From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:56:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:56:52 -0500 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.134.213.6]:7177 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:56:51 -0500 To: "Udo A. Steinberg" Cc: Linux-Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: VFAT mount (bug or feature?) References: <20021113014704.780a3e4a.us15@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> From: OGAWA Hirofumi Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:03:25 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20021113014704.780a3e4a.us15@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> Message-ID: <874ralldfm.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Udo A. Steinberg" writes: > Hello, > > In my /etc/fstab I have the following entry: > > /dev/hda1 /win vfat defaults,umask=022 1 1 > > Why does 2.5.47 have user/group restricted permissions on the mount > point and all its subdirectories, despite the umask setting? The dmask option was added at 2.5.43. It's umask for directory, and default is umask of process when mounting. Please use it. eg. # mount -t vfat /dev/xxx /xxx -o dmask=022 Regards -- OGAWA Hirofumi