From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_* macros
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 12:01:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735992hyi.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <339505f3-9005-df0b-3c73-b54320568db2@suse.de>
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 20.12.22 um 21:16 schrieb Siddh Raman Pant:
>> This patchset aims to remove usages of deprecated DRM_* macros from the
>> files residing in drivers/gpu/drm root.
>>
>> In process, I found out that NULL as first argument of drm_dbg_* wasn't
>> working, but it was listed as the alternative in deprecation comment,
>> so I fixed that before removing usages of DRM_DEBUG_* macros.
>>
>> This patchset should be applied in order as changes might be dependent.
>>
>> Please review and let me know if any errors are there, and hopefully
>> this gets accepted.
>
> Thanks for the patchset. Overall this looks fine.
>
> But the use of pr_() functions is not optimal in my opinion. I know that
> I recommended using it, but at a closer look, I think we might want to
> reconsider that. I wouldn't like losing the '[drm]' tag, but adding them
> to each pr_() call isn't a good idea either.
>
> I think it would be nicer to replace DRM_INFO with drm_info(NULL, ).
> Depending on the device being NULL, the helpers would select dev-based
> messages or printk-based messages. It would then work like drm_dbg_().
> But it needs some additional changes.
>
> Can you first move all pr_() related changes into a new patchset? The
> trivial conversion were the device is known and not NULL can remain in
> this patchset and be merged soon. We can afterwards have a separate
> discussion for the changes that currently involve pr_().
Same thoughts, agreed.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>>
>> Siddh Raman Pant (10):
>> drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_INFO
>> drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_NOTE
>> drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_ERROR
>> drm/print: Fix support for NULL as first argument of drm_dbg_*
>> drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_DEBUG
>> drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER
>> drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_DEBUG_KMS
>> drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_DEBUG_PRIME
>> drm/drm_blend: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC
>> drm/drm_lease: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_DEBUG_LEASE
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_agpsupport.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.c | 13 ++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 8 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c | 122 ++++++++++++------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c | 118 +++++++++++++----------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_color_mgmt.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 28 +++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c | 18 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 36 ++++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c | 62 ++++++------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c | 8 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_displayid.c | 6 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dma.c | 10 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 28 +++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 17 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 18 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_flip_work.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c | 3 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 7 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_dma_helper.c | 6 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c | 6 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hashtab.c | 10 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioc32.c | 13 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 24 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_kms_helper_common.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c | 68 ++++++-------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_legacy_misc.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c | 36 +++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dbi.c | 19 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c | 8 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c | 6 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 10 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_helper.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c | 14 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c | 46 ++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c | 39 ++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_scatter.c | 19 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c | 22 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c | 45 +++++----
>> include/drm/drm_print.h | 91 ++++++++++++++----
>> 44 files changed, 549 insertions(+), 465 deletions(-)
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-21 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-20 20:16 [PATCH 00/10] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_* macros Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-20 20:16 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_INFO Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-21 9:49 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-21 10:02 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-12-20 20:16 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_NOTE Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-20 20:16 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_ERROR Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-20 20:16 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/print: Fix support for NULL as first argument of drm_dbg_* Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-21 9:08 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-12-21 15:38 ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-21 9:41 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-21 15:35 ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-20 20:16 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_DEBUG Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-21 5:53 ` kernel test robot
2022-12-21 12:06 ` kernel test robot
2022-12-20 20:16 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-21 10:00 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-21 10:13 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-12-23 17:54 ` jim.cromie
2022-12-20 20:16 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_DEBUG_KMS Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-21 11:56 ` kernel test robot
2022-12-20 20:16 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_DEBUG_PRIME Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-20 20:16 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/drm_blend: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-22 9:46 ` Simon Ser
2022-12-20 20:16 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/drm_lease: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_DEBUG_LEASE Siddh Raman Pant
2022-12-21 10:53 ` Simon Ser
2022-12-21 9:16 ` [PATCH 00/10] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_* macros Thomas Zimmermann
2022-12-21 10:01 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-12-21 15:57 ` Siddh Raman Pant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8735992hyi.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=code@siddh.me \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox