[tip:x86/hyperv] x86/hyper-v: Use cheaper HVCALL_SEND_IPI hypercall when possible

tip-bot for Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-07-03T07:05:11Z

Commit-ID: 4bd06060762bc7e4834ecf9daeb78834f7a29582
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4bd06060762bc7e4834ecf9daeb78834f7a29582
Author: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 19:06:24 +0200
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:00:34 +0200

x86/hyper-v: Use cheaper HVCALL_SEND_IPI hypercall when possible

When there is no need to send an IPI to a CPU with VP number > 64
we can do the job with fast HVCALL_SEND_IPI hypercall.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180622170625.30688-4-vkuznets@redhat.com

---
arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
index 90055f89223b..ee962784d25b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
@@ -99,6 +99,9 @@ static bool __send_ipi_mask_ex(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
int nr_bank = 0;
int ret = 1;

+ if (!(ms_hyperv.hints & HV_X64_EX_PROCESSOR_MASKS_RECOMMENDED))
+ return false;
+
local_irq_save(flags);
arg = (struct ipi_arg_ex **)this_cpu_ptr(hyperv_pcpu_input_arg);

@@ -140,8 +143,18 @@ static bool __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
if ((vector < HV_IPI_LOW_VECTOR) || (vector > HV_IPI_HIGH_VECTOR))
return false;

- if ((ms_hyperv.hints & HV_X64_EX_PROCESSOR_MASKS_RECOMMENDED))
- return __send_ipi_mask_ex(mask, vector);
+ /*
+ * From the supplied CPU set we need to figure out if we can get away
+ * with cheaper HVCALL_SEND_IPI hypercall. This is possible when the
+ * highest VP number in the set is < 64. As VP numbers are usually in
+ * ascending order and match Linux CPU ids, here is an optimization:
+ * we check the VP number for the highest bit in the supplied set first
+ * so we can quickly find out if using HVCALL_SEND_IPI_EX hypercall is
+ * a must. We will also check all VP numbers when walking the supplied
+ * CPU set to remain correct in all cases.
+ */
+ if (hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(cpumask_last(mask)) >= 64)
+ goto do_ex_hypercall;

ipi_arg.vector = vector;
ipi_arg.cpu_mask = 0;
@@ -153,16 +166,17 @@ static bool __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
* only target upto 64 CPUs.
*/
if (vcpu >= 64)
- goto ipi_mask_done;
+ goto do_ex_hypercall;

__set_bit(vcpu, (unsigned long *)&ipi_arg.cpu_mask);
}

ret = hv_do_fast_hypercall16(HVCALL_SEND_IPI, ipi_arg.vector,
ipi_arg.cpu_mask);
-
-ipi_mask_done:
return ((ret == 0) ? true : false);
+
+do_ex_hypercall:
+ return __send_ipi_mask_ex(mask, vector);
}

static bool __send_ipi_one(int cpu, int vector)
@@ -218,10 +232,7 @@ static void hv_send_ipi_self(int vector)
void __init hv_apic_init(void)
{
if (ms_hyperv.hints & HV_X64_CLUSTER_IPI_RECOMMENDED) {
- if ((ms_hyperv.hints & HV_X64_EX_PROCESSOR_MASKS_RECOMMENDED))
- pr_info("Hyper-V: Using ext hypercalls for IPI\n");
- else
- pr_info("Hyper-V: Using IPI hypercalls\n");
+ pr_info("Hyper-V: Using IPI hypercalls\n");
/*
* Set the IPI entry points.
*/