From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@oracle.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add support for in-line nested struct comments
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:05:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87371xb8gb.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180218170334.711d50e2@lwn.net>
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:48:14 -0200
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> wrote:
>
>> his series fix two bugs at kernel-doc.rst examples and add support
>> for in-line nested struct comments.
>>
>> It also converts one documentation at intel_dpio_phy to use it,
>> in order to give a practical example about how to use it.
>
> OK, I've applied everything but the last patch, which I assume will go
> through the DRM tree.
I was going to reference the kernel-doc commit while applying patch 6,
but I can't find the others. I guess applied literally meant just
applied, not pushed... ;)
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-19 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-16 13:48 [PATCH 0/6] Add support for in-line nested struct comments Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-02-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] doc-guide: kernel-doc: fix example for nested_foobar struct Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-02-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] doc-guide: kernel-doc: fix example for inlined comments Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-02-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] doc-guide: kernel-doc: move in-line section to be after nested struct Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-02-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] scripts: kernel-doc: support in-line comments on nested structs/unions Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-02-16 14:52 ` Markus Heiser
2018-02-16 14:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-02-16 16:11 ` Markus Heiser
2018-02-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] doc-guide: kernel-doc: add examples about nested union/structs Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-02-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm: intel_dpio_phy: fix kernel-doc comments at nested struct Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-02-19 0:03 ` [PATCH 0/6] Add support for in-line nested struct comments Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-19 10:05 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2018-02-19 15:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87371xb8gb.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=mchehab@s-opensource.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=tom.saeger@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox