public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/signal32: Force inlining of __unsafe_save_user_regs() and save_tm_user_regs_unsafe()
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2023 23:06:11 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jnghjjw.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CT5FZBY14ZM4.OYXBJNXQU9A2@wheely>

"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon Jun 5, 2023 at 6:58 PM AEST, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Looking at generated code for handle_signal32() shows calls to a
>> function called __unsafe_save_user_regs.constprop.0 while user access
>> is open.
>>
>> And that __unsafe_save_user_regs.constprop.0 function has two nops at
>> the begining, allowing it to be traced, which is unexpected during
>> user access open window.
>>
>> The solution could be to mark __unsafe_save_user_regs() no trace, but
>> to be on the safe side the most efficient is to flag it __always_inline
>> as already done for function __unsafe_restore_general_regs(). The
>> function is relatively small and only called twice, so the size
>> increase will remain in the noise.
>>
>> Do the same with save_tm_user_regs_unsafe() as it may suffer the
>> same issue.
>
> Could you put a comment so someone doesn't uninline it later?

I think the "unsafe" in the name is probably sufficient to warn people
off, but you never know. Still I'd happily take a patch to add comments :)

> Marking it notrace as well would be sufficient for a comment, if that works.

I nearly did that when applying, but I'm not sure it won't change the
code generation, so I left it as-is.

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-09 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-05  8:58 [PATCH] powerpc/signal32: Force inlining of __unsafe_save_user_regs() and save_tm_user_regs_unsafe() Christophe Leroy
2023-06-06  8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-06-09 13:06   ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2023-07-03  5:26 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874jnghjjw.fsf@mail.lhotse \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox