public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Florian Rommel <mail@florommel.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Lorena Kretzschmar <qy15sije@cip.cs.fau.de>,
	Stefan Saecherl <stefan.saecherl@fau.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Florian Rommel <mail@florommel.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/kgdb: convert early breakpoints to poke breakpoints
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 20:54:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874j7pshbb.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240812174338.363838-2-mail@florommel.de>

Florian!

On Mon, Aug 12 2024 at 19:43, Florian Rommel wrote:
> On x86, after booting, the kernel text is read-only.  Then, KGDB has to
> use the text_poke mechanism to install software breakpoints.  KGDB
> uses a special (x86-specific) breakpoint type for these kinds of
> breakpoints (BP_POKE_BREAKPOINT).  When removing a breakpoint, KGDB
> always adheres to the breakpoint's original installment method, which is
> determined by its type.
>
> Before this fix, early (non-"poke") breakpoints could not be removed
> after the kernel text was set as read-only since the original code
> patching mechanism was no longer allowed to remove the breakpoints.
> Eventually, this even caused the kernel to hang (loop between int3
> instruction and the function kgdb_skipexception).
>
> With this patch, we convert early breakpoints to "poke" breakpoints
> after the kernel text has been made read-only.  This makes them
> removable later.

Please check Documentation/process/ including maintainers.tip for change
log rules.

But aside of that why having this BP_TYPE dance in the first place?

kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint(...)
{
        if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
        	text_poke_early(...);
                return;
        }
        if (mutex_is_locked(&text_mutex))
        	return -EBUSY;
	text_poke_kgdb(...);
}

See? No breakpoint type, no magic post readonly fixup, nothing.

Similar for arch_remove_breakpoint(). I reply to that gem on the other
patch.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-12 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-12 17:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] kgdb: x86: fix breakpoint removal problems Florian Rommel
2024-08-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/kgdb: convert early breakpoints to poke breakpoints Florian Rommel
2024-08-12 18:54   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-08-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/kgdb: fix hang on failed breakpoint removal Florian Rommel
2024-08-12 21:04   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-13 11:31     ` Daniel Thompson
2024-08-13 15:06       ` Florian Rommel
2024-08-13 16:21       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-14  8:51         ` [PATCH WIP] x86/kgdb: trampolines for shadowed instructions Florian Rommel
2024-08-14 10:29           ` Daniel Thompson
2024-08-14 13:52             ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-15 19:51           ` kernel test robot
2024-08-16 11:12           ` kernel test robot
2024-08-13 15:05     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/kgdb: fix hang on failed breakpoint removal Florian Rommel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874j7pshbb.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@florommel.de \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qy15sije@cip.cs.fau.de \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=stefan.saecherl@fau.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox