The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] exit: change the release_task() paths to call flush_sigqueue() lockless
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 16:57:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874j17nk11.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205175159.GA8714@redhat.com>

On Wed, Feb 05 2025 at 18:51, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> A task can block a signal, accumulate up to RLIMIT_SIGPENDING sigqueues,
> and exit. In this case __exit_signal()->flush_sigqueue() called with irqs
> disabled can triger a hard lockup, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20190322114917.GC28876@redhat.com/
>
> Fortunately, after the recent posixtimer changes sys_timer_delete() paths
> no longer try to clear SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC and/or free tmr->sigq, and after
> the exiting task passes __exit_signal() lock_task_sighand() can't succeed
> and pid_task(tmr->it_pid) will return NULL.
>
> This means that after __exit_signal(tsk) nobody can play with tsk->pending
> or (if group_dead) with tsk->signal->shared_pending, so release_task() can
> safely call flush_sigqueue() after write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock).

I can't find a problem with that.

> Also, kill clear_tsk_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING), it was never needed.

I'm not entirely sure about that, but it does not hurt to clear it,
right?

> TODO:
> 	- we can probably shift posix_cpu_timers_exit() as well

I think so.

> 	- do_sigaction() can hit the similar problem

Indeed, but that's a tough on to solve.

Thanks,

        tglx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-06 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-05 17:51 [PATCH 0/1] exit: change the release_task() paths to call flush_sigqueue() lockless Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-05 22:18   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-02-06 12:14     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-06 15:57   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-02-06 16:23     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-06 21:04       ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-05 17:53 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Mateusz Guzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874j17nk11.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox