From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757429AbaDXWCO (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:02:14 -0400 Received: from tiger.mobileactivedefense.com ([217.174.251.109]:47455 "EHLO tiger.mobileactivedefense.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753319AbaDXWCK (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:02:10 -0400 From: Rainer Weikusat To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.4 03/27] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not return -EINTR In-Reply-To: <20140424215552.041408348@linuxfoundation.org> (Greg Kroah-Hartman's message of "Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:55:37 -0700") References: <20140424215551.942390050@linuxfoundation.org> <20140424215552.041408348@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 23:01:54 +0100 Message-ID: <874n1i8jzh.fsf@sable.mobileactivedefense.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > know. Since this is a machine generated bulk e-mail (as far as I understand this) which is specifically not intended to be sent to me as person, as per Eric Dumazet earlier statements, I object to being on the recipient list without an opportunity to be removed from it as I have repeatedly requested. Insofar my understanding of European spam legislation goes, this is illegal.