From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751318AbcBUTxz (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2016 14:53:55 -0500 Received: from smtp08.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.130]:20466 "EHLO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750806AbcBUTxx (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2016 14:53:53 -0500 X-ME-Helo: belgarion X-ME-Auth: amFyem1pay5yb2JlcnRAb3JhbmdlLmZy X-ME-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:53:45 +0100 X-ME-IP: 109.220.219.11 From: Robert Jarzmik To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jiri Kosina , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] media: pxa_camera: fix the buffer free path References: <1441539733-19201-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <87io5wwahg.fsf@belgarion.home> <87twpcj6vj.fsf@belgarion.home> <87d1s72bls.fsf@belgarion.home> X-URL: http://belgarath.falguerolles.org/ Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:53:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Guennadi Liakhovetski's message of "Sun, 21 Feb 2016 14:01:32 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <874md2xgg9.fsf@belgarion.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Guennadi Liakhovetski writes: >> Okay Guennadi, I retested this version on top of v4.5-rc2, still good to >> go. There is a minor conflict in the includes since this submission, and I can >> repost a v6 which solves it. > > How did you test it with that patchg #3?? I rebased my patches on top of v4.5-rc2. To be exact, I rebased the tree I had with these last patches on top of v4.5-rc2. I'll recheck, it's been some time ... > What's a minor conflict? A conflict on a context line : #include #include I think linux/platform_data/media/camera-pxa.h changed from my last submssion, hence the conflict. > If a patch doesn't apply at all or applies with a fuzz, yes, please fix. If > it's just a few lines off, no need to fix that. But you'll do a v6 anyway, I > assume. But of course, let us have a v6 which cleanly applies on v4.5-rc2, and restested once more. I'll try to have it done this evening. Cheers. -- Robert