From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Daniel Vacek <neelx@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] apic: fix timer base macro definitions
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 13:47:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874k361liu.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220202140244.1681140-1-neelx@redhat.com>
Daniel,
On Wed, Feb 02 2022 at 15:02, Daniel Vacek wrote:
> I was wondering if the aliasing of APIC_TIMER_BASE_TMBASE and
> APIC_LVT_TIMER_TSCDEADLINE was intentional or we need to << 19?
That's intentional. This is only used for the !lapic_is_integrated()
case, which is the ancient i82489DX.
Something like the below should make this more clear.
Thanks,
tglx
---
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apicdef.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apicdef.h
@@ -95,12 +95,6 @@
#define APIC_LVTTHMR 0x330
#define APIC_LVTPC 0x340
#define APIC_LVT0 0x350
-#define APIC_LVT_TIMER_BASE_MASK (0x3 << 18)
-#define GET_APIC_TIMER_BASE(x) (((x) >> 18) & 0x3)
-#define SET_APIC_TIMER_BASE(x) (((x) << 18))
-#define APIC_TIMER_BASE_CLKIN 0x0
-#define APIC_TIMER_BASE_TMBASE 0x1
-#define APIC_TIMER_BASE_DIV 0x2
#define APIC_LVT_TIMER_ONESHOT (0 << 17)
#define APIC_LVT_TIMER_PERIODIC (1 << 17)
#define APIC_LVT_TIMER_TSCDEADLINE (2 << 17)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -320,6 +320,9 @@ int lapic_get_maxlvt(void)
#define APIC_DIVISOR 16
#define TSC_DIVISOR 8
+/* i82489DX specific */
+#define I82489DX_BASE_DIVIDER (((0x2) << 18))
+
/*
* This function sets up the local APIC timer, with a timeout of
* 'clocks' APIC bus clock. During calibration we actually call
@@ -340,8 +343,14 @@ static void __setup_APIC_LVTT(unsigned i
else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_DEADLINE_TIMER))
lvtt_value |= APIC_LVT_TIMER_TSCDEADLINE;
+ /*
+ * The i82489DX APIC uses bit 18 and 19 for the base divider. This
+ * overlaps with bit 18 on integrated APICs, but is not documented
+ * in the SDM. No problem though. i82489DX equipped systems do not
+ * have TSC deadline timer.
+ */
if (!lapic_is_integrated())
- lvtt_value |= SET_APIC_TIMER_BASE(APIC_TIMER_BASE_DIV);
+ lvtt_value |= I82489DX_BASE_DIVIDER;
if (!irqen)
lvtt_value |= APIC_LVT_MASKED;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-06 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-02 14:02 [PATCH] [RFC] apic: fix timer base macro definitions Daniel Vacek
2022-04-06 11:47 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-04-06 14:54 ` Daniel Vacek
2022-04-12 20:34 ` [PATCH] x86/apic: Clarify i82489DX bit overlap in APIC_LVT0 Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-12 22:17 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-04-13 13:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-13 15:55 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-04-13 16:44 ` [tip: x86/apic] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874k361liu.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=neelx@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox