From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28B8C246797
	for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2026 09:34:39 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768728880; cv=none; b=fJahX5SBea3Z0K0ckQq9OXYR7tY//rR2l5c6ewKSiW5y3UJdUfSmB4jVcqUJ+6Lk6MCwgqce7Z0IIFlFNGgmS1FFoteOeHK8UHYfMH1YAMJqn2c0yUd1vCcga1XAZOM0aNcxONqEDmce/aLL48hfYRwrXacPjDe5HU3CpSUCTYk=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768728880; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=t9wO2ppV4If0uzG6bHPiS9Rj1xJdXr3svvE0MgYFa/8=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PyASX1uGibqMVslaoIfvvRWYGCvnGgUMtTYrVKS7/zBEfHnpUwzu5BcJ0Lj6UjKT0Y5DMHV2AoHVF/SYmzC+cxDF6XgrjKnn0/2S/XJ4lBCwdVuPvXjX3IGP86IpLvkg+i96ZYC83peotSbsB2djn058IaMcnD1PeuDP4ITEKYY=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YQb6AyD+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YQb6AyD+"
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBAC2C116D0;
	Sun, 18 Jan 2026 09:34:38 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
	s=k20201202; t=1768728879;
	bh=t9wO2ppV4If0uzG6bHPiS9Rj1xJdXr3svvE0MgYFa/8=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
	b=YQb6AyD+y/6wWDJDhXzmMK9YsNSxV0TGXKJZfcDmPvR5nbO6E2otPqeZfGwJ7i1KG
	 Nu40dS/RNcIqiQvb9qKti+Oha/IC2rPxmBiJNXGRHZWF0HfPwDPVfz+iMn3+IcV9tO
	 XhzRwZoRhk5Kwp1t2qwSGzOvJkbwQ1kqXnUk44arX/RiO/89izifMmamQW3bk8EsoQ
	 JOH6y8+AJSzfmcCD9jJVb3ew5/4X7yGFeakHY09M8J2qm2RIW03fZ5uMZO/Hcildsd
	 5X7mRM9FaMvvdp+PynvggI6ywZPHtd2C18QoemfPdv514vY0OyKMlcPYxXIHcrqaOb
	 N1G65W44elzng==
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>, Jiri Wiesner <jwiesner@suse.de>, Linux
 Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>, Feng Tang
 <feng.tang@intel.com>, John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: Use same threshold for read-back delay and
 time skew
In-Reply-To: <cccef2a0-9267-47c1-871a-f3a1a9d9678d@redhat.com>
References: <aWp-kKp6PkBsRxMY@incl>
 <cccef2a0-9267-47c1-871a-f3a1a9d9678d@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 10:34:35 +0100
Message-ID: <875x8z2ris.ffs@tglx>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Fri, Jan 16 2026 at 15:05, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 1/16/26 1:08 PM, Jiri Wiesner wrote:
> I think wd_seq_delay should compare to just one 
> watchdog->uncertainty_margin. See my comment on a related patch sent out 
> by Thomas.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8178bbf3-4a9d-4add-93bb-2ebd4dc03e9f@redhat.com/

Duh. I completely forgot about that one....