From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] KVM: x86: extend struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data with token info
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 11:09:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874kskmcak.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512175017.GC12100@linux.intel.com>
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> writes:
>
> Why bother preserving backwards compatibility? AIUI, both KVM and guest
> will support async #PF iff interrupt delivery is enabled. Why not make
> the interrupt delivery approach KVM_ASYNC_PF_V2 and completely redefine the
> ABI? E.g. to make it compatible with reflecting !PRESENT faults without a
> VM-Exit via Intel's EPT Violation #VE?
>
That's the plan, actually. 'page not present' becomes #VE and 'page
present' becomes an interrupt (we don't need to inject them
synchronously). These two parts are fairly independent but can be merged
to reuse the same new capability/CPUID.
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-13 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-11 16:47 [PATCH 0/8] KVM: x86: Interrupt-based mechanism for async_pf 'page present' notifications Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 1/8] Revert "KVM: async_pf: Fix #DF due to inject "Page not Present" and "Page Ready" exceptions simultaneously" Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/8] KVM: x86: extend struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data with token info Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-12 15:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-12 15:40 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-12 15:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-12 17:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-05-13 9:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2020-05-13 12:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-15 15:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-15 18:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-05-15 19:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-15 20:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-15 20:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-05-15 20:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-05-15 22:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-15 23:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-05-21 14:59 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-22 7:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-12 21:15 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-21 18:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-23 16:34 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-26 12:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/8] KVM: introduce kvm_read_guest_offset_cached() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 4/8] KVM: x86: interrupt based APF page-ready event delivery Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-12 14:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-12 15:50 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-12 18:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-13 9:03 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-13 13:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-13 14:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-13 14:23 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-13 18:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-14 8:08 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-14 13:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 5/8] KVM: x86: acknowledgment mechanism for async pf page ready notifications Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 6/8] KVM: x86: announce KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF_INT Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 7/8] KVM: x86: Switch KVM guest to using interrupts for page ready APF delivery Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH 8/8] KVM: x86: drop KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_READY case from kvm_handle_page_fault() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-12 15:32 ` [PATCH 0/8] KVM: x86: Interrupt-based mechanism for async_pf 'page present' notifications Vivek Goyal
2020-05-12 16:12 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-13 14:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-05-14 18:14 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874kskmcak.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox