From: Douglas McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
amanda-hackers@amanda.org, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
ck@vds.kolivas.org
Subject: Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:51:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <873b4alj52.fsf@suzuka.mcnaught.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703120604.42776.gene.heskett@gmail.com> (Gene Heskett's message of "Mon, 12 Mar 2007 06:04:42 -0400")
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com> writes:
> If, and I have previously, I revert to a 2.6.20-ck1 patching, this does
> not occur. So my contention is that someplace in this recent progression
> from 2.6.20 to 2.6.21-rc3, there is a patch which acts to change how
> c-time is being reported to tar. Or there is a spillage into c-times
> when tar does its estimate scans where the output goes to /dev/null.
> Or possibly even this version of tar is doing it differently. I just
> looked up how to get the c-times out of ls, and they, as far as ls is
> concerned, look sane. But tars actions while running a 2.6.21-rcX kernel
> certainly are not. I do have a plain -rc2 I can try, so that will be the
> next test. If that also fails in this manner, I'll build a later
> 2.6.20-2 or whatever to verify that it doesn't so suffer.
You may find 'strace' useful to track down this sort of thing (though
the output can be voluminous).
-Doug
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-12 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-11 1:35 RSDL-mm 0.28 Matt Mackall
2007-03-11 2:28 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 3:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-11 3:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-11 3:59 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 3:39 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-11 3:44 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 4:01 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-11 4:03 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-11 6:19 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 5:38 ` RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29 Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 5:48 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 6:37 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 10:04 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 12:51 ` Douglas McNaught [this message]
2007-03-12 18:28 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 18:46 ` Douglas McNaught
2007-03-12 19:10 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 19:14 ` Lee Revell
2007-03-12 19:43 ` Douglas McNaught
2007-03-12 19:54 ` Patrick Mau
2007-03-12 20:24 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-13 1:32 ` Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29) Douglas McNaught
2007-03-13 2:39 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-13 3:01 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-03-13 4:04 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-13 4:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-13 5:48 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 13:22 ` RSDL-mm 0.28 David Schwartz
2007-03-12 14:54 ` Ray Lee
2007-03-13 7:22 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-11 7:32 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=873b4alj52.fsf@suzuka.mcnaught.org \
--to=doug@mcnaught.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amanda-hackers@amanda.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox