From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org, me@tobin.cc,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_PROTO processing into its own function
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 11:33:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874lmqa4my.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180207172624.24555-7-corbet@lwn.net>
On Wed, 07 Feb 2018, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> Move the top-level prototype-processing code out of process_file().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> scripts/kernel-doc | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc
> index a6a7bb46ea29..2deddb876156 100755
> --- a/scripts/kernel-doc
> +++ b/scripts/kernel-doc
> @@ -1965,6 +1965,32 @@ sub process_body($$) {
> }
>
>
> +#
> +# STATE_PROTO: reading a function/whatever prototype.
> +#
> +sub process_proto($$) {
> + my $file = shift;
> +
> + if (/$doc_inline_oneline/) {
> + $section = $1;
> + $contents = $2;
> + if ($contents ne "") {
> + $contents .= "\n";
> + dump_section($file, $section, $contents);
> + $section = $section_default;
> + $contents = "";
> + }
> + } elsif (/$doc_inline_start/) {
> + $state = STATE_INLINE;
> + $inline_doc_state = STATE_INLINE_NAME;
> + } elsif ($decl_type eq 'function') {
> + process_proto_function($_, $file);
> + } else {
> + process_proto_type($_, $file);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +
> sub process_file($) {
> my $file;
> my $func;
> @@ -2031,24 +2057,8 @@ sub process_file($) {
> ++$warnings;
> }
> }
> - } elsif ($state == STATE_PROTO) { # scanning for function '{' (end of prototype)
> - if (/$doc_inline_oneline/) {
> - $section = $1;
> - $contents = $2;
> - if ($contents ne "") {
> - $contents .= "\n";
> - dump_section($file, $section, $contents);
> - $section = $section_default;
> - $contents = "";
> - }
> - } elsif (/$doc_inline_start/) {
> - $state = STATE_INLINE;
> - $inline_doc_state = STATE_INLINE_NAME;
> - } elsif ($decl_type eq 'function') {
> - process_proto_function($_, $file);
> - } else {
> - process_proto_type($_, $file);
> - }
> + } elsif ($state == STATE_PROTO) {
> + process_proto($file, $_);
> } elsif ($state == STATE_DOCBLOCK) {
> if (/$doc_end/)
> {
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-09 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 17:26 [PATCH 0/8] Clean up kernel-doc and fix literal-block handling Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] docs: kernel-doc: Get rid of xml_escape() and friends Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:09 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-09 13:32 ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] docs: kernel-doc: Rename and split STATE_FIELD Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:20 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_NORMAL processing into its own function Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:23 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_NAME " Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:27 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_BODY processing to a separate function Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:32 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-09 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-13 10:01 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_PROTO processing into its own function Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:33 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] docs: kernel-doc: Finish moving STATE_* code out of process_file() Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-08 2:29 ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-02-08 19:58 ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:36 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] docs: kernel-doc: Don't mangle literal code blocks in comments Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-08 2:30 ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-02-09 9:47 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-14 16:53 ` Markus Heiser
2018-02-08 2:26 ` [PATCH 0/8] Clean up kernel-doc and fix literal-block handling Tobin C. Harding
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-14 18:40 [PATCH v2 0/8] docs: Cleanup kernel-doc and fix literal block handling Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 6/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_PROTO processing into its own function Jonathan Corbet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874lmqa4my.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).