From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] perf tools: Account entry stats when it's added to the output tree
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:14:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8738h4sk30.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140422171048.GL1104@krava.brq.redhat.com> (Jiri Olsa's message of "Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:10:49 +0200")
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:10:49 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 05:49:45PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.c b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
>> index 1c77714f668d..f955ae5a41c5 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
>> @@ -344,9 +344,11 @@ void hists__inc_nr_entries(struct hists *hists, struct hist_entry *h)
>> hists__calc_col_len(hists, h);
>> hists->nr_non_filtered_entries++;
>> hists->stats.total_non_filtered_period += h->stat.period;
>> + hists->stats.nr_non_filtered_samples += h->stat.nr_events;
>> }
>> hists->nr_entries++;
>> hists->stats.total_period += h->stat.period;
>> + hists__add_nr_events(hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE, h->stat.nr_events);
>
> while at it.. could hists__remove_entry_filter call hists__inc_nr_entries too?
Nope, I (and Arnaldo) want to the default stats invariant - they are not
changed by any filter. As you can see hists__remove_entry_filter() only
updates non-filtered stats.
>
> not sure about those 2 extra lines in hists__remove_entry_filter:
>
> if (h->ms.unfolded)
> hists->nr_non_filtered_entries += h->nr_rows;
> h->row_offset = 0;
>
> maybe they should be added into hists__inc_nr_entries?
Hmm.. this seems like a mix of generic code and UI-specific code. The
->nr_rows, ->row_offset and ->ms.unfolded are only used by TUI browser
code AFAIK and it takes the folding state into account.
I think we should just make it folded to make things simple - and
finally get rid of the UI-specific bits in the generic code.
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-23 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-22 8:49 [PATCHSET 0/9] perf tools: Fixup for the --percentage change Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 8:49 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf report: Count number of entries and samples separately Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 14:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-04-23 4:52 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 16:43 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-04-22 8:49 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf hists: Introduce hists__add_nr_events() Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 14:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-04-23 4:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 8:49 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf tools: Account entry stats when it's added to the output tree Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 14:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-04-23 4:58 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 17:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-04-23 5:14 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2014-04-22 8:49 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf tools: Introduce hists__inc_dump_events() Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 16:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-04-23 5:58 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 8:49 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf hists: Add missing update on nr_non_filtered_entries Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 8:49 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf ui/tui: Fix off-by-one in hist_browser__update_nr_entries() Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 8:49 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf ui/tui: Rename hist_browser__update_nr_entries() Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 8:49 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf top/tui: Update nr_entries properly after a filter is applied Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 8:49 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf hists/tui: Count callchain rows separately Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 17:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-04-22 9:55 ` [PATCHSET 0/9] perf tools: Fixup for the --percentage change Ingo Molnar
2014-04-23 4:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-04-23 6:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-25 7:53 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8738h4sk30.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox