From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935091Ab0E0SiW (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 14:38:22 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:34032 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755166Ab0E0SiV (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 14:38:21 -0400 To: Michael Tokarev Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: personality(ADDR_LIMIT_3GB) results in EFAULT From: Andi Kleen References: <4BFEA911.40600@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:38:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4BFEA911.40600@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (Michael Tokarev's message of "Thu\, 27 May 2010 21\:17\:05 +0400") Message-ID: <874oht197o.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michael Tokarev writes: > I noticed an.. interesting issue here. > > Running a 32bit executable on a 64bit kernel, > and doing > > personality(ADDR_LIMIT_3GB); > > That call succedes, but any further execve() > and friends results in EFAULT, unless whole > argv[] and envp[] are copied to a malloc'ed > space. alloca sometimes helps and sometimes > not. It worked when I wrote it originally. Sounds like a regression, perhaps related to b6a2fea39318e43fee84fa7b0b90d68bed92d2ba -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.