From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C2EC77B73 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 08:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229873AbjFEIic (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2023 04:38:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34054 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229469AbjFEIia (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2023 04:38:30 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B654B0; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 01:38:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1685954307; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=K6vr5fb0CXEJhD03e4srj5+jUXBNJXWKeJF05xRhs7g=; b=zHMBd0Wf44emQIGIDsifyM5TkRgpKtJBEmvNOUUSHdyqxhoyx0hNk6F9Gd8RnnHoVzwyBq xo8qFBJzyuPI0DxrlpXftircixE9kORcjNl4tOEVUB2eZg3MaFw9pnydQD6oV+a3gio/vB mjNqRPlqVnFCSfeJ6I/Ecoue7o5nop5BgoSyLyklKqYiQbL31SElm3v7YgJv4QvMD5YPJA m3nsC4Bh1tq/uDzeimF/VMOS4IC4ureazi8CNz/2RJD1RgM9IL0oR/e7Xcr0JsdmPv2tvQ LIWj+enU6jPpMtwXGc2Ta00ZtD5fv1CpJghke6kypSQULsOw18DNFRWpJZUZHQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1685954307; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=K6vr5fb0CXEJhD03e4srj5+jUXBNJXWKeJF05xRhs7g=; b=impXIJLmTYJ2dUd0vlUvSmRQ58bfsTXLS0aux4Y3EvFIas2xIo5Ux5DHKWUJ7fjPrd1Ulr lNT7cIlANr6wlrDg== To: Xin Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, shan.kang@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/33] x86/traps: add a system interrupt table for system interrupt dispatch In-Reply-To: <20230410081438.1750-4-xin3.li@intel.com> References: <20230410081438.1750-1-xin3.li@intel.com> <20230410081438.1750-4-xin3.li@intel.com> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 10:38:26 +0200 Message-ID: <874jnm8fst.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 10 2023 at 01:14, Xin Li wrote: > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP > -DECLARE_IDTENTRY(RESCHEDULE_VECTOR, sysvec_reschedule_ipi); > +DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(RESCHEDULE_VECTOR, sysvec_reschedule_ipi); Please do not hide unrelated semantical changes in a big pile of supposed to be mechanical changes. Split it out and provide a proper explanation why this is correct and required. > +/* > + * How system interrupt handlers are called. > + */ > +#define DECLARE_SYSTEM_INTERRUPT_HANDLER(f) \ > + void f (struct pt_regs *regs) > +typedef DECLARE_SYSTEM_INTERRUPT_HANDLER((*system_interrupt_handler)); How is this related to the other changes and why is it required. Please make this reviewable. Thanks, tglx