From: Julien BLACHE <jb@jblache.org>
To: Gildas LE NADAN <gildas.le-nadan@inha.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unkillable processes using samba, xfs and lvm2 snapshots (k 2.6.10)
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 19:01:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874qi53rw8.fsf@frigate.technologeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41D14251.4030704@inha.fr> (Gildas LE NADAN's message of "Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:24:01 +0100")
Gildas LE NADAN <gildas.le-nadan@inha.fr> wrote:
> I experience hangs on samba processes on a filer using xfs over lvm2
> as data partitions, when there is active snapshots of the xfs
> partitions.
Your problem probably lies between lvm2 and XFS. I got the same
problems this summer while doing the exact same thing.
The server would just completely hang once I started doing lvm
snapshots:
-> at the beginning, the snapshots would work OK, but XFS would hang
when accessing the filesystem afterwards
-> after a while (usually 2 or 3 snapshots, and I was taking a
snapshot every 2 hours), the snapshot would not complete, and
then only a hard reboot would work
I was doing the snapshots from a crontab, the script used xfs_freeze
to freeze the filesystem before doing the snapshot (and unfreeze it
afterwards, of course). Sometimes xfs_freeze -u would hang too (but at
this time, the server was in a pretty bad state already).
The server wasn't loaded at all, we were doing some reads/writes
through samba to have some modified files lying around, but we were
mainly prototyping the server, not stress-testing it.
LVM and XFS just don't play nice together when it comes to snapshots,
I thought it had been fixed already, but it's not the case, as we both
know...
(I can't remember the kernel version, it could have been a 2.4 kernel,
but I was using LVM2 and the latest XFS code available)
Feel free to correct me if I did something wrong (but AFAIK I took
care of everything, knowing there could have been bad interactions
between LVM and XFS).
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org>
<jb@jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-29 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-28 11:24 unkillable processes using samba, xfs and lvm2 snapshots (k 2.6.10) Gildas LE NADAN
2004-12-28 11:39 ` bert hubert
2004-12-28 15:15 ` unkillable processes using samba, xfs and lvm2 snapshots (k 2.6.10) [includes backtrace] Gildas LE NADAN
2004-12-28 14:07 ` unkillable processes using samba, xfs and lvm2 snapshots (k 2.6.10) Gene Heskett
2005-01-02 12:41 ` Christian Leber
2004-12-29 18:01 ` Julien BLACHE [this message]
2005-01-05 11:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874qi53rw8.fsf@frigate.technologeek.org \
--to=jb@jblache.org \
--cc=gildas.le-nadan@inha.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox