From: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com>
To: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: "Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@gmail.com>,
"Sage Weil" <sage@redhat.com>, <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ceph: fix directories inode i_blkbits initialization
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:04:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874l3b694l.fsf@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o91k61sr.fsf@suse.com> (Luis Henriques's message of "Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:31:00 +0100")
Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com> writes:
> "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org> writes:
>
>> On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 16:50 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
>>> When filling an inode with info from the MDS, i_blkbits is being
>>> initialized using fl_stripe_unit, which contains the stripe unit in
>>> bytes. Unfortunately, this doesn't make sense for directories as they
>>> have fl_stripe_unit set to '0'. This means that i_blkbits will be set
>>> to 0xff, causing an UBSAN undefined behaviour in i_blocksize():
>>>
>>> UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./include/linux/fs.h:731:12
>>> shift exponent 255 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
>>>
>>> Fix this by initializing i_blkbits to CEPH_BLOCK_SHIFT if fl_stripe_unit
>>> is zero.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/ceph/inode.c | 7 ++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>
>>> To be honest, I'm not sure CEPH_BLOCK_SHIFT is the right value to use
>>> here, but for sure the one currently being used isn't correct if the
>>> inode is a directory. Using stripe units seems to be a bug that has
>>> been there since the beginning, but it definitely became bigger problem
>>> after commit 69448867abcb ("fs: shave 8 bytes off of struct inode").
>>>
>>> This fix could also be moved into the 'switch' statement later in that
>>> function, in the S_IFDIR case, similar to commit 5ba72e607cdb ("ceph:
>>> set special inode's blocksize to page size"). Let me know which version
>>> you would prefer.
>>>
>>
>> What happens with (e.g.) named pipes or symlinks? Do those inodes also
>> get this bogus value? Assuming that they do, I'd probably prefer this
>> patch since it'd fix things for all inode types, not just directories.
>
> I tested symlinks and they seem to be handled correctly (i.e. the stripe
> units seems to be the same as the target file). Regarding pipes, I
> didn't test them, but from the code it should be set to PAGE_SHIFT (see
> the above mentioned commit 5ba72e607cdb).
Ok, after looking closer at the other inode types and running a few
tests with extra debug code, it all seems to be sane -- only directories
(root dir is an exception) will cause problems with i_blkbits being set
to a bogus value. So, I'm sticking with my original RFC patch approach,
which should be easy to apply to stable kernels.
Cheers,
--
Luis
>
> Anyway, I can change the code to do *all* the i_blkbits initialization
> inside the switch statement. Something like:
>
> switch (inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) {
> case S_IFIFO:
> case S_IFBLK:
> case S_IFCHR:
> case S_IFSOCK:
> inode->i_blkbits = PAGE_SHIFT;
> ...
> case S_IFREG:
> inode->i_blkbits = fls(le32_to_cpu(info->layout.fl_stripe_unit)) - 1;
> ...
> case S_IFLNK:
> inode->i_blkbits = fls(le32_to_cpu(info->layout.fl_stripe_unit)) - 1;
> ...
> case S_IFDIR:
> inode->i_blkbits = CEPH_BLOCK_SHIFT;
> ...
> default:
> pr_err();
> ...
> }
>
> This would add some code duplication (S_IFREG and S_IFLNK cases), but
> maybe it's a bit more clear. The other option would be obviously to
> leave the initialization outside the switch and only change the
> i_blkbits value in the S_IF{IFO,BLK,CHR,SOCK,DIR} cases.
>
> Cheers,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-24 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-23 15:50 [RFC PATCH] ceph: fix directories inode i_blkbits initialization Luis Henriques
2019-07-23 17:18 ` Jeff Layton
2019-07-23 18:31 ` Luis Henriques
2019-07-24 10:04 ` Luis Henriques [this message]
2019-07-24 11:50 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874l3b694l.fsf@suse.com \
--to=lhenriques@suse.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sage@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox