From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002D2C43143 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 16:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF76F21476 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 16:42:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AF76F21476 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726236AbeJAXUn (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:20:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49714 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725975AbeJAXUn (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:20:43 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5CF730E684D; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 16:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vitty.brq.redhat.com.redhat.com (ovpn-204-59.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.59]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C1A85E549; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 16:42:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Vitaly Kuznetsov To: Paolo Bonzini , Roman Kagan Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , "Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" , Mohammed Gamal , Cathy Avery , Wanpeng Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] KVM: x86: hyperv: implement PV IPI send hypercalls In-Reply-To: References: <20180926170259.29796-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20180926170259.29796-8-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20180927110711.GE4186@rkaganb.sw.ru> <51ff55e0-9d8d-73be-e0e7-f8580bc0206e@redhat.com> <877ej1fxkb.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 18:41:58 +0200 Message-ID: <874le5fwkp.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.27 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.46]); Mon, 01 Oct 2018 16:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 01/10/2018 18:20, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> Paolo Bonzini writes: >> >>> On 27/09/2018 13:07, Roman Kagan wrote: >> ... >>>> >>>> I must say that now it looks even more tempting to follow the same >>>> pattern as your kvm_hv_flush_tlb: define a function that would call >>>> kvm_apic_set_irq() on all vcpus in a mask (optimizing the all-set case >>>> with a NULL mask), and make kvm_hv_send_ipi perform the same hv_vp_set >>>> -> vcpu_mask transformation followed by calling into that function. >>> >>> >>> It would perhaps be cleaner, but really kvm_apic_set_irq is as efficient >>> as it can be, since it takes the destination vcpu directly. >>> >>> The code duplication for walking the sparse set is a bit ugly, perhaps >>> that could be changed to use an iterator macro. >> >> I actually like Roman's suggestion on how to re-write kvm_hv_flush_tlb() >> and I also agree that it would be easier for future readers if we write >> kvm_hv_send_ipi() in a similar way. Actually, I already have v7 in my >> stash, will be sending it out shortly. > > Just send follow ups now, please. I already have enough long queue. :) Oh yea, you should :-) No problem at all, I'll convert v7 into a follow-up series when kvm/queue is pushed. Thanks, -- Vitaly