From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2900B3CC9F6; Tue, 5 May 2026 19:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778011090; cv=none; b=Wh93UdMOicj7Rjpj8H+52QbSkAV+nWL/Thq+ugT2t+yvzjxp0LidReRnqvNNQ/rEgEqi4sxAihziiDV1Ty437fi36iIWcsrkZw+U0Fsm0ZKJkAVYIGdHtrdkitYmzWfRaQrMTc1zjuOfilP8jCRhEC8hye0MPVDUFv8WiHCE3lU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778011090; c=relaxed/simple; bh=W35jp3biyC/4M1gGUsqXaJV7TzLzXnjHGt9kg58DRgs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CUBz24jwNiywmNAoSYEUXbO7IhXI53bLi7kkx8ItuKYRwLuXLbMxVJDA2DjGAHQbdU9Q/h8//29j/Hz0Uu5fagmfureCCfbTWozDlXSe/zwKtER0KVbjaSIh401QoRRXUPmQnBzQF/K3cjGAGrSLmpdvTAOzoQFs3rMA2eVB+n8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QcaDx0FM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QcaDx0FM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB6F1C2BCC7; Tue, 5 May 2026 19:58:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778011089; bh=W35jp3biyC/4M1gGUsqXaJV7TzLzXnjHGt9kg58DRgs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=QcaDx0FMqLlc6iPx8AsHb8msnT8tv7l82kZ2wMuIxS725ruXkCWQa7lla4brnDN+A qBIqFuOK1nkBDGy4BZaPYVnof9zYrxYav4xzusCyDeaapZR+FGAX8+IObQQrldg7MT OS2sSb7wNREHqg/bJKy0OKvBod7Sun4yV3SA7HYwVkX4iHojA5WY52pPJhkmaJL9Kr luMT83FCuRpPJjsLx+B6ZLXB0CPEaUCvyCgjmkjbddOx7u1xN2bBCmS6Dr7m5CUhsb mWHiUNQJ8ZhN6Zn8Jf+NlaOK0UQV17oGcfd3to43MXPDLJ2RmWlRquPQK06ERgwuuS eSWm5QLwEQeuw== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Sunil V L , Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Anup Patel , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v5: Add IWB to ACPI probe dependency control In-Reply-To: <20260505-gic-v5-acpi-iwb-probe-deferral-v1-2-b37b85998362@kernel.org> References: <20260505-gic-v5-acpi-iwb-probe-deferral-v1-0-b37b85998362@kernel.org> <20260505-gic-v5-acpi-iwb-probe-deferral-v1-2-b37b85998362@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 21:58:05 +0200 Message-ID: <875x51y6gi.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, May 05 2026 at 10:48, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Arm GICv5 systems, wired IRQs routed to an IWB may require resolving S/IRQs/interrupts/g Changelogs are prose and not an acronym dump ground. > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 + > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-iwb.c | 5 +++++ > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > include/linux/acpi_iort.h | 3 ++- I'm confused about the conglomerate of files affected by an irqchip change... Thanks, tglx