From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] KVM: selftests: Fix out-of-bounds reads in CPUID test's array lookups
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 10:22:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874j5sjmzz.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241003234337.273364-2-seanjc@google.com>
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes:
> When looking for a "mangled", i.e. dynamic, CPUID entry, terminate the
> walk based on the number of array _entries_, not the size in bytes of
> the array. Iterating based on the total size of the array can result in
> false passes, e.g. if the random data beyond the array happens to match
> a CPUID entry's function and index.
>
> Fixes: fb18d053b7f8 ("selftest: kvm: x86: test KVM_GET_CPUID2 and guest visible CPUIDs against KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c
> index 8c579ce714e9..fec03b11b059 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static bool is_cpuid_mangled(const struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entrie)
> {
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < sizeof(mangled_cpuids); i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mangled_cpuids); i++) {
> if (mangled_cpuids[i].function == entrie->function &&
> mangled_cpuids[i].index == entrie->index)
> return true;
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 23:43 [PATCH 00/11] KVM: selftests: AVX support + fixes Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 01/11] KVM: selftests: Fix out-of-bounds reads in CPUID test's array lookups Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 8:22 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: selftests: Precisely mask off dynamic fields in CPUID test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 03/11] KVM: selftests: Mask off OSPKE and OSXSAVE when comparing CPUID entries Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: selftests: Rework OSXSAVE CR4=>CPUID test to play nice with AVX insns Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: selftests: Configure XCR0 to max supported value by default Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:01 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-04 13:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: selftests: Verify XCR0 can be "downgraded" and "upgraded" Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:04 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: selftests: Drop manual CR4.OSXSAVE enabling from CR4/CPUID sync test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:05 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 08/11] KVM: selftests: Drop manual XCR0 configuration from AMX test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: selftests: Drop manual XCR0 configuration from state test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:10 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: selftests: Drop manual XCR0 configuration from SEV smoke test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: selftests: Ensure KVM supports AVX for SEV-ES VMSA FPU test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:14 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-20 11:28 ` [PATCH 00/11] KVM: selftests: AVX support + fixes Paolo Bonzini
2024-10-31 19:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-01 19:31 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874j5sjmzz.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox