From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DCAF20E70A; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 23:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740439410; cv=none; b=Sp8zB4SXQ0lytwlpMVJL/ieA0ZMYKstlM0K8D5rOz6pYS16t3Yym/SlufXkok9hiCJkghT0AjgJsS/tFTeeDh9xUCggHkp34OMf2RKHwC97pcXfuFsj4KvO4HeCqNu/d7BuE+nctRbUQ4NGBNAwv8r4uaLSjAMGIB5C3+hTWkpo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740439410; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xygo3kUZTNGVK5pB6Ij39BzUiIbzZnVa8VVlNDIgOYw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IsItUoXdb4PSztpDiep0HS+R380y9ds9kqUgOFHKWCcgIlGqKx07g7InAmX/eXdywIDWyuYO6M+9frH0acnNN1e0jzEHzX7TCsN9DdmU61r53qKkVNxKRgPSC10w8rxZkO62ajVaX3Q7ZSh2cJQZp7NUOtEDW6N8yVxodcEpFrY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=eR9BwiWN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="eR9BwiWN" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 39A9148EBA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1740439402; bh=gL2D1i5dRb9ZF+OffPgZEQhQ5FHpsZCqJ8vifWT81V4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=eR9BwiWNoBpZwCuOeoxb9Al0vkYgpqnxJetx5XR5bPKr57y1G3Hj0pYHEUz1nh+u4 eJ2j7VWhgqwFAf2ei1g/JUjqlYRmdDtqsUOAn4R+wC/3DhLzd+EYNegJQmJVmObolG Mkg7x64ymnlDoWM9NSS7DnARRDm19ivFQuMvNDjrlOiX0vvx+b6ngdtLPOkbqit97a hQyfA1cGY9b6GskNSxhRKu/6/BK5TWt31TN5SsbmEk3cQht4j2pvhZIfZfnWOXwHGN +M063gr4amYLoTNMewcUb2QkhbvTnJK78nTL2rst7uW8NLYy5M3zCV96vCnx7JWRh5 C/Jkii20DrDXg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2d7f::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39A9148EBA; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 23:23:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/39] scripts/kernel-doc: rename it to scripts/kernel-doc.pl In-Reply-To: <52d0e3a45dac63af3dfad23103cd4365fb12686c.1740387599.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> References: <52d0e3a45dac63af3dfad23103cd4365fb12686c.1740387599.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:23:21 -0700 Message-ID: <874j0j2ahi.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > In preparation for deprecating scripts/kernel-doc in favor of a > new version written in Perl, rename it to scripts/kernel-doc.pl. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > --- > scripts/{kernel-doc => kernel-doc.pl} | 0 > 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > rename scripts/{kernel-doc => kernel-doc.pl} (100%) > > diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc.pl > similarity index 100% > rename from scripts/kernel-doc > rename to scripts/kernel-doc.pl > -- > 2.48.1 A pretty tiny nit but ... this isn't bisectable. I'm not sure how worried we are about that, but I thought I'd point it out. jon