo58w6/kp6ZBGI6Lah79kdi5Ra81gYdn0ChZEg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1706175226; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yo0rhXWM9QETEM2P5yv6ibPUP/SlSUa5WyJ9O8BKEGo=; b=Yb6fLBhxUqFSnnzEL7nsWuLrmCIVN3dSxhWKQB+Fr70bfZ/cCwVsHV1dkCcttMsXUGLNiR WmcxppEvf5o7cICA== To: Frederic Weisbecker , LKML Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Anna-Maria Behnsen , Peng Liu , Joel Fernandes Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] tick: No need to clear ts->next_tick again In-Reply-To: <20240124170459.24850-7-frederic@kernel.org> References: <20240124170459.24850-1-frederic@kernel.org> <20240124170459.24850-7-frederic@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:33:46 +0100 Message-ID: <8734ulkb9h.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Jan 24 2024 at 18:04, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > The tick sched structure is already cleared from > tick_cancel_sched_timer(), so there is no need to clear that field > again. > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner