From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp (mail.parknet.co.jp [210.171.160.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8341937F8DA; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 07:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=210.171.160.6 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787728891; cv=none; b=jfxC0njuygI32s6B85z4FBkoOTNj/SIxLo5yMLs5/RlNmLCcEO6cXGJ5n8tbdJiJxaW0+FRLC8/qJYXRPPNWrTN5jAw/TJV4BT4GsvDzP8IlNZwkLjijaE3eS9SfecP+3Cq8fSBgK6BeS/e9yk82N/EAeJDETU9XuwvGTDdhakI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787728891; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7f8AliVFuzVWZrcc3oSQ6Wa30G5vBDD85rUnKfrIdTQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vEPvBZoRsfFc53UZ7Hs6NOU9IXlj86GQ7fTZGVJnuYVYtbxKF4EASO5BARCONVs3aMPx+FYO9qX2iZjTroe2QHjds783PX+L+tRZMeQsHnFDYSJYuBTClEd4kzevlxy14CZBrfaS4LRNfs5z6rN4x2Yx0V+K8lQ4VZ3ss7yR8sI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mail.parknet.co.jp; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=parknet.co.jp; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=parknet.co.jp header.i=@parknet.co.jp header.b=5He4etHk; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=parknet.co.jp header.i=@parknet.co.jp header.b=SRhBPmtj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=210.171.160.6 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mail.parknet.co.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=parknet.co.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=parknet.co.jp header.i=@parknet.co.jp header.b="5He4etHk"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=parknet.co.jp header.i=@parknet.co.jp header.b="SRhBPmtj" Received: from ibmpc.myhome.or.jp (server.parknet.ne.jp [210.171.168.39]) by mail.parknet.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A40DF2096798; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:21:24 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parknet.co.jp; s=20250114; t=1787728884; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dLQU4f5ng+QHPRbC9N2jlxMSgXathc2ApvwvxDPJLn8=; b=5He4etHkMT5L2EzmO8n4CbYi+TDPHYm3DCg9Brbfuq5lzhLkrj46SjFbR2IK0X96uZEYCl kqpSYmpgAb7ytBqSLgb0LpZPbQBNIsJiMRN++kjypANr/upql0VCKxtxcoLMnjjhO7ZgJz KoI5htWaXWZ8m5S/4NTwLMIaa+l8SO4LsRLTniknbpu2/7jr7kODimQBZIEfqmbUbgEv/I zQHesNwY+9b3mMSk7G0tHNmAq5f9lnYZSa/EhjKkXxsuKv6gM2sq1O5/20hxC1/HnKHTNJ wtsvXV+l0BkD4O23pi/g48p+FLJImsyaeesjDMua/tUvAG7NUdqFw8+4mIfxsA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parknet.co.jp; s=20250114-ed25519; t=1787728884; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dLQU4f5ng+QHPRbC9N2jlxMSgXathc2ApvwvxDPJLn8=; b=SRhBPmtjuPSrkuRl8E5V+pP+OnYif061DvH/adUP4lH5zKiQHhZJrUWYvbWJ4N2AURbH8o rG5LYy6cIQdTWCDA== Received: from devron.myhome.or.jp (devron.myhome.or.jp [192.168.0.3]) by ibmpc.myhome.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D28CE0006B; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:21:24 +0900 (JST) Received: by devron.myhome.or.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 24ACF22000F0; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:21:24 +0900 (JST) From: OGAWA Hirofumi To: David Timber Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fat: add noflush mount option In-Reply-To: References: <20260822173732.10230-1-dxdt@dev.snart.me> <871pbn6edz.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <787aea79-beb0-4f29-bb67-ee57f6c654c4@dev.snart.me> <87ecfmrfb9.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:21:24 +0900 Message-ID: <875x0xpcsr.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain David Timber writes: > On 8/25/26 13:31, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: >> Well, with a your patch, just remounting without "flush" option doesn't >> remove flush? > fat_parse_param() doesn't behave like other fs. The current > implementation only accepts rw and ro for reconfig. So the option cannot > be flipped up and down at will. I meant with your patch. With your patch, it updates flush to current option set, right? And default flush=false, I may missing something though. -- OGAWA Hirofumi