From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
bigeasy@linutronix.de, clrkwllms@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
nadav.amit@gmail.com, vkuznets@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/14] smp: Refactor remote CPU selection in smp_call_function_any()
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:49:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874iipjtsp.ffs@fw13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616111127.966468-4-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
On Tue, Jun 16 2026 at 19:11, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
> Currently, smp_call_function_any() disables preemption across the entire
> process of picking a target CPU, enqueueing the IPI, and synchronously
> waiting for the remote CPU. Since smp_call_function_single() has already
> been optimized to re-enable preemption before the synchronous
> csd_lock_wait(), callers of smp_call_function_any() should also benefit
> from this optimization to reduce the preemption-disabled critical section.
>
> A naive approach would be to simply remove get_cpu() and put_cpu() from
> smp_call_function_any(), leaving the preemption disablement entirely to
> smp_call_function_single(). However, doing so opens a dangerous
> preemption window between picking the remote CPU (e.g., via
> sched_numa_find_nth_cpu()) and dispatching the IPI inside
> smp_call_function_single(). If the selected remote CPU is fully offlined
> during this window, smp_call_function_single() will fail its
> cpu_online() check and return -ENXIO directly to the caller, violating
> the guarantee to execute on *any* online CPU in the mask.
>
> To safely enable this optimization, this patch refactors the logic of
s/this patch//
> smp_call_function_any() and smp_call_function_single(). By moving the
> random remote CPU selection into a common __smp_call_function_single(),
> and keep the entire selection and IPI dispatch process within a single
> preemption-disabled region.
This is actually a nice comprehensible change log.
> +static int __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func,
> + void *info, const struct cpumask *mask, int wait)
Please align the second row argument with the first argument of the row
above. See Documentation. And while at it please make 'wait' bool
because it _is_ a boolean flag.
> +
> +/**
> + * smp_call_function_single - Run a function on a specific CPU
> + * @cpu: Specific target CPU for this function.
> + * @func: The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking.
> + * @info: An arbitrary pointer to pass to the function.
> + * @wait: If true, wait until function has completed on other CPUs.
While at it please align the argument descriptors tabular. This zigzag
is harder too read. See documentation.
> + *
> + * Returns: %0 on success, else a negative status code.
> + */
> +int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
> + int wait)
bool wait and no line break required.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 11:11 [PATCH v8 00/14] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 01/14] smp: Disable preemption explicitly in __csd_lock_wait() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-26 13:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 02/14] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_single() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-26 13:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 03/14] smp: Refactor remote CPU selection in smp_call_function_any() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-26 13:49 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 04/14] smp: Use task-local IPI cpumask in smp_call_function_many_cond() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-26 14:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-26 15:47 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-26 16:07 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-26 19:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-27 0:52 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 05/14] smp: Alloc percpu csd data in smpcfd_prepare_cpu() only once Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-26 14:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 06/14] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_many_cond() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-26 14:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 07/14] smp: Remove preempt_disable() from smp_call_function() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-26 14:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 08/14] smp: Remove preempt_disable() from on_each_cpu_cond_mask() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 09/14] scftorture: Remove preempt_disable() in scftorture_invoke_one() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-26 14:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 10/14] x86/mm: Factor out flush_tlb_info initialization Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-16 13:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 11/14] x86/mm: Cap flush_tlb_info alignment at 64 bytes Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-16 13:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-16 15:36 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-26 14:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 12/14] x86/mm: Move flush_tlb_info back to the stack Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-26 14:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 13/14] x86/kvm: Disable preemption in kvm_flush_tlb_multi() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-16 13:46 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 14/14] x86/mm: Re-enable preemption before flush_tlb_multi() Chuyi Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874iipjtsp.ffs@fw13 \
--to=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=zhouchuyi@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox