Re: Additional debug info to aid cacheline analysis

Mark Wielaard
2020-10-08T09:38:04Z

Hi,

On Thu, 2020-10-08 at 09:02 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Some time ago, I had my intern pursue the other 2 approaches for
> > symbolization. The one I see as most promising is by using the DWARF
> > information (no BPF needed). The good news is that I believe we do not
> > need more information than what is already there. We just need the
> > compiler to generate valid DWARF at most optimization levels, which I
> > believe is not the case for LLVM based compilers but maybe okay for
> > GCC.
>
> Right, I think GCC improved a lot on this front over the past few years.
> Also added Andi and Masami, who have worked on this or related topics.

For GCC Alexandre Oliva did a really thorough write up of all the
various optimization and their effect on debugging/DWARF:
https://www.fsfla.org/~lxoliva/writeups/gOlogy/gOlogy.html

GCC using -fvar-tracking and -fvar-tracking-assignments is pretty good
at keeping track of where variables are held (in memory or registers)
when in the program, even through various optimizations.

-fvar-tracking-assignments is the default with -g -O2.
Except for the upstream linux kernel code. Most distros enable it
again, but you do want to enable it by hand when building from the
upstream linux git repo.

Basically you simply want to remove this line in the top-level
Makefile:

DEBUG_CFLAGS := $(call cc-option, -fno-var-tracking-assignments)

Cheers,

Mark