From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, harisokn@amazon.com, cl@gentwo.org,
rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, memxor@gmail.com,
zhenglifeng1@huawei.com, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com,
rdunlap@infradead.org, david.laight.linux@gmail.com,
broonie@kernel.org, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
ashok.bhat@arm.com, ankur.a.arora@oracle.com, ast@kernel.org,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, clm@meta.com,
ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 02/15] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 23:32:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ija7vo3.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23edac0734ee3ef334237165500d8f34e3c649081db7b3140a4a8596a202f339@mail.kernel.org>
bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org writes:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index fe60738e5943..fa676428ec3f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -1606,6 +1606,9 @@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP
>> config ARCH_DEFAULT_CRASH_DUMP
>> def_bool y
>>
>> +config ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX
>> + def_bool y
>> +
>
> ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX isn't private to the barrier code. Before this it was
> defined only by arch/x86, and the generic kernel already keys cpuidle
> behavior off it in two places that arm64 builds.
>
> In drivers/cpuidle/Makefile:
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX) += poll_state.o
>
> and in drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:
>
> #define ACPI_IDLE_STATE_START (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX) ? 1 : 0)
> ...
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX)) {
> cpuidle_poll_state_init(drv);
> count = 1;
> }
>
> On arm64, ACPI_PROCESSOR is "default y" and depends on ARM64, and it
> selects ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE which selects CPU_IDLE. So on an ACPI arm64
> system this now builds poll_state.o and makes acpi_processor_setup_cstates()
> register a POLL idle state as C-state index 0, shifting the firmware
> C-states up by one.
Yes, this is a bug. The additional POLL idle state change wasn't intended
to be registered as part of this patch.
With this change the first c-state will end up executing a NOP poll_idle()
since current_set_polling_and_test() is tif_need_resched() when
TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is not defined but this does unnecessarily register
the additional c-state.
I missed that in my testing because my test machine has LPI states which
need an explicit change to enable this.
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250218213337.377987-7-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com/)
Ankur
> The commit message describes this symbol only as indicating "an optimized
> implementation of cpu_poll_relax()", and the generic patch describes it as
> "a cpu_poll_relax() implementation that is expected to be cheaper". Neither
> mentions the cpuidle/ACPI poll_state side effect.
>
>
> Is enabling the cpuidle polling idle state on arm64 intended here, or is
> ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX only meant to feed smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()? If
> the latter, would a dedicated symbol (or decoupling poll_state/ACPI from
> ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX) avoid the unintended idle-path change?
>
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
>
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/27125050324
--
ankur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 8:04 [PATCH v12 00/15] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 01/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 02/15] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-10 6:32 ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 03/15] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 04/15] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 05/15] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 06/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 07/15] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 08/15] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 09/15] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 10/15] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 9:04 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 11/15] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 12/15] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 13/15] arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 14/15] barrier: add tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 15/15] barrier: add clock tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-10 6:44 ` [PATCH v12 00/15] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874ija7vo3.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashok.bhat@arm.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox